C'mon...many IQ test questions echo standard operations in matrices, like finding the determinant of a 3x3 matrix. Anyone who has seen those will have an advantage.
His IQ is clearly lacking, or else he'd have known that a nation's IQ is also a result of its welfare. In other words, there is correlation, no causation.
I don't have the right to know all the facts, and besides, there are no facts as such; decisions are often irrational, with subconscious motives and influenced by many factors that can never be accounted for. Once I realize I can't control the outcome, and once my self-esteem is not in the line, I can safely give up asking for all the facts. JMO
I wouldn't call it sugarcoating necessarily. If we were perfect, speaking up our minds without any restraint would be the most appropriate. But we are far from it, and in fact our knowledge and understanding and compassion are very limited. That's why it's not always a bad idea to keep our "truth" to ourselves, instead of spelling it out.
Being truthful is the best, yet there are many ways to deliver the truth. Being blunt and direct is not always the most appropriate. This is my general view on the subject and it's not aimed personally at you
Depends on the personalities of the people involved and the circumstance. Being infatuated with someone online is clearly possible, or else there would be no scammers
I understand people wanting to leave...there is lots of nastiness sometimes, especially in political/religious threads. It's hard not to be disappointed by people, and yet there are others that are worthy of your time and make you wanna stay.
Ron_de_Jeremy Forum Posts (381)
ooops, sorry... 
It's so arrogant of us to think of ourselves as the only conduits of truth.
I did my best
RE: IQ vs.IQ,-1870 or 2011,-STILL THE SAME?
I know these 2 only