Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down? ( Archived) (53)

Dec 1, 2009 10:11 PM CSTAre you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
simplestuff
simplestuffsimplestuffMelbourne, Victoria, Australia2 Threads 2 Polls 14 Posts

Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?(Vote Below)

- (To Vote: select an option above, then press this button)
Yes, there's no such thing as global warming
4
11%
Yes, humans aren't causing global warming
4
11%
Yes, the CPRS was an overreaction for Aus
2
6%
Undecided
2
6%
No, the CPRS was a responsible policy for Aus
11
31%
No, the CPRS was as responsible as Aus gets
1
3%
Yes, the CPRS wouldn't have cut emissions enough
4
11%
I have no idea what you're talking about...
7
20%
Total Votes
35
Pity I can't restrict this poll to Aussies only...
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 1:07 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
amelie13
amelie13amelie13Sydney, New South Wales Australia16 Threads 3 Polls 327 Posts
simplestuff: Pity I can't restrict this poll to Aussies only...


I need to do a little bit more reading on the CPRS and I suspect most Australians don't really understand whats involved. KRudd needs to get vocal and explain more about it - he's good at drumming home basic messages as we saw during his pre-election campaign & I don't know why he hasn't been more vocal about it.

What I do know about ETS is that big industry polluters will have to pay through the nose if they want to continue to make their money that way. I think it would encourage those industries to find cleaner and more sustainable ways to produce and I don't think that's a bad thing. Will it be impact on product costs, jobs etc.....yes, in the short term I'm sure it would.

What i definitely don't want is a double dissolution ending up with an election that returns Liberals to office. I'd be happy to see this legislation passed for that reason alone.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 1:45 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
kizzy27
kizzy27kizzy27a south coast beach, New South Wales Australia106 Threads 6 Polls 7,413 Posts
Ofcourse not the CPRS Is The only responible stratagy for Australia as a nation !!!!Tony abbott & his divided party are being childish & maverick in their attempts to block such amn important piece of legislation I mean do the liberals seriously not care about our climate , our planet & the effects of carbon emmissions are having on our already strained enviroment !
Seriously idiotic




dont get me started devil
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 1:50 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
kizzy27
kizzy27kizzy27a south coast beach, New South Wales Australia106 Threads 6 Polls 7,413 Posts
amelie13: I need to do a little bit more reading on the CPRS and I suspect most Australians don't really understand whats involved. KRudd needs to get vocal and explain more about it - he's good at drumming home basic messages as we saw during his pre-election campaign & I don't know why he hasn't been more vocal about it.

What I do know about ETS is that big industry polluters will have to pay through the nose if they want to continue to make their money that way. I think it would encourage those industries to find cleaner and more sustainable ways to produce and I don't think that's a bad thing. Will it be impact on product costs, jobs etc.....yes, in the short term I'm sure it would.

What i definitely don't want is a double dissolution ending up with an election that returns Liberals to office. I'd be happy to see this legislation passed for that reason alone.

Even with an election there is noway liberal would win
they simply have no support there a joke even their own party is divided on key issues thumbs down
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 2:14 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
bourbon
bourbonbourbonSunshine Coast, Queensland Australia32 Threads 4 Polls 3,504 Posts
kizzy27: Ofcourse not the CPRS Is The only responible stratagy for Australia as a nation !!!!Tony abbott & his divided party are being childish & maverick in their attempts to block such amn important piece of legislation I mean do the liberals seriously not care about our climate , our planet & the effects of carbon emmissions are having on our already strained enviroment !
Seriously idiotic

dont get me started


Australia contributes 1.3% of global carbon emissions. To impose an emissions tax on Australians before the rest of the world does anything is NOT in the best interest of our nation.

Tony Abbott and his divided party seemed kinda united, with only 2 liberals crossing the floor. dunno

I think that you've been out in the sun too long. drinking
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 2:37 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
amelie13
amelie13amelie13Sydney, New South Wales Australia16 Threads 3 Polls 327 Posts
bourbon: Australia contributes 1.3% of global carbon emissions. To impose an emissions tax on Australians before the rest of the world does anything is NOT in the best interest of our nation.

Tony Abbott and his divided party seemed kinda united, with only 2 liberals crossing the floor.

I think that you've been out in the sun too long.


This is part of the issue I would like more information on. KRudd said during his election campaign that he couldn't quote figures or targets until Copenhagen and I'm admittedly unsure what the rush is, but conversely, the Liberals seem against a tax of any kind at all. If the delay were simply around the appropriate amount to tax, I'd understand the Liberals hesitation better.

I get the feeling that the Libs are just trying to mandate a different approach for the sake of being contrary, to be honest.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 3:03 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
bourbon
bourbonbourbonSunshine Coast, Queensland Australia32 Threads 4 Polls 3,504 Posts
amelie13: This is part of the issue I would like more information on. KRudd said during his election campaign that he couldn't quote figures or targets until Copenhagen and I'm admittedly unsure what the rush is, but conversely, the Liberals seem against a tax of any kind at all. If the delay were simply around the appropriate amount to tax, I'd understand the Liberals hesitation better.

I get the feeling that the Libs are just trying to mandate a different approach for the sake of being contrary, to be honest.


My take on it is that the liberals are a bit sceptical towards climate change but would introduce an ETS in line with the rest of the world.

KRudd wanted this ETS pushed through so that he could go to Copenhagen and present himself as a big man who's taking action. He also needs the ETS to help fill the huge hole he's put into the federal budget.

The bottom line is that we shouldn't disadvantage Australians by introducing an ETS before the rest of the world does. The government would have to give industry huge subsidies to stop them moving offshore and it would end up being nothing more than a tax on the people.

Even if we stopped all carbon emissions here, that's only 1.3% of what's emitted globally so without the rest of the world onboard it would be nothing more than an expensive and futile exercise.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 3:07 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
kizzy27
kizzy27kizzy27a south coast beach, New South Wales Australia106 Threads 6 Polls 7,413 Posts
bourbon: Australia contributes 1.3% of global carbon emissions. To impose an emissions tax on Australians before the rest of the world does anything is NOT in the best interest of our nation.

Tony Abbott and his divided party seemed kinda united, with only 2 liberals crossing the floor.

I think that you've been out in the sun too long.

Anything we can do to reduce global emmisions is not only good for our nation but also our planet !!!!
People need to stop being so focused on their hip pockets & start to realize that yes becoming a green planet is going to cost us all financially but look at the gain FFS
A future for our decendants , a planet thats cool green & able to sustain life
wake up & stop being so driven by greed there is far far more at stake than the almighty dollar ...wine
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 3:12 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
kizzy27
kizzy27kizzy27a south coast beach, New South Wales Australia106 Threads 6 Polls 7,413 Posts
bourbon: My take on it is that the liberals are a bit sceptical towards climate change but would introduce an ETS in line with the rest of the world.

KRudd wanted this ETS pushed through so that he could go to Copenhagen and present himself as a big man who's taking action. He also needs the ETS to help fill the huge hole he's put into the federal budget.

The bottom line is that we shouldn't disadvantage Australians by introducing an ETS before the rest of the world does. The government would have to give industry huge subsidies to stop them moving offshore and it would end up being nothing more than a tax on the people.

Even if we stopped all carbon emissions here, that's only 1.3% of what's emitted globally so without the rest of the world onboard it would be nothing more than an expensive and futile exercise.

Kevin Rudd wants to show the world that Austalia is prepared to take action Perhaps by doing so other nations will follow suit .
The fact that our contribution in emmissions is small is beside the point .
whats important is we as australians are doing what we can to reduce our global carbon footprint!
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 3:13 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
angelmarz
angelmarzangelmarzperth, Western Australia Australia37 Threads 1,091 Posts
i scratch my head over the liberals confused big thumbs down in my books...GREEN not GREED thumbs up
kizzy27: Anything we can do to reduce global emmisions is not only good for our nation but also our planet !!!!
People need to stop being so focused on their hip pockets & start to realize that yes becoming a green planet is going to cost us all financially but look at the gain FFS
A future for our decendants , a planet thats cool green & able to sustain life
wake up & stop being so driven by greed there is far far more at stake than the almighty dollar ...
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 5:36 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
amelie13
amelie13amelie13Sydney, New South Wales Australia16 Threads 3 Polls 327 Posts
bourbon: My take on it is that the liberals are a bit sceptical towards climate change but would introduce an ETS in line with the rest of the world.

KRudd wanted this ETS pushed through so that he could go to Copenhagen and present himself as a big man who's taking action. He also needs the ETS to help fill the huge hole he's put into the federal budget.

The bottom line is that we shouldn't disadvantage Australians by introducing an ETS before the rest of the world does. The government would have to give industry huge subsidies to stop them moving offshore and it would end up being nothing more than a tax on the people.

Even if we stopped all carbon emissions here, that's only 1.3% of what's emitted globally so without the rest of the world onboard it would be nothing more than an expensive and futile exercise.


thanks for explaining this bourbon thumbs up
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 2, 2009 9:08 PM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
simplestuff
simplestuffsimplestuffMelbourne, Victoria Australia2 Threads 2 Polls 14 Posts
I think this is a pretty complex topic, and I'm sure I won't do it justice here, but here's my two cents anyway.

It's incredibly disappointing to see how many people view the CPRS as environmentally responsible. I view it more-or-less as a scam designed to make Australia/Rudd 'look' semi-responsible while doing nothing of environmental or national worth. There's good reason why Kevin hasn't gone to any lengths to explain its inner workings.

Just recalling from memory, the CPRS is environmentally useless because:

1) The reductions in Green house gas emissions (about 5-25%) below 1990 levels are inadequate to stop global warming. If all developed countries set such pitiful targets we would not avoid catastrophic climate change.

2) It restricts how high the price of carbon can go for a number of years. This price is too low to drive any real change in Australia

3) It allows unlimited international offsetting of emissions. This means that polluting companies here in Aus don't have to stop polluting, they can just pay a lot less money to someone in a poor country to say that they're reducing emissions by a certain amount. International offsets are notoriously dodgy. This also means that domestically Australia will be left flat-footed in future years greenhouse pollution is restricted more strongly - it takes time to change.

4) The legislation would essentially create pollution 'property rights' for powerful multinationals who pollute the most. This means that the country could get sued in future if we actually decide to take real action on the climate.


Sure Aus only emits 1.3% of the world's total.. but we are also one of the world's major exporters of coal. The emissions our coal exports cause aren't presently counted towards our total. Even without them, we are essentially the worst polluters on the planet per person. I'm not sure if somehow people think that the rest of the world is going to act responsibly on the environment while letting Australia pollute without consequence - just won't happen.

As much as I hate to mention politics, there are essentially two parties in Australia when it comes to climate change: The Greens and 'the other two'.

In summary, I was incredibly relieved to see the CPRS voted down. At least now there's a tiny chance of doing something effective in future - otherwise, why bother?
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 12:45 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
snoopyau
snoopyausnoopyauBrisbane, Queensland Australia2 Threads 85 Posts
Hi

I've been hearing a lot lately about Carbon , environment and targets but no real world applications .

Overview:
- Old crap boxs burnt or crushed or recyled
- People start acting responsible and take care of placing rubbish correctly
- Using glass instead of plastic ?
- Solar Farms
- Home users baring the cost for business/education/commerical


Besides Commercial and non Commercial changing polution emissions , what about the rest of the waste in the world today .

Am I the only one disguested at Drunk and Lazy people that drop litter so close to the creeks/water ways/bins ?

I work Night Shifts at a Service Station (Yes not the most enviromentaly friendly) but its amazing how many people will walk past SEVERAL BINS and drop something on the ground or get to the bus stop which is just outside the grounds then dump their waste on the ground BESIDE the BIN.

Myself I would like to see a simular car system like Japan has , if your car is used x amount of km's on its engine the engine has to go and be replaced or the whole car (Bit of a waste of a nice shell) It would finaly get rid of these old datson/kingswoods/gemmi/crapboxs off the road .

I am hoping once all the service stations go E10% blend of Ethlon then all the cars that cant work it get the flick

I would like to see Milk and Drinks come back in Glass Bottles as I found it tasted better in them , and when I was young you could collect the bottles to get money.

With all the problems with the utter piss poor quality of Queensland Power Grid , I am amazed we havent gone Nuclar or some people with huge areas of dry hot land has setup a solar farm , were its setup with a truckload of solar pannels to feed power to the main grid (might aswell use the sun since the bloody heat is annoying)

Recently a school that close by to my work built a new office building that 2 months on they still havent moved into , but for a good 6 weeks they left every single light inside the building and outside on during the whole night , what a WASTE OF POWER .
Normal peoples power keeps on going up and up and up , so what do the goverment and schools do , ohh lets just chew it up for no good reason . My point here is that home users , shoundnt bare the cost for business/commercial/schools
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 12:56 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
steve6610
steve6610steve6610Goolwa, South Australia Australia2,184 Posts
snoopyau: Hi

I've been hearing a lot lately about Carbon , environment and targets but no real world applications .

Overview:
- Old crap boxs burnt or crushed or recyled
- People start acting responsible and take care of placing rubbish correctly
- Using glass instead of plastic ?
- Solar Farms
- Home users baring the cost for business/education/commericalBesides Commercial and non Commercial changing polution emissions , what about the rest of the waste in the world today .

Am I the only one disguested at Drunk and Lazy people that drop litter so close to the creeks/water ways/bins ?

I work Night Shifts at a Service Station (Yes not the most enviromentaly friendly) but its amazing how many people will walk past SEVERAL BINS and drop something on the ground or get to the bus stop which is just outside the grounds then dump their waste on the ground BESIDE the BIN.

Myself I would like to see a simular car system like Japan has , if your car is used x amount of km's on its engine the engine has to go and be replaced or the whole car (Bit of a waste of a nice shell) It would finaly get rid of these old datson/kingswoods/gemmi/crapboxs off the road .

I am hoping once all the service stations go E10% blend of Ethlon then all the cars that cant work it get the flick

I would like to see Milk and Drinks come back in Glass Bottles as I found it tasted better in them , and when I was young you could collect the bottles to get money.

With all the problems with the utter piss poor quality of Queensland Power Grid , I am amazed we havent gone Nuclar or some people with huge areas of dry hot land has setup a solar farm , were its setup with a truckload of solar pannels to feed power to the main grid (might aswell use the sun since the bloody heat is annoying)

Recently a school that close by to my work built a new office building that 2 months on they still havent moved into , but for a good 6 weeks they left every single light inside the building and outside on during the whole night , what a WASTE OF POWER .
Normal peoples power keeps on going up and up and up , so what do the goverment and schools do , ohh lets just chew it up for no good reason . My point here is that home users , shoundnt bare the cost for business/commercial/schools


thats is a great post thumbs up , my brother in law runs a major recycling / waste centre in Adelaide's northern suburbs & literally everything is recycled. whitegoods are tested & repaired, same with furniture & donated to charities. bikes, etc that need minor repairs are fixed & given to disadvantaged children, all the bricks, etc are crushed & used again for roads, etc they at present recycle 95% of everything that is sent there handshake
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 1:01 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
LoveableOne
LoveableOneLoveableOneMelbourne, Victoria Australia67 Threads 4,079 Posts
snoopyau:

Myself I would like to see a simular car system like Japan has , if your car is used x amount of km's on its engine the engine has to go and be replaced or the whole car (Bit of a waste of a nice shell) It would finaly get rid of these old datson/kingswoods/gemmi/crapboxs off the road .

I am hoping once all the service stations go E10% blend of Ethlon then all the cars that cant work it get the flick



And of the people cant afford new cars?
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 1:05 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
steve6610
steve6610steve6610Goolwa, South Australia Australia2,184 Posts
LoveableOne: And of the people cant afford new cars?


maybe the tarrifs have to be looked at , to make the cars more affordable
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 1:07 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
LoveableOne
LoveableOneLoveableOneMelbourne, Victoria Australia67 Threads 4,079 Posts
steve6610: maybe the tarrifs have to be looked at , to make the cars more affordable


For years many have said that but sif that would happen..
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 1:08 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
steve6610
steve6610steve6610Goolwa, South Australia Australia2,184 Posts
LoveableOne: For years many have said that but sif that would happen..


I know mate , wishful thinking when you see how cheap new cars are in Eurpoe, japan etc its quite dissapointing
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 5:33 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
EliteOne
EliteOneEliteOneBrisbane, Queensland Australia38 Threads 1,590 Posts
I’ve seen all the arguments for and against global warming and I lean towards natural occurrence. Last time we had Global warming was about 9000 years ago and there was no industries around. But in saying that chemicals in the air, while not having a great affect on the environment are doing some real damage to our well being.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 5:37 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
steve6610
steve6610steve6610Goolwa, South Australia Australia2,184 Posts
EliteOne: I’ve seen all the arguments for and against global warming and I lean towards natural occurrence. Last time we had Global warming was about 9000 years ago and there was no industries around. But in saying that chemicals in the air, while not having a great affect on the environment are doing some real damage to our well being.



great post thumbs up . I am of the same view, I posted on the inters how the murray - darling has been blamed on irrigators, etc up stream from Vic & SA , but in 1901 there was the Federation Drought where the entire system was bone dry also there were no cyclones for a period of 2 years then aswell.

so even though I do feel we are contributing to some issues maybe it is the earths way of reinvigorating itself
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 5:49 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
EliteOne
EliteOneEliteOneBrisbane, Queensland Australia38 Threads 1,590 Posts
steve6610: great post . I am of the same view, I posted on the inters how the murray - darling has been blamed on irrigators, etc up stream from Vic & SA , but in 1901 there was the Federation Drought where the entire system was bone dry also there were no cyclones for a period of 2 years then aswell.

so even though I do feel we are contributing to some issues maybe it is the earths way of reinvigorating itself

There is a great perception that the Earth does do its own work, it certainly held its balance in nature until humans came along and unstableized everything.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 6:18 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
bubblesron
bubblesronbubblesronmaryborough, Queensland Australia442 Posts
EliteOne: There is a great perception that the Earth does do its own work, it certainly held its balance in nature until humans came along and unstableized everything.


Agreed, but keep in mind that there were catastrophic climatic and geographic events long before there were humans, another factor is the loss of species. That was occurring long before the existance of homosapiens. Perhaps we make some contribution, be remember that we are also part of nature, put here by nature (or God if you insist) and therefore have a right to exist in the way we have evolved or developed over the life of the species. The earth will cope, it existed long before humans and will probably exist long after we have followed the myriad of species lost since the dawn of this planet.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 6:20 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
steve6610
steve6610steve6610Goolwa, South Australia Australia2,184 Posts
bubblesron: Agreed, but keep in mind that there were catastrophic climatic and geographic events long before there were humans, another factor is the loss of species. That was occurring long before the existance of homosapiens. Perhaps we make some contribution, be remember that we are also part of nature, put here by nature (or God if you insist) and therefore have a right to exist in the way we have evolved or developed over the life of the species. The earth will cope, it existed long before humans and will probably exist long after we have followed the myriad of species lost since the dawn of this planet.


wow another great post on this topic thumbs up handshake
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 6, 2009 6:25 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
simplestuff
simplestuffsimplestuffMelbourne, Victoria Australia2 Threads 2 Polls 14 Posts
EliteOne: I’ve seen all the arguments for and against global warming and I lean towards natural occurrence. Last time we had Global warming was about 9000 years ago and there was no industries around. But in saying that chemicals in the air, while not having a great affect on the environment are doing some real damage to our well being.


I think the science of global warming is complicated... and the layperson has little chance of 'seeing all the arguments' let alone understanding them.

There are some seriously brainy guys out there who dedicate decades of their lives to understanding the science. When the overwhelming majority of a scientific profession says global warming is happening and we're causing it, we sensibly should take their word for it - as the governments of the world are doing.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 7, 2009 5:21 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
EliteOne
EliteOneEliteOneBrisbane, Queensland Australia38 Threads 1,590 Posts
simplestuff: I think the science of global warming is complicated... and the layperson has little chance of 'seeing all the arguments' let alone understanding them.

There are some seriously brainy guys out there who dedicate decades of their lives to understanding the science. When the overwhelming majority of a scientific profession says global warming is happening and we're causing it, we sensibly should take their word for it - as the governments of the world are doing.


I don’t know how old you are or how well your memory serves you but do you remember the same hype with global cooling in the 70’s and 80’s and from the same institute of science! Some people were spending big around the world in stocking up for the up coming event...lol Whenever there is money to be made be sure to find falsified evidence. Independent studies have shown Chlorine and fluoride in our drinking water have the potential to lower the IQ by 40 points Sugarine cause brain tumours in rats and if it shows up in rats be sure its has some effect on humans. The bottom line is, if they cannot exploit us financially they don’t need us. Everything is a money grabbing scheme these days and there is very little truth in the truth. but that’s only my opinion! cheers
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 7, 2009 5:23 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
LoveableOne
LoveableOneLoveableOneMelbourne, Victoria Australia67 Threads 4,079 Posts
And a correct opinion mate! So sad aint it..
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 7, 2009 5:31 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
EliteOne
EliteOneEliteOneBrisbane, Queensland Australia38 Threads 1,590 Posts
LoveableOne: And a correct opinion mate! So sad aint it..

It is sad, more in Australia then anywhere else in the world that has a free market. The other day I stopped in Coles to buy a hand full of items which I use daily and I mean few and they summed up to $90 far out and I still haven’t done my shopping for the week!
doh
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 7, 2009 5:36 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
LoveableOne
LoveableOneLoveableOneMelbourne, Victoria Australia67 Threads 4,079 Posts
EliteOne: It is sad, more in Australia then anywhere else in the world that has a free market. The other day I stopped in Coles to buy a hand full of items which I use daily and I mean few and they summed up to $90 far out and I still haven’t done my shopping for the week!


Yea I know other day at coles was near 200 bucks! doh dunno what can we do..
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 7, 2009 5:50 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
EliteOne
EliteOneEliteOneBrisbane, Queensland Australia38 Threads 1,590 Posts
LoveableOne: Yea I know other day at coles was near 200 bucks! what can we do..


The thing is not much- we have lost the art of survival due to busy& cramped lifestyles. I was born on a small hobby farm and I don’t ever remember going to the shops to buy veggies, eggs chickens.. etc places like Franklins at the time really had to fight the competition for your dollar. Honestly these days I couldnt do what my parents did, they worked longer hours and still found enough time and a desire to attend the gardens and few animals.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 7, 2009 5:51 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
LoveableOne
LoveableOneLoveableOneMelbourne, Victoria Australia67 Threads 4,079 Posts
EliteOne: The thing is not much- we have lost the art of survival due to busy& cramped lifestyles. I was born on a small hobby farm and I don’t ever remember going to the shops to buy veggies, eggs chickens.. etc places like Franklins at the time really had to fight the competition for your dollar. Honestly these days I couldnt do what my parents did, they worked longer hours and still found enough time and a desire to attend the gardens and few animals.


Ya people aint like what they used to be..we are mechanised now. Automated now, well not everyone but most lol. Just the way it is mate...
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dec 7, 2009 5:55 AM CST Are you happy to see Australia's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) get voted down?
bubblesron
bubblesronbubblesronmaryborough, Queensland Australia442 Posts
EliteOne: I don’t know how old you are or how well your memory serves you but do you remember the same hype with global cooling in the 70’s and 80’s and from the same institute of science! Some people were spending big around the world in stocking up for the up coming event...lol Whenever there is money to be made be sure to find falsified evidence. Independent studies have shown Chlorine and fluoride in our drinking water have the potential to lower the IQ by 40 points Sugarine cause brain tumours in rats and if it shows up in rats be sure its has some effect on humans. The bottom line is, if they cannot exploit us financially they don’t need us. Everything is a money grabbing scheme these days and there is very little truth in the truth. but that’s only my opinion!


Can I suggest you find and download a movie called "Zietgiest" and another called "ENDGAME" food for thought for all intelligent people. I am not saying to believe what you see, just see it and think
------ This poll is Archived ------

This Poll is Archived

This Poll is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Poll get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
Message #318

Stats for this Poll

35 Votes
1,409 Views
53 Comments
by simplestuff (2 Polls)
Created: Dec 2009
Last Viewed: Apr 27
Last Commented: Dec 2009
Last Voted: Jul 2017

Share this Poll

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here