Obama calls moving a way from reliance on oil a “national mission” ! Support! (712)
Presently the REP nomination committee is so fustrated in attempting to figure out how is running in the 2012 campaign.
They decided to loo out side of the country. They figured if the
DEM can do it with Obama, they can do it as well.
Presently on the REP international Presidential nomination list
is:
Netyanhu of Isreal
Skarhozy of France
Merkel of Germany
Palin of Alaska
Medvedev of Russia
Interviews are being done.
The present thought in the REP party is that Palin/Medvedev would make a strong running pair for a opposition to the Obama/? team.
That they share a common border in the Bearing Straits means that they have worked together in the past.
What do you guys want.....it is April 1st.
They decided to loo out side of the country. They figured if the
DEM can do it with Obama, they can do it as well.
Presently on the REP international Presidential nomination list
is:
Netyanhu of Isreal
Skarhozy of France
Merkel of Germany
Palin of Alaska
Medvedev of Russia
Interviews are being done.
The present thought in the REP party is that Palin/Medvedev would make a strong running pair for a opposition to the Obama/? team.
That they share a common border in the Bearing Straits means that they have worked together in the past.
What do you guys want.....it is April 1st.
Washington Times: (more great news about the obummer admin:
Barack Obama has some 'splaining to do about taxpayers' profitable "investment" in General Motors. It turns out the president is imagining things.
Though Democrats tout the auto bailout as a success, recent reports illustrate the taxpayer cost of the GM auto bailout was substantially larger than the Obama administration and a Congressional Oversight report has owned up to.
"American taxpayers are now positioned to recover more than my administration invested in GM,” President Obama said, according to a piece in USA Today last November. Steven Rattner, former head of the Treasury's auto task force agreed, telling CNN in November: “Recent progress at GM gives reason for optimism that it may be possible for taxpayers to get every penny back.”
In fact, Investor's Business Daily reported that even the White House’s Director of the National Economic Council remarked that the Treasury Department Department had a good chance in "recovering most, if not all, of its investment in" GM.
However, a March 16 Congressional Oversight report, tells a different story. It estimates taxpayers will be out of $25 billion. Additionally, the report points out that “full repayment will not be possible unless the government is able to sell its remaining shares at a far higher price.”
That's only the beginning. Both the White House and the Congressional Oversight report omit the fact that during its bankruptcy, GM got a $45 billion tax break, courtesy of the American people.
GM is driving “away from its U.S.-government-financed restructuring with a final gift in its trunk: a tax break that could be worth as much as $45 billion,” reported The Wall Street Journal last November.
Over one year after the promises President Obama and his administration made about the auto bailout, a February piece on AutoBlog also confirms that GM will also get a $14 billion dollar domestic tax break:
Barack Obama has some 'splaining to do about taxpayers' profitable "investment" in General Motors. It turns out the president is imagining things.
Though Democrats tout the auto bailout as a success, recent reports illustrate the taxpayer cost of the GM auto bailout was substantially larger than the Obama administration and a Congressional Oversight report has owned up to.
"American taxpayers are now positioned to recover more than my administration invested in GM,” President Obama said, according to a piece in USA Today last November. Steven Rattner, former head of the Treasury's auto task force agreed, telling CNN in November: “Recent progress at GM gives reason for optimism that it may be possible for taxpayers to get every penny back.”
In fact, Investor's Business Daily reported that even the White House’s Director of the National Economic Council remarked that the Treasury Department Department had a good chance in "recovering most, if not all, of its investment in" GM.
However, a March 16 Congressional Oversight report, tells a different story. It estimates taxpayers will be out of $25 billion. Additionally, the report points out that “full repayment will not be possible unless the government is able to sell its remaining shares at a far higher price.”
That's only the beginning. Both the White House and the Congressional Oversight report omit the fact that during its bankruptcy, GM got a $45 billion tax break, courtesy of the American people.
GM is driving “away from its U.S.-government-financed restructuring with a final gift in its trunk: a tax break that could be worth as much as $45 billion,” reported The Wall Street Journal last November.
Over one year after the promises President Obama and his administration made about the auto bailout, a February piece on AutoBlog also confirms that GM will also get a $14 billion dollar domestic tax break:
Gotta wonder what Obama knew and and when? Gud bless Libya 
Arab Banking Corp., the lender part- owned by the Central Bank of Libya, used a New York branch to get 73 loans from the U.S. Federal Reserve in the 18 months after Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed. The bank, then 29 percent-owned by the Libyan state, had aggregate borrowings in that period of $35 billion -- while the largest single loan amount outstanding was $1.2 billion in July 2009, according to Fed data released yesterday. In October 2008, when lending to financial institutions by the central bank’s so- called discount window peaked at $111 billion, Arab Banking took repeated loans totaling more than $2 billion.
Fed officials say all the discount window loans made during the worst financial crisis since the 1930s have been repaid with interest.
The U.S. government has frozen assets linked to the regime of Libyan ruler Muammar Qaddafi and engaged in air strikes against his military forces, which are battling a rebel uprising in the North African country. Arab Banking got an exemption that allows the firm to continue operating while barring it from engaging in any transactions with the Libyan government, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
Gud bless Libya and Obama
Sanders Reacts
“It is incomprehensible to me that while creditworthy small businesses in Vermont and throughout the country could not receive affordable loans, the Federal Reserve was providing tens of billions of dollars in credit to a bank that is substantially owned by the Central Bank of Libya,” Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, wrote in a letter to Fed and U.S. officials.
The letter was addressed to Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and John Walsh, acting comptroller of the currency. The figure refers to the aggregate amount of loans the bank received under U.S. lending programs. Arab Banking, known as ABC, owed about $4 billion to the Fed under other bailout programs in the fall of 2009, data released in December show.
“ABC has a robust balance sheet, is amply capitalized and currently maintains a comfortable liquidity position,” the company said in an e-mailed statement. “ABC currently has no outstanding loans under any Federal Reserve, or other, emergency lending program.”
Libya’s Stake
Jack Gutt, a spokesman for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, declined to comment. Arab Banking said Dec. 2 that Libya’s stake in the Manama, Bahrain-based lender had increased to 59 percent.
Arab Banking Corp., the lender part- owned by the Central Bank of Libya, used a New York branch to get 73 loans from the U.S. Federal Reserve in the 18 months after Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed. The bank, then 29 percent-owned by the Libyan state, had aggregate borrowings in that period of $35 billion -- while the largest single loan amount outstanding was $1.2 billion in July 2009, according to Fed data released yesterday. In October 2008, when lending to financial institutions by the central bank’s so- called discount window peaked at $111 billion, Arab Banking took repeated loans totaling more than $2 billion.
Fed officials say all the discount window loans made during the worst financial crisis since the 1930s have been repaid with interest.
The U.S. government has frozen assets linked to the regime of Libyan ruler Muammar Qaddafi and engaged in air strikes against his military forces, which are battling a rebel uprising in the North African country. Arab Banking got an exemption that allows the firm to continue operating while barring it from engaging in any transactions with the Libyan government, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
Gud bless Libya and Obama
Sanders Reacts
“It is incomprehensible to me that while creditworthy small businesses in Vermont and throughout the country could not receive affordable loans, the Federal Reserve was providing tens of billions of dollars in credit to a bank that is substantially owned by the Central Bank of Libya,” Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, wrote in a letter to Fed and U.S. officials.
The letter was addressed to Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and John Walsh, acting comptroller of the currency. The figure refers to the aggregate amount of loans the bank received under U.S. lending programs. Arab Banking, known as ABC, owed about $4 billion to the Fed under other bailout programs in the fall of 2009, data released in December show.
“ABC has a robust balance sheet, is amply capitalized and currently maintains a comfortable liquidity position,” the company said in an e-mailed statement. “ABC currently has no outstanding loans under any Federal Reserve, or other, emergency lending program.”
Libya’s Stake
Jack Gutt, a spokesman for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, declined to comment. Arab Banking said Dec. 2 that Libya’s stake in the Manama, Bahrain-based lender had increased to 59 percent.
Washington (CNSNews.com) – A political review of open records requests smacks of “Nixonian” tactics by the Department of Homeland Security, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said Thursday.
Two investigations found that Freedom of Information Act requests sent to the DHS were reviewed by Obama administration political appointees.
“Through the course of an eight-month investigation, the committee has learned that political staff under the DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano have corrupted the agency’s FOIA compliance procedures, exerted unlawful political pressure, on FOIA compliance officers, and undermined the federal government’s accountability to the American people,” Issa said.“These events have nurtured a fragile – and at times hostile – work environment that does not serve to fulfill the department’s primary mission to secure the nation from the many threats we face,” he added.
The department’s Office of Inspector General found that many records requests were filtered through Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano’s office.
This administration is nothing but crooks!
Two investigations found that Freedom of Information Act requests sent to the DHS were reviewed by Obama administration political appointees.
“Through the course of an eight-month investigation, the committee has learned that political staff under the DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano have corrupted the agency’s FOIA compliance procedures, exerted unlawful political pressure, on FOIA compliance officers, and undermined the federal government’s accountability to the American people,” Issa said.“These events have nurtured a fragile – and at times hostile – work environment that does not serve to fulfill the department’s primary mission to secure the nation from the many threats we face,” he added.
The department’s Office of Inspector General found that many records requests were filtered through Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano’s office.
This administration is nothing but crooks!
Gallup Finds U.S. Unemployment Rate at 10.0% in MarchUnderemployment falls to 19.3% from 19.9% at the end of Februaryby Dennis Jacobe, Chief Economist
PRINCETON, NJ -- Unemployment, as measured by Gallup without seasonal adjustment, was 10.0% in March -- down from 10.2% in mid-March and 10.3% at the end of February, but above the 9.8% at the end of January. U.S. unemployment was 10.4% at the end of March a year ago.
The percentage of part-time workers who want full-time work was 9.3% at the end of March -- down from 9.7% in mid-March and 9.6% in both February measurements. The current percentage remains higher than the 9.1% at the end of January but lower than the 10.0% of a year ago.
Implications
ADP on Wednesday reported that U.S. private-sector jobs increased by 201,000 in March -- the third consecutive month at this level of job growth. At the same time, Challenger, Gray & Christmas showed a sharp decline in March U.S. layoffs compared with last year. All of this is consistent with Gallup's Job Creation Index, which has shown slightly more jobs being created and comparatively low layoffs during the first quarter of 2011.
However, contrary to the federal government's recent job reports, Gallup's unemployment and underemployment measures suggest that recent job increases have not been sufficient to significantly improve the jobs situation so far in 2011. Although both of Gallup's measures were marginally better in March, they remain higher now than they were in January.
The March improvement in the jobs situation compared with February may be partly the result of seasonal hiring patterns, with companies increasing their hiring at this time of year. However, the 2010 jobs situation didn't show substantial improvement until the second half of April. Regardless, the decline in the underemployment rate year-over-year is consistent with a cautious hiring approach in which employers avoid layoffs while taking on more part-time workers and limiting their hiring of full-time employees.
Despite the March uptick, Gallup's view of the U.S. jobs situation remains substantially less optimistic than the government's recent unemployment report might suggest. Added to this, late March Gallup Daily tracking results show a continuing decline in economic optimism, a pullback in consumer spending, and a drop in Gallup's Job Creation Index. This suggests that recent behavior on Main Street does not reflect the government's rosier assessment. It also implies that the recent marginal improvement Gallup finds may be more temporary than one might hope.
Survey Methods
Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking from Feb. 28-March 29, 2011, with a random sample of 17,811 adults in the workforce, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using random-digit-dial sampling. Results are reported in 30-day rolling averages.
Gallup classifies American workers as underemployed if they are either unemployed or working part time but wanting full-time work. Gallup's results are not seasonally adjusted and are ahead of government reports by approximately two weeks.
For results based on the total sample of workers, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each daily sample includes a minimum quota of 200 cell phone respondents and 800 landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas among landline respondents for gender within region. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member
Obummer really needs to quit focusing on battery powered cars and focus on jobs...JOBS JOBS!
PRINCETON, NJ -- Unemployment, as measured by Gallup without seasonal adjustment, was 10.0% in March -- down from 10.2% in mid-March and 10.3% at the end of February, but above the 9.8% at the end of January. U.S. unemployment was 10.4% at the end of March a year ago.
The percentage of part-time workers who want full-time work was 9.3% at the end of March -- down from 9.7% in mid-March and 9.6% in both February measurements. The current percentage remains higher than the 9.1% at the end of January but lower than the 10.0% of a year ago.
Implications
ADP on Wednesday reported that U.S. private-sector jobs increased by 201,000 in March -- the third consecutive month at this level of job growth. At the same time, Challenger, Gray & Christmas showed a sharp decline in March U.S. layoffs compared with last year. All of this is consistent with Gallup's Job Creation Index, which has shown slightly more jobs being created and comparatively low layoffs during the first quarter of 2011.
However, contrary to the federal government's recent job reports, Gallup's unemployment and underemployment measures suggest that recent job increases have not been sufficient to significantly improve the jobs situation so far in 2011. Although both of Gallup's measures were marginally better in March, they remain higher now than they were in January.
The March improvement in the jobs situation compared with February may be partly the result of seasonal hiring patterns, with companies increasing their hiring at this time of year. However, the 2010 jobs situation didn't show substantial improvement until the second half of April. Regardless, the decline in the underemployment rate year-over-year is consistent with a cautious hiring approach in which employers avoid layoffs while taking on more part-time workers and limiting their hiring of full-time employees.
Despite the March uptick, Gallup's view of the U.S. jobs situation remains substantially less optimistic than the government's recent unemployment report might suggest. Added to this, late March Gallup Daily tracking results show a continuing decline in economic optimism, a pullback in consumer spending, and a drop in Gallup's Job Creation Index. This suggests that recent behavior on Main Street does not reflect the government's rosier assessment. It also implies that the recent marginal improvement Gallup finds may be more temporary than one might hope.
Survey Methods
Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking from Feb. 28-March 29, 2011, with a random sample of 17,811 adults in the workforce, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using random-digit-dial sampling. Results are reported in 30-day rolling averages.
Gallup classifies American workers as underemployed if they are either unemployed or working part time but wanting full-time work. Gallup's results are not seasonally adjusted and are ahead of government reports by approximately two weeks.
For results based on the total sample of workers, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each daily sample includes a minimum quota of 200 cell phone respondents and 800 landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas among landline respondents for gender within region. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member
Obummer really needs to quit focusing on battery powered cars and focus on jobs...JOBS JOBS!
leigh2154: Just found this Fudwise...I love it....!! What a little doll, I would sure like to meet her...wonder if she does mail orders??!!??!!! I would like to support the cause!!
Hopefully the union doesn't burn down her business. They've done worse. Ask Hoffa.
leigh2154: Just found this Fudwise...I love it....!! What a little doll, I would sure like to meet her...wonder if she does mail orders??!!??!!! I would like to support the cause!!
I doubt she does. It sounds like a little "mom and pop" store, w/o the "pop".
The man of Honor, Neal Boortz comes on here at 6:00.
This might link you up to him on your puter.
He's a friggin hoot. He's from the "church of the painful truth"... as he says it!
This might link you up to him on your puter.
He's a friggin hoot. He's from the "church of the painful truth"... as he says it!
leigh2154: Thanks...going to go see if I can find it...
He's on a "rant" now.
leigh2154: Banana backbone.!!!
He's talking about taxing the rich now.
leigh2154: Banana backbone.!!!
he says some funny sh-t and he doesn't even know it's funny
My one and only response to how I feel about Obummer and all the other loser politicians is best summed up in this song:
Warning that destruction could be on America's doorstep because it oppresses “God's chosen people,” Minister Louis Farrakhan, the controversial Nation of Islam leader, defended Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi today, calling the U.S. action in Libya hypocrisy.
Speaking from the pulpit of Chicago's Mosque Maryam, the Nation of Islam's international headquarters, purchased 40 years ago with a $3 million loan from Gadhafi, Farrakhan blamed demons for altering President Barack Obama's moral conscience and driving the assault on Gadhafi, who he calls a brother.“It is a terrible thing for me to hear my brother called all these ugly and filthy names when I can't recognize him as that,” Farrakhan said to the crowd assembled at the mosque on Chicago's South Side. “Even though the current tide is moving against him … how can I refuse to raise my voice in his defense? Why would I back down from those who have given so much?” (I'm sure Obama probably has worshipped there too) <my injection :)
The following year, Gadhafi addressed Nation of Islam members via satellite, lauding Farrakhan for being a “courageous freedom fighter” who galvanized African-Americans at the Million Man March in Washington, D.C., and Muslims in nations around the world. During that speech, Gadhafi panned America for taxing poor people, who the Libyan leader said do not benefit from space exploration or support of “a Hebrew state.”
On Thursday, Farrakhan said scenes from an earthquake- and tsunami-ravaged Japan inspired him to warn the American people about an impending natural disaster that will punish them for their arrogance.
Farrakhan cautioned Obama that he was being used as a pawn to oppress his own people in Africa. He insisted several times that Jews controlled the media and pressured Obama to take so-called humanitarian action in Libya, but not in other places such as the Gaza Strip.
“The stupid mistake we make is assuming the president is the supreme power,” Farrakhan said. “The mad dogs are growling and grinding in Washington, D.C.,” referring to one of Gadhafi's nicknames, “Mad Dog of the Middle East.”
He commended former White House correspondent Helen Thomas for her honesty about Israel and the Palestinians and blamed the Jewish-run media for ousting her. He also commended Gadhafi for plans to nationalize Libya's oil industry to benefit his own people and other poor African nations.
“Gadhafi as a state leader made the statement that he was going to wipe out Benghazi,” she said. “The language was one of sheer brutality and taking no responsibility for protecting his people.”
Farrakhan projected photographs featuring Gadhafi in the cheerful company of European leaders including former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. Brian Endless, an expert in United Nations and security issues in the Middle East and Central Africa at Loyola University, attributed the recent thaw between Gadhafi and U.S. administrations to their mutual animus for Islamic fundamentalism and the al Qaeda terror organization. Libyan intelligence enabled the U.S. to find key Al Qaeda operatives after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Kamm Howard of the National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America lauded Farrakhan for speaking the truth on Thursday. Howard said he believes the rebels are murdering Libyans of African descent and said nations who go against Gadhafi are guilty of ethnic cleansing.
“If one African person is being abused, we're all being abused,” Howard said.
Farrakhan never mentioned ethnic cleansing in his address. But he said he didn't fault Gadhafi for going after “traitors.”Though most members referred any questions to Farrakhan's spokespeople, member Nathan Muhammad of Chicago said he supported everything the Nation of Islam's leader had said.
Speaking from the pulpit of Chicago's Mosque Maryam, the Nation of Islam's international headquarters, purchased 40 years ago with a $3 million loan from Gadhafi, Farrakhan blamed demons for altering President Barack Obama's moral conscience and driving the assault on Gadhafi, who he calls a brother.“It is a terrible thing for me to hear my brother called all these ugly and filthy names when I can't recognize him as that,” Farrakhan said to the crowd assembled at the mosque on Chicago's South Side. “Even though the current tide is moving against him … how can I refuse to raise my voice in his defense? Why would I back down from those who have given so much?” (I'm sure Obama probably has worshipped there too) <my injection :)
The following year, Gadhafi addressed Nation of Islam members via satellite, lauding Farrakhan for being a “courageous freedom fighter” who galvanized African-Americans at the Million Man March in Washington, D.C., and Muslims in nations around the world. During that speech, Gadhafi panned America for taxing poor people, who the Libyan leader said do not benefit from space exploration or support of “a Hebrew state.”
On Thursday, Farrakhan said scenes from an earthquake- and tsunami-ravaged Japan inspired him to warn the American people about an impending natural disaster that will punish them for their arrogance.
Farrakhan cautioned Obama that he was being used as a pawn to oppress his own people in Africa. He insisted several times that Jews controlled the media and pressured Obama to take so-called humanitarian action in Libya, but not in other places such as the Gaza Strip.
“The stupid mistake we make is assuming the president is the supreme power,” Farrakhan said. “The mad dogs are growling and grinding in Washington, D.C.,” referring to one of Gadhafi's nicknames, “Mad Dog of the Middle East.”
He commended former White House correspondent Helen Thomas for her honesty about Israel and the Palestinians and blamed the Jewish-run media for ousting her. He also commended Gadhafi for plans to nationalize Libya's oil industry to benefit his own people and other poor African nations.
“Gadhafi as a state leader made the statement that he was going to wipe out Benghazi,” she said. “The language was one of sheer brutality and taking no responsibility for protecting his people.”
Farrakhan projected photographs featuring Gadhafi in the cheerful company of European leaders including former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. Brian Endless, an expert in United Nations and security issues in the Middle East and Central Africa at Loyola University, attributed the recent thaw between Gadhafi and U.S. administrations to their mutual animus for Islamic fundamentalism and the al Qaeda terror organization. Libyan intelligence enabled the U.S. to find key Al Qaeda operatives after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Kamm Howard of the National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America lauded Farrakhan for speaking the truth on Thursday. Howard said he believes the rebels are murdering Libyans of African descent and said nations who go against Gadhafi are guilty of ethnic cleansing.
“If one African person is being abused, we're all being abused,” Howard said.
Farrakhan never mentioned ethnic cleansing in his address. But he said he didn't fault Gadhafi for going after “traitors.”Though most members referred any questions to Farrakhan's spokespeople, member Nathan Muhammad of Chicago said he supported everything the Nation of Islam's leader had said.
Faithfulness: You're replying to post made by: Hot_Single_Dude
Because I dislike the way you try to destroy the atmospher in here and urge you to leave and never EVER come back
Make your own threads comprende Consuella?
Dude, why do you do that? Someone makes a valid point, states a simple truth about you and you feel the need to tell that person to leave and never come back. Practise what you preach.
Because I dislike the way you try to destroy the atmospher in here and urge you to leave and never EVER come back
Make your own threads comprende Consuella?
Dude, why do you do that? Someone makes a valid point, states a simple truth about you and you feel the need to tell that person to leave and never come back. Practise what you preach.
Freedom of expression must never been tried in order to stop any body expressing thoughts Faith. Katt is all right but instead of expressing her politcal ideas and stuff she keeps picking on me and trying to destry these threads. Best for her will be making her own threads and no bdy stops her doing just that ... I will not even post one single post on her threads I guarantee
Faithfulness: You're replying to a post made by: Hot_Single_Dude
Yes Katt... in the last ten years unfortunatily Ultra Conservatives are runninng the show in this country and when ever and where ever conservative points of view more people going alcoholic and junking their heads off
The political system of Denmark is that of a multi-party structure, where several parties can be represented in Parliament at any one time. Danish governments are often characterised by minority administrations, aided with the help of one or more supporting parties. This means that Danish politics is based on consensus politics. Since 1909, no single party has had the majority in Parliament.
Since 27 November 2001, the present Government has consisted of the parties Venstre and Conservative. Løkke Rasmussen, from the Venstre party has been Prime Minister since 5th April 2009
Yes Katt... in the last ten years unfortunatily Ultra Conservatives are runninng the show in this country and when ever and where ever conservative points of view more people going alcoholic and junking their heads off
The political system of Denmark is that of a multi-party structure, where several parties can be represented in Parliament at any one time. Danish governments are often characterised by minority administrations, aided with the help of one or more supporting parties. This means that Danish politics is based on consensus politics. Since 1909, no single party has had the majority in Parliament.
Since 27 November 2001, the present Government has consisted of the parties Venstre and Conservative. Løkke Rasmussen, from the Venstre party has been Prime Minister since 5th April 2009
No matter those facts you bringing in ... majority rules of course.
Conrad73: Solar Cars!
What was ur education exaclty Grumpy? the dang Libertarian acts as a cry baby and a bum who have never studied a single page all life for god sake!
Holen Sie sich ein neues Gehirn so schnell wie möglich Opa ... wobei ein verdammt Freak wirklich zu Ihnen passt und noch diese alte ... absolut empört
ttom500: Why cannot we get a new political term for pot and kettle thingee?
Let us at least be creative. Besides after the 2010 mid term.....
the REP and Tea Party got their kettles and pots all shined up.
that massive conservative voter turn out and 60/40 results put a lot of brilo pads to their cutlery.
And you Hero Reagan lost both houses back then mister fogetting what ever does not suit you Let us at least be creative. Besides after the 2010 mid term.....
the REP and Tea Party got their kettles and pots all shined up.
that massive conservative voter turn out and 60/40 results put a lot of brilo pads to their cutlery.
Hot_Single_Dude: And you Hero Reagan lost both houses back then mister fogetting what ever does not suit you
And still did his job effectively...something obummer has yet to do.
Actractorguy: So can we get a picture of a windmill providing homes. Oh wait.
That windmill powers dude's computer. The other 25 in his yard take care of the rest of the house.
Yemen next Dude? alQaida is claiming it controla a province in eastern Yemen. It has used the political unrest to gain control of the province.
I think we need to make more aircraft carriers.....there are 54 Muslim countries....54 aircraft carriers seems about right.
I think we need to make more aircraft carriers.....there are 54 Muslim countries....54 aircraft carriers seems about right.
ttom500: Yemen next Dude? alQaida is claiming it controla a province in eastern Yemen. It has used the political unrest to gain control of the province.
I think we need to make more aircraft carriers.....there are 54 Muslim countries....54 aircraft carriers seems about right.
I think we need to make more aircraft carriers.....there are 54 Muslim countries....54 aircraft carriers seems about right.
We won't invade Yemen. Obama has a "buddy" there. They're safe from U.S. attacks.
leigh2154: Obama military strategy at your service....I'll wait and see how this all plays out...! Where are my clubs Michelle?!!
Even a president needs calm and vacation once in a while ... ttom500: We will not invade Libya, Obama has a buddy there as well. We
are getting out of Iraq, Obama has a buddy there. We will be pushed out of Behrain, Obama has let that go. Kuwait is no longer our buddy. Out soon there. Egypt is going to give us the boot soon enough when the Muslim Brotherhood take over. Pakistan is tired
of us, is arresting CIA agents for self defense.
Afghanistan will still welcoming us as long as we bring
checkbooks.
I would say President Obama's foreign policy has been a success...for radical Islam, for Iran and for alQaida.
are getting out of Iraq, Obama has a buddy there. We will be pushed out of Behrain, Obama has let that go. Kuwait is no longer our buddy. Out soon there. Egypt is going to give us the boot soon enough when the Muslim Brotherhood take over. Pakistan is tired
of us, is arresting CIA agents for self defense.
Afghanistan will still welcoming us as long as we bring
checkbooks.
I would say President Obama's foreign policy has been a success...for radical Islam, for Iran and for alQaida.
Just the way he wants it.
RayfromUSA: And you're trying to tell Americans what they should do politically when your own country is such a mess?
You're as bad as Obama.
No experience, no success, no support, but still pretending to have all the answers.
You're as bad as Obama.
No experience, no success, no support, but still pretending to have all the answers.
No Ray... America was really lucky got rid of those Dang stupid Ultra cons back in year 2008... in Denmark we are still working on it... not a real mess but pretty messy for sure. I am telling you NEVER give a country to right winged cause they just messing it up and making the whole country going bank rupted. the system here though... I mean what ever wellfare is deifnately not because of the current powerholders or created by them what so ever when all counts and it is a social democratic system the current government tries it,s best to destroy beyong recogntion... but before they ever success finishing it off... they wil be kicked far and a way form powerI promise you.
leigh2154: Great TT..I am counting my money...my bet with Dude yesterday.....$500 big ones when Obama becomes the thirteenth one term President!!!
YES WE CAN!!!!
CANCAN!!!!!
YES WE CAN!!!!
CANCAN!!!!!
You are DEFINATELY going to loose this bet and I am going to laugh out loudwhen Obama wins again in 2012.
Ccincy: Why would the CIA be in Libya?
Making sure right targets are hit and civilain casualties being avoided and beside helping the opposition getting organised agaisnt the Tyran.Got to sleep! May the Force being with you all 
Hot_Single_Dude: You are DEFINATELY going to loose this bet and I am going to laugh out loudwhen Obama wins again in 2012.
Can...Can...Can...WIN THE BET!!!!!!
GoooooooooooooooMitt, GooooooooooooDonald, GooooooooooooTim !!!
Yea Team!!!!
Hot_Single_Dude: And Republicans creating f-ck ups being their voter sheeps destroying their own lives even
If you're not focused on gentials, then you're focused on sheep.
More Threads
Feel Good Music
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
your personality
men's perspective towards women
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
Common Issues with the BMW X1
wanting beyond need
the way you look
The Best of the GOP
Sleepy Don!
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
They say they will agree to a ceasefire if Qdaffi pulls his forces out the cities and town and allows peaceful protest. Right up the line of thought of President Obama and the west.
They still want him to go. But have not told the world were they want him to go.
Rebells were keeping Journalists away from the fighting.....and the fluid conflict lines in the Libyan sand are undefined. Already several journalists have turned missing.
Qdaffi's regimes seems to be leaving faster than he is. Two senior level advisors decided to come to the west for a holiday s and to give info on Qdaffi past terrorist connections. Am sure the Lockerbie bomber name has been dropped more than once in their debriefings.
So the speculation is that the regime is crumpling from within.
Yes.......Qdaffi has 1000s of supporters and two leaving is going to change this how? He will appoint the heroic 18 yo private to replace them and move on.
So will Qdaffi take the rebell up on their offer of a ceasefire.
The military side of me says no. His forces have abandoned the tanks and personnel carrier for private vehicles and have shed uniforms for civilian garb. This to halt the bombing of the US and others. They basicaly pulled a Iragi melt into the civilians.
Now they simply inflitrate a city or town...till enough forces are in in place to fight. So not much a guy at 40K at mach 1 can do here. This is the rebells cleaning up on the ground time.
That they are asking for a ceasefire is not a good. Shows that this melt tactic is giving them problems and they want time to consolidate their positions. So the military side of me, says Qdaffi will reject the ceasefire offer.
On the other side of the issue, Qdaffi is nuttier than auntie's Christmas fruit cake. So he just might take the rebells up on the ceasefire. If he thinks that later he will be in a stronger position to suppress the rebellion or there is vast international gain for him doing so. Or if it is his get out Libya card with his head attached and neck not stretched.
No word from either the US or EU on their position on the rebell offer of a ceasefire. Surely this is dicey diplomacy time. The US sent in Hillary to meet with the rebell leaders in London. So the west may already know about the ceasefire proposal.
That Qdaffi is not offering Disney movie and book rights on the last 30 days of Libyan history. Has to say something as well.
This has been a very bloody and deadly rebellion. The ceasefire might look good to him for world PR purposes.