Bush's legacy. ( Archived) (137)

Dec 12, 2006 3:37 AM CST Bush's legacy.
Mitchell1
Mitchell1Mitchell1Chattanooga, USA116 Threads 5,584 Posts
Shock and Awe, The US military is the best in the worldat what they do. He was simply overpowered and unable to mount a response to an air campaign.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 5:56 AM CST Bush's legacy.
TheProfessor
TheProfessorTheProfessorPandoras Box, USA91 Threads 4,746 Posts
We know he had them at one point, we sold them to him in 83' under the Reagan administration.

That's just the start.. grab an online GPS map and look at these sets:

35°18'N 42°37'E
33°21'N 43°46'E
32°28'N 43°39'E
30°46'N 46°29'E
33°12'N 42°28'E
33°50'N 43°46'E

What do they have in common you ask? Chemical weapons plants - I doubt they're making chemical weapons to sell/trade, so we'll rule that one out for the time being.

Some of those were also Iraqi command centers, and 1 or 2 of them also had nuclear warhead capabilities. Do you not see that as a threat to any who he's capable of delivering said things to via rocket, or how who he sells them to could cause a major catastrophe?

Let us examine the rockets for a moment. We'll start with what Saddam had stockpiles of, the scud. All things the same, it had a small delivery range... until you look at a derivative of the Scud-B, and Scud-C. Each of those starts to shift the scale on weight vs. thrust vs. payload. The Hwasong-6, which is a deriv. of the Scud-C, can reach out and touch 500 to 700km. That's a little jaunt, don't you think?

With that, let's take a peek at what Iran and Pakistan have. Their medium-range can reach approx 1,350-1,500km. Can't discount North Korea either, they're working on an FRICBM as we speak with Iran, capable of 8,000-12,000km range. Can anyone say 'glow in the dark'?

My .02
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 6:26 AM CST Bush's legacy.
TheProfessor
TheProfessorTheProfessorPandoras Box, USA91 Threads 4,746 Posts
He did use those weapons against US troops, citing:


"Gulf War syndrome (GWS) or Gulf War illness (GWI) is the name given to an illness with symptoms including increases in the rate of immune system disorders and birth defects, reported by combat veterans of the 1991 Gulf War. It has not always been clear whether these symptoms were related to Gulf War service. Symptoms attributed to this syndrome have been wide-ranging, including chronic fatigue, loss of muscle control, migraines and other headaches, dizziness and loss of balance, memory problems, muscle and joint pain, indigestion, skin problems, and shortness of breath. U.S. Gulf War veterans have experienced mortality rates exceeding those of U.S. Vietnam veterans. Brain cancer deaths, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease) and fibromyalgia are now recognized by the Defense and Veterans Affairs departments as potentially connected to service during the Persian Gulf War."
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 12:16 PM CST Bush's legacy.
bobby7
bobby7bobby7Mission, Canada16 Threads 2,351 Posts
I think you will find that the most dangerous weapon used in Iraq are the ones employing DU (depleted uranium)..

And all the TLC the vets are getting when they return, maimed and mutilated, ensures a growing caduality rate..

Frankly, Prof..I am surprised that an astute person, such as yourself, is buying into the crap about weapons, when this evidence has been de-bunked so many times..Even de-bunked my hard core Republicans!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 12:24 PM CST Bush's legacy.
Yup, I big ole fat Banjo tucked right there underneath his bed.....professor
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 12:27 PM CST Bush's legacy.
TheProfessor
TheProfessorTheProfessorPandoras Box, USA91 Threads 4,746 Posts
Do you think that troops would magically make up something like that, and start keeling over on their own? Think about it a moment. Also think about a ruthless dictator, who has killed 1000's of his own and just put them in piles.. do you think he's not capable of doing such a thing with bio/chem weapons?

I think you have managed to completely underestimate the twisted psychosis this man possessed, and how he didn't give a damn about anyone, or anything but himself.

If we didn't sell them the items in 83', why would we make something like that up to make the US look bad? Why would he have agreed with us, and what would be the purpose of both sides lying?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 12:48 PM CST Bush's legacy.
plarkin
plarkinplarkinMinneapolis, Minnesota USA69 Threads 514 Posts
That's ridiculous. Shock and awe didn't prevent him from getting off whatever arsenal he had at his disposal. He didn't use any WMDs because he didn't have any. The UN inspectors were right all along.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 12:53 PM CST Bush's legacy.
plarkin
plarkinplarkinMinneapolis, Minnesota USA69 Threads 514 Posts
Yes TheProfesor has solved the case of the missing WMDs. Something that the CIA, NSA, MI and number of other intelligence services couldn't achieve. If only the Bush folks had turned to Connecting Singles they would have had conclusive proof.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 12:56 PM CST Bush's legacy.
TheProfessor
TheProfessorTheProfessorPandoras Box, USA91 Threads 4,746 Posts
Lack of attention to detail.. tsk tsk.. I said he had them at one point, and we knew that because we sold them to him. At no point did I say he had any made or any existed, I just gave GPS coords on the chem weapons factories capable of it.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 1:10 PM CST Bush's legacy.
TheProfessor
TheProfessorTheProfessorPandoras Box, USA91 Threads 4,746 Posts
Oh they don't? Amazing you say that..

Citing:

On September 29, 2005, the Department of Defense sent out letters to approximately 100,000 veterans who served in the 1991 Gulf War. The letters are intended to provide new information to all veterans whose units may have been exposed to very low levels of chemical warfare agent resulting from the demolition of munitions at Khamisiyah.

.....

So no, nothing like that ever happened, we didn't blow up 'non-existant' chemical munitions, and they don't know what GWS is, yet they sent out letters to servicemen and women? Is that what you're saying?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 1:17 PM CST Bush's legacy.
izzyva
izzyvaizzyvaHighland Springs, Virginia USA7 Threads 2,070 Posts
Does constant bombimg to a country for no reason other than you have a goverment that you don't agree with it, Yes that is terrorizim and USA have done it, Example Cuba (Bombing of inocent farmers for no reason on the early stages of Castro Rule). Cambodia, And many more, That's terrorism. Also allowing Israel or turning their faces and seeing them comitt terrorist acts against Palestine and Lebanon. Iraq against Iran seeing, Knowing about Chemical weapons used by sadamm againts his people and Iran and turning their faces, that is terrorism or allowing another country to do it, Double standard.




El Diablo
devil
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 1:19 PM CST Bush's legacy.
izzyva
izzyvaizzyvaHighland Springs, Virginia USA7 Threads 2,070 Posts
Backing goverments of corrupt dictators and just watching them attrocities against human rights. What is that call, Example Chile, Argentina, Brasil, Uruguay. Operation Condor on the 70's all that in the name of democracy. What you call that.




El Diablo
devil
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 1:25 PM CST Bush's legacy.
izzyva
izzyvaizzyvaHighland Springs, Virginia USA7 Threads 2,070 Posts
Yes, Sir. Iraq didn't have any WMD. Only people that love Mr. Bush keep saying this.






El Diablo
devil
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 2:45 PM CST Bush's legacy.
bobby7
bobby7bobby7Mission, Canada16 Threads 2,351 Posts
Amen!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 2:50 PM CST Bush's legacy.
Mitchell1
Mitchell1Mitchell1Chattanooga, USA116 Threads 5,584 Posts
Was the President wrong?

Good evening.

Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.

Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.

Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.



W.J. Clinton
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 2:56 PM CST Bush's legacy.
Mitchell1
Mitchell1Mitchell1Chattanooga, USA116 Threads 5,584 Posts
Did he possess these weapons or not?

With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq.


W.J. Clinton
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 2:58 PM CST Bush's legacy.
Mitchell1
Mitchell1Mitchell1Chattanooga, USA116 Threads 5,584 Posts
Regime change has been the policy of the US long before George Bush came into office.

"The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people. Bringing change in Baghdad will take time and effort. We will strengthen our engagement with the full range of Iraqi opposition forces and work with them effectively and prudently.

The decision to use force is never cost-free. Whenever American forces are placed in harm's way, we risk the loss of life. And while our strikes are focused on Iraq's military capabilities, there will be unintended Iraqi casualties."

W.J.Clinton
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 3:03 PM CST Bush's legacy.
Mitchell1
Mitchell1Mitchell1Chattanooga, USA116 Threads 5,584 Posts
Was this real or was our beloved president just trying to divert attention from himself? Did he believe what he was saying?


"If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people.

And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them."

W.J.Clinton
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 3:15 PM CST Bush's legacy.
izzyva
izzyvaizzyvaHighland Springs, Virginia USA7 Threads 2,070 Posts
He did have them and where provided by USA and the program to, it was a gift giving to The Sha by USA.



El Diablo
devil
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 12, 2006 3:20 PM CST Bush's legacy.
Mitchell1
Mitchell1Mitchell1Chattanooga, USA116 Threads 5,584 Posts
Yes, Sir. Iraq didn't have any WMD. Only people that love Mr. Bush keep saying this.

El Diablo

He did have them and where provided by USA and the program to, it was a gift giving to The Sha by USA.

El Diablo




John Kerry, is that you? Make up your mind Izzy. Do you think he did or not?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here