Disecting the obama legacy. pick something and discuss it. (83)
Bane6: Don't know about the Exalted one. Either way you cut it he was still left with a nice pile of steaming crap...
I posted on the wrong response:
Here ya go!
You are correct Ray in that sadly I doubt if either of them will ever go on trial in this life.
Most Presidents and Leaders are judged after their death…sometimes 50 years later. This war crime act by Obama is occurring in real time though. There are many peeved Congressmen and people in the USA right now that want to seek Justice on Obama before he leaves office.
You are right that he will probably get away with it. Congress is a bunch of chickens in situations like this because they mostly don’t want their heads cut off before the next election.
This reminds me of how Bill Clinton got away with the Monica Lewinski affair.
Most Presidents and Leaders are judged after their death…sometimes 50 years later. This war crime act by Obama is occurring in real time though. There are many peeved Congressmen and people in the USA right now that want to seek Justice on Obama before he leaves office.
You are right that he will probably get away with it. Congress is a bunch of chickens in situations like this because they mostly don’t want their heads cut off before the next election.
This reminds me of how Bill Clinton got away with the Monica Lewinski affair.
Ccincy: Obama will have only done one good thing for this country that is when he loses the election.
Oh come on, he will have taught us a lot of valuable lessons on what not to do.
RayfromUSA: Oh come on, he will have taught us a lot of valuable lessons on what not to do.
Yes and so will whomever ends up as the Republican President too.
Neither party is lily white.
RayfromUSA: Now, as the Obama era approaches its end (unless they declare martial law and seize dictatorial control) It's a good time to objectively look at the effects that he and his gang have had on the nation.
what about his great leap into fascism
jvaski: She's a sensationalist who attacked Obama twice - without any evidence to back her claims
Where is your Evidence that she didn't have any Evidence?
Show the video, audio or link jvaski
A Liberal you are...stop hanging onto Obama. He is toast to many Americans. Most of CA is a bunch of Liberal freaks that can't control their own economy.
And stop posting rude comments about Michele. That will only get you in trouble. Obama is afraid of Michele and the other Republican candidates.
And also, by the way, other Democrats plan to challenge Obama.
BizPacReview.com exclusive: Bachmann calls Obama's response to recent terrorist attack "pathetic"
A Liberal you are...stop hanging onto Obama. He is toast to many Americans. Most of CA is a bunch of Liberal freaks that can't control their own economy.
And stop posting rude comments about Michele. That will only get you in trouble. Obama is afraid of Michele and the other Republican candidates.
And also, by the way, other Democrats plan to challenge Obama.
BizPacReview.com exclusive: Bachmann calls Obama's response to recent terrorist attack "pathetic"
/
Ccincy: Yes and so will whomever ends up as the Republican President too.
Neither party is lily white.
Neither party is lily white.
Agreed.
In the "False Left-Right Paradigm" the Republican and Democrat parties share common interests and goals, as well as a covertly unified ruling authority over the political issues of the masses. The two parties act in concert to create divisiveness among the population while, all the while retaining total control of the political spectrum.
By exaggerating the supposed differences between the two embedded parties, the ruling oligarchy (from both parties) obscure political clarity and divide any unity among the masses. The tactic creates confusion and frustration among the population, and enables the ruling class to increase and consolidate their wealth and power.
In essence the two party paradigm limits all political discussion to a few extremely minor points while hiding the existence of more important issues.
It's rather like a stage magician who draws all attention to what he's doing with one hand while meanwhile an elephant is being led offstage behind a curtain and the magician's other hand is taking a rabbit out of a secret compartment. Heavy emphasis on the unimportant, diverts attention from what's really happening.
RayfromUSA: Agreed.
In the "False Left-Right Paradigm" the Republican and Democrat parties share common interests and goals, as well as a covertly unified ruling authority over the political issues of the masses. The two parties act in concert to create divisiveness among the population while, all the while retaining total control of the political spectrum.
By exaggerating the supposed differences between the two embedded parties, the ruling oligarchy (from both parties) obscure political clarity and divide any unity among the masses. The tactic creates confusion and frustration among the population, and enables the ruling class to increase and consolidate their wealth and power.
In essence the two party paradigm limits all political discussion to a few extremely minor points while hiding the existence of more important issues.
It's rather like a stage magician who draws all attention to what he's doing with one hand while meanwhile an elephant is being led offstage behind a curtain and the magician's other hand is taking a rabbit out of a secret compartment. Heavy emphasis on the unimportant, diverts attention from what's really happening.
In the "False Left-Right Paradigm" the Republican and Democrat parties share common interests and goals, as well as a covertly unified ruling authority over the political issues of the masses. The two parties act in concert to create divisiveness among the population while, all the while retaining total control of the political spectrum.
By exaggerating the supposed differences between the two embedded parties, the ruling oligarchy (from both parties) obscure political clarity and divide any unity among the masses. The tactic creates confusion and frustration among the population, and enables the ruling class to increase and consolidate their wealth and power.
In essence the two party paradigm limits all political discussion to a few extremely minor points while hiding the existence of more important issues.
It's rather like a stage magician who draws all attention to what he's doing with one hand while meanwhile an elephant is being led offstage behind a curtain and the magician's other hand is taking a rabbit out of a secret compartment. Heavy emphasis on the unimportant, diverts attention from what's really happening.
Both parties cater mostly to big businesses and whoever else supports they're campaign.
Buffy327: So hard to discuss politics with some peeps think like this.... Don't U just love those good ole FAMILY VALUES AND CHRISTIAN MORALS....
No Obama did not have to take the job, and if he had been smart, he would have walked away from 8 years of mess left behind. Don't think he did not know it was going to be a mess from hell....The American public is so spoiled they want immediate results and every economist in the world will say it is going to take time....I guess it is easy to BLAME our PRESIDENT for everything, rather than take some of the responsibility ourselves....Depressions and Recessions happens folks...AND don't think many of us on here did not benefit as well, for the good times...
No Obama did not have to take the job, and if he had been smart, he would have walked away from 8 years of mess left behind. Don't think he did not know it was going to be a mess from hell....The American public is so spoiled they want immediate results and every economist in the world will say it is going to take time....I guess it is easy to BLAME our PRESIDENT for everything, rather than take some of the responsibility ourselves....Depressions and Recessions happens folks...AND don't think many of us on here did not benefit as well, for the good times...
Buffy327: So hard to discuss politics with some peeps think like this.... Don't U just love those good ole FAMILY VALUES AND CHRISTIAN MORALS....
No Obama did not have to take the job, and if he had been smart, he would have walked away from 8 years of mess left behind. Don't think he did not know it was going to be a mess from hell....The American public is so spoiled they want immediate results and every economist in the world will say it is going to take time....I guess it is easy to BLAME our PRESIDENT for everything, rather than take some of the responsibility ourselves....Depressions and Recessions happens folks...AND don't think many of us on here did not benefit as well, for the good times...
No Obama did not have to take the job, and if he had been smart, he would have walked away from 8 years of mess left behind. Don't think he did not know it was going to be a mess from hell....The American public is so spoiled they want immediate results and every economist in the world will say it is going to take time....I guess it is easy to BLAME our PRESIDENT for everything, rather than take some of the responsibility ourselves....Depressions and Recessions happens folks...AND don't think many of us on here did not benefit as well, for the good times...
I don't put all the blame on whomever ends up being the leader.WE're to blame for voting the very same people into office and over again when they've done wrong.WE have to learn to take most of the responsiblity ourselves.
I most people blame whomver it is rather then take the blame too.
Ccincy: Both parties cater mostly to big businesses and whoever else supports they're campaign.
Bailout went to maily Wallstreet where the biggest Contributors of the Obama Campaign were located!Wasn't a Bailout,but an Election-payoff(-back).
The Exalted one got himself Elected with Billions of US-Taxpayer's Money!
Conrad73: Bailout went mainly to Wallstreet where the biggest Contributors of the Obama Campaign were located!
Wasn't a Bailout,but an Election-payoff(-back).
The Exalted one got himself Elected with Billions of US-Taxpayer's Money!
Wasn't a Bailout,but an Election-payoff(-back).
The Exalted one got himself Elected with Billions of US-Taxpayer's Money!
Conrad73: Bailout went to maily Wallstreet where the biggest Contributors of the Obama Campaign were located!
Wasn't a Bailout,but an Election-payoff(-back).
The Exalted one got himself Elected with Billions of US-Taxpayer's Money!
Wasn't a Bailout,but an Election-payoff(-back).
The Exalted one got himself Elected with Billions of US-Taxpayer's Money!
That explains it.
Conrad73:
Bailout went mainly to Wallstreet where the biggest Contributors of the Obama Campaign were located!
Wasn't a Bailout,but an Election-payoff(-back).
The Exalted one got himself Elected with Billions of US-Taxpayer's Money!
Yep. And so did Bush before him, using a somewhat different scam in which large Industries paid his election costs and then got reimbursed with huge government contracts once the pre-planned "War on Terror" got rolling.
Bailout went mainly to Wallstreet where the biggest Contributors of the Obama Campaign were located!
Wasn't a Bailout,but an Election-payoff(-back).
The Exalted one got himself Elected with Billions of US-Taxpayer's Money!
Yep. And so did Bush before him, using a somewhat different scam in which large Industries paid his election costs and then got reimbursed with huge government contracts once the pre-planned "War on Terror" got rolling.
Ccincy: That explains it.
Goldman Sachs and AIG Team Up on the US Taxpayer
jvaski: He didn't do very well in the presidential debate the other day ......in fact all of em didn't.......their strongest points were just more Obama bashing - not real solutions .....
Because he didn't use the words "use more tax money"....doesn't mean he didn't have solutions.
jvaski: She's a sensationalist who attacked Obama twice - without any evidence to back her claims
Maybe republicans are wising up and using the democrat play book?
jvaski: She's a sensationalist who attacked Obama twice - without any evidence to back her claims
Who needs evidence to prove what Obama's done cause it sticks out like a sore thumb.
Legacy ? Skidmark on tighty whities of American history.
Obama will make America history.
You say Osama I say Obama
you say tornado I say tomato
lets call the whole thing off.
Obama will make America history.
You say Osama I say Obama
you say tornado I say tomato
lets call the whole thing off.
Faithfulness: Good point. I was taught that if I don't have anything nice to say not to say anything. So there you have it.
R was looking over my shoulder last night when I was responding to a post on an Obama thread and said,"For crying out loud, if you don't have anything nice to say will you at least use spell check?"
he ought to Impeach himself!
More Threads
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
Ladies
Why is this shameful?
men's perspective towards women
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
wanting beyond need
The weird and the random facts around the world
Kultur-multur
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Related Forums
- Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
- Ladies
- Why is this shameful?
- men's perspective towards women
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
- wanting beyond need
- The weird and the random facts around the world
- Kultur-multur
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
Obama will go on trial before President Bush does.
/
Sadly I doubt if either of them will ever go on trial in this life.
Congress could cut off funding.
They could censure Obama.
They could even impeach him.
But they aren't doing anything but whine a little.
That's because, even though they put on a little pretense, the Congress is just as globalist controlled as Obama.
They are on the same team.
We the people are the opposition.