Wading through that tangled morass of words, I *believe* you're complaining about people setting age ranges that exclude reasonable possibilities...or perhaps that older people should be more open to those of their own age...? In any case, where does the "pretending" come in (that they are pretending they belong with someone younger?)...?
Well, that's a pretty damn good possible counterexample to what I've been saying, Mystical. I've experienced that a lot of late myself - feeling overwhelmed by what seem purely like good emotions...the kind of feeling an Olympic athlete has when he or she cries upon winning a medal, or the way I bawled like a baby when I win $5 with lottery ticket...
So what really is going on when we cry out of apparent happiness? Very interesting question...and for once I'm at a loss for words.. (For those who feel they must comment on that.)
Hmmmm...well, granted the man would likely have a very difficult time proving conclusively that a woman indulged in such perfidy (of course that would be theoretically possible). So the interesting question is what we think would be right *given* that we know the woman committed the subterfuge specified in the hypothetical. I think that was the OP's intention, but one never knows. That's how I took it anyhow.
Sure, it's a fact (that is, the claims are either factual or non-factual). We may just not know which is the case. The hypothetical in question specifies that the lady lied. That we, as third-person observers, may not know the truth doesn't alter the hypothetical.
She is puzzled, and asked a question pertaining to what she was feeling. She wondered if it was possible for love, in sufficient intensities, to cause pain.
I don't think there's any reason to believe that love, per se, causes pain. If love causes pain, then why not every benevolent emotion, such as affection or like or even bliss? Perhaps one can be blissfully depressed or joyously unhappy? Perhaps pleasure itself can be painful?
Yet a deeper issue lurks beneath this discussion of love - namely, its origins: Why do we love? One could reasonably speculate, I think, that all our emotions are tied evolutionarily to survival. Clearly lower animals care about their progeny because it allows their species to survive. Affection aids in cooperation and health in an animal community. But beyond that, it is likely that the uniquely intense human variation of attachment - love - is fundamentally a response to discomfort...to wit, the discomfort we have in the presence of uncertainty and our own mortality.
If this is true, then one could argue that love has its genesis in a kind of pain, but that doesn't demonstrate that it is inherently painful itself....
For me, it's usually the fingers. When the index finger and ring finger are curled inward and the middle finger is held straight - then turned in my direction - I can literally sense the individual's disgust for me.
But I think you're saying the love itself hurts. Why should an intense feeling hurt in itself, unless there's something inherently unpleasant about it (e.g., intensely enjoying a ski run as opposed to intensely disliking root canal surgery). So what's inherently unpleasant about the sensation of love (or is feeling another person from the inside out unpleasant? Certainly doesn't sound particularly sanitary )
Thanks, Dru. I can only hope a certain someone has heard my heart-throbbing scream of loneliness and will agree to see me more often, before my convulsing arms turn on myself...
RE: Pretending Who You Are Not!
Wading through that tangled morass of words, I *believe* you're complaining about people setting age ranges that exclude reasonable possibilities...or perhaps that older people should be more open to those of their own age...? In any case, where does the "pretending" come in (that they are pretending they belong with someone younger?)...?