genuinely confused (245)
petalbabe: True. Should never have been personalised. If it had been left as a general discussion, no one would have known who the other person was.
Well I have to be honest and say that if I was the object of a discussion am not sure I could sit on my hands and not respond.
patrickthomas: Agreed Vonney, but there was two of them in it, They both went public on it
No, GF didnt..
It was only made public when IM came out.
vonney: I think that when it is a case of the OP knowing that the person they are referring to will read the thread then they have to be prepared for the fallout from that. I dont think that people should change their views on the issue because they know the people involved and might like one more than the other.
In my personal opinion though some things should be discussed in private.
In my personal opinion though some things should be discussed in private.
Well said
but more importantly what the hell was he talking about?
Im folded in half with the crap thats going on in here, its 10000000000 times better than tv some members like some channels dont come in english vonney: Well I have to be honest and say that if I was the object of a discussion am not sure I could sit on my hands and not respond.
Well, thats cool, Vonney, and I do appreciate your opinion and think your cool, but IM took the decision to bite, and thats her problem.
petalbabe: No, GF didnt..
It was only made public when IM came out.
It was only made public when IM came out.
That was on the second page I think, A private mail would have sorted it out instantly i would have thought.
patrickthomas: That was on the second page I think, A private mail would have sorted it out instantly i would have thought.
Yes, exactly. So why didnt she? I would have. Kept it between themselves.
No one knew the connection between GF and LM until LM posted.
arranroot: Well said
but more importantly what the hell was he talking about? Im folded in half with the crap thats going on in here, its 10000000000 times better than tv some members like some channels dont come in english
but more importantly what the hell was he talking about? Im folded in half with the crap thats going on in here, its 10000000000 times better than tv some members like some channels dont come in english
You are just mad. Nice...but mad...
I'm sorry but I cannot believe some peoples attitude here.
The point seems to be missed.
The OP posted details of a private mail
Why ? Attention
Gettin a dig at LM
Actually seeking an answer
Whatever reason is not important.
He embarressed her...........END OF.
He should not have posted it. He knew LM would read it.
I think Little Miss showed remarkable restraint just to post what she did and not start a public slanging match as that is what e-mail is for.
And people want to blame LM.
The point seems to be missed.
The OP posted details of a private mail
Why ? Attention
Gettin a dig at LM
Actually seeking an answer
Whatever reason is not important.
He embarressed her...........END OF.
He should not have posted it. He knew LM would read it.
I think Little Miss showed remarkable restraint just to post what she did and not start a public slanging match as that is what e-mail is for.
And people want to blame LM.
vinny1967: I'm sorry but I cannot believe some peoples attitude here.
The point seems to be missed.
The OP posted details of a private mail
Why ? Attention
Gettin a dig at LM
Actually seeking an answer
Whatever reason is not important.
He embarressed her...........END OF.
He should not have posted it. He knew LM would read it.
I think Little Miss showed remarkable restraint just to post what she did and not start a public slanging match as that is what e-mail is for.
And people want to blame LM.
The point seems to be missed.
The OP posted details of a private mail
Why ? Attention
Gettin a dig at LM
Actually seeking an answer
Whatever reason is not important.
He embarressed her...........END OF.
He should not have posted it. He knew LM would read it.
I think Little Miss showed remarkable restraint just to post what she did and not start a public slanging match as that is what e-mail is for.
And people want to blame LM.
Not being smart but do you know the OP?
vinny1967: I'm sorry but I cannot believe some peoples attitude here.
The point seems to be missed.
The OP posted details of a private mail
Why ? Attention
Gettin a dig at LM
Actually seeking an answer
Whatever reason is not important.
He embarressed her...........END OF.
He should not have posted it. He knew LM would read it.
I think Little Miss showed remarkable restraint just to post what she did and not start a public slanging match as that is what e-mail is for.
And people want to blame LM.
The point seems to be missed.
The OP posted details of a private mail
Why ? Attention
Gettin a dig at LM
Actually seeking an answer
Whatever reason is not important.
He embarressed her...........END OF.
He should not have posted it. He knew LM would read it.
I think Little Miss showed remarkable restraint just to post what she did and not start a public slanging match as that is what e-mail is for.
And people want to blame LM.
Ah read between the lines Vinney!
vinny1967: I'm sorry but I cannot believe some peoples attitude here.
The point seems to be missed.
The OP posted details of a private mail
Why ? Attention
Gettin a dig at LM
Actually seeking an answer
Whatever reason is not important.
He embarressed her...........END OF.
He should not have posted it. He knew LM would read it.
I think Little Miss showed remarkable restraint just to post what she did and not start a public slanging match as that is what e-mail is for.
And people want to blame LM.
The point seems to be missed.
The OP posted details of a private mail
Why ? Attention
Gettin a dig at LM
Actually seeking an answer
Whatever reason is not important.
He embarressed her...........END OF.
He should not have posted it. He knew LM would read it.
I think Little Miss showed remarkable restraint just to post what she did and not start a public slanging match as that is what e-mail is for.
And people want to blame LM.
No, its not the END OF..
I, and probably many other people, had absolutely no idea who he was talking about. We took it as a general thread.
And we would never have known, if LM hadnt identified herself.
petalbabe: No, its not the END OF..
I, and probably many other people, had absolutely no idea who he was talking about. We took it as a general thread.
And we would never have known, if LM hadnt identified herself.
I, and probably many other people, had absolutely no idea who he was talking about. We took it as a general thread.
And we would never have known, if LM hadnt identified herself.
I dont have a clue who either of them are.
arranroot: I even have the paperwork to prove it
?I dont doubt it!petalbabe: No, its not the END OF..
I, and probably many other people, had absolutely no idea who he was talking about. We took it as a general thread.
And we would never have known, if LM hadnt identified herself.
I, and probably many other people, had absolutely no idea who he was talking about. We took it as a general thread.
And we would never have known, if LM hadnt identified herself.
I completely understand what you are saying but maybe the thread wasn't about you or me
Do you think that details of private mails should be used as a thread because the OP is unhappy with the way it ended ?
vinny1967: I completely understand what you are saying but maybe the thread wasn't about you or me
Do you think that details of private mails should be used as a thread because the OP is unhappy with the way it ended ?
Do you think that details of private mails should be used as a thread because the OP is unhappy with the way it ended ?
I agree with you. But in this instance, private details were not given. No one knew who GF was talking about, apart from LM herself, and her close friends..
petalbabe: I agree with you. But in this instance, private details were not given. No one knew who GF was talking about, apart from LM herself, and her close friends..
Well Petal I really dont see how the OP didnt realise that those details were going to come out.
vonney: Well Petal I really dont see how the OP didnt realise that those details were going to come out.
But it wasnt him who made it public! He made it quite ambiguous. No one knew, apart from those who already knew about the relationship. It was LM who choose to come out. No one else would have known!
petalbabe: I agree with you. But in this instance, private details were not given. No one knew who GF was talking about, apart from LM herself, and her close friends..
My point is private details were given.
The thread was about what she had wrote. He also stated in it that she was from CS
The fact that you, me or most other people didnt know was incosequential.
It set out to hurt.........deliberately or not.....dont matter.
It still had to have hurt.
What a bloody world we live in where that is defended
Will leave ye to it.
Night
More Threads
Icebergs Still Around
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
Feel Good Music
How far is too far?
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
Sleepy Don!
other can see but not you
1830's Music
Nature
your personality
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
In my personal opinion though some things should be discussed in private.
True. Should never have been personalised. If it had been left as a general discussion, no one would have known who the other person was.