Trump was the worst, not the best. The depths of his treachery and dishonesty are continually being plumbed. Who would have thought that a president would be so ignorant and so evil as to steal the documents he stashed carelessly in his moldy country club? And that's on top of trying to steal an election.
He was already rated 4th worst president in history (per a poll of presidential historians) after he lost in 2020. Since then, as more of his wrongdoing is exposed, I'm sure that will move him all the way to the bottom.
Worst US president in history. And yes he is a sociopath. Read "The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump," with contributions by 27 psychiatrists who reflect on Trump's dangerously unstable mental state.
That's an objective view, based on his own behaviors, and the excuses of his lemming-like followers make no difference.
Trump's unpopularity and his legal downfall are due to his own failings, both as a leader and as a human being.
His legacy is still to be written, but he's already the worst president in history.
No contest.
Add dereliction of duty to all his other crimes, any one of which would be sufficient to bar him from holding office, and some of which should result in criminal indictment. The CiC failed/refused to do his duty, resulting in death, disability, and emotional trauma to those present. The whole country was stunned and horrified.
He wanted his MAGA misfits to be allowed to continue their mayhem, with the eventual result of stopping the certification of the vote. If not accomplished by midnight, that would have thrown the country into a Constitutional crisis. Our Founding Fathers made no provision for a president who would not respect the peaceful transfer of power. Trump's evil is on an order of magnitude they did not foresee.
Trump will not be allowed to get away with this treachery.
Experts are predicting the Georgia investigation may result in the first criminal charges. The long recorded phone call is a prosecutor's dream. There's no defense for Trump trying to wheedle, whine, and threaten Georgia election officials into throwing him votes that were lawfully cast for President Biden.
Ray, you spend a lot of time with these photos, don't you.
Keeps you from having to face the historically shocking, ongoing downfall of the worst president in history--you know, the one who lies 24/7, tried to steal an election, summoned a mob to destroy the government so he could be king for life, endangered the lives of Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi, LE, etc.
Trump won't return to power, ever. I assume you haven't been watching the hearings. Trump's crimes are being exposed through sworn testimony, electronic comms, videotape, and print material.
The witnesses have first-hand testimony and many of them are from Trump's own inner circle. If you can refute the statements of Rosen, Donaghue, Hershmann, et al, then please do so here.
Give us a reasoned explanation for the secret meeting Trump held late on the night of December 18 with his favorite MAGA nuts--Giuliani, Powell, Flynn, and a former Overstock CEO. Trump's real attorney, Pat Cippolone, learned of the meeting and broke it up. Less than an hour after this meeting, Trump began summoning his MAGA cultists to DC on January 6, promising them "Be there, it will be wild."
Bannon took up the call on his podcast. If you haven't heard this sociopath spreading the word about January 6, this is another gap in your knowledge of the seditious criminal conspiracy of which Trump was the head. Bannon is also on record stating that if Trump lost, he would just say he won. Sound familiar?
Remember the Constitution you swore to uphold? Trump also took that oath. You have forgotten what that means.
Trump trashed the Constitution. He tried six ways to Sunday to steal the election. There is no defense for this loser.
Which does not add to his credibility or patriotism one whit. It does not make him more "American."
Being in the armed services is not a character reference. Timothy McVeigh was a veteran. There are veterans among the thugs who participated in the January 6 insurrection.
My husband was a career infantry officer, an airborne ranger who served two tours in III Corps Tactical Zone, He earned a CIB, a Bronze star with V for valor, etc.
Before he died from Agent Orange related illnesses, he expressed utter and complete contempt for Donald J. Trump, for his draft dodging, his ignorance, and his humping of the US flag in lieu of showing it respect.
Serving in the military is a career choice. It may or may not be heroic or admirable. And it is not a qualification to vouch for anything in a video.
Nothing can change the fact that 2000 Mules is rubbish.
The Select Committee hearings scare you to death. The sworn testimony, even after only two televised hearings, damns Trump to hell, where he belongs for trying to destroy the country. You fear the truth. Your idol Trump has feet of clay.
In fact, Trump is nothing but clay. He's dirt and we need to brush him from our shoes and reclaim our heritage as the land of the free.
It's essential to prosecute him fully so that he can never again be in any position of power over us. I hope Garland has the cojones and is not hampered by fear of civil war as threatened by Stewart Rhodes and other wanna-be militia bois bonding with one another over their threatened masculinity.
I say a decade of my rosary for President Biden. He shoulders a thankless task.
Distributors are limited by the many factors that affect growth. Availability varies everywhere for that reason. You can't always find your favorites but you can discover new ones.
Budtenders are well schooled and offer not only info on various strains, but can tell you where to find the scarcer hybrids. My lady friend has a medical card and grows her own. All hail the liberals of Washington State.
Usage is more accurate in this context, although "use" would be acceptable.
Usage connotes habitual practice, ongoing or continued "use." Look it up if you doubt it. Raph gets it.
Galrads habitually misuses who/whom, and makes a point of claiming he has it right. Recently he started a thread "Whom is . . . " This obviously sounds cringe-worthy to most people. For those who are grammatically challenged, try this.
A simple rule to chose correctly between who and whom: The best way to remember the difference is with the he/him or she/her rule: If you can replace who or whom in a sentence with he/she then use who. If you can replace it with him/her then use whom.
Applying that rule to the above thread title, you can see that Galrads should have used "who." The pronoun him/her is incorrect, and he/she is correct. Not even he would begin a sentence with "him is."
I'm a published author, an English teacher, and a teacher of expository writing. I'm well-schooled in language and it's important to me because clear communication is important.
The bloviator in this thread title is the author of mangled and confusing comments which result in much needling for him. Maybe he likes the attention regardless, and maybe someday he'll grasp the mysteries of who/whom usage.
You blame the messenger. Dr. Fauci is revered by thinking people, as he has led us stalwartly through the pandemic, undeterred by threats from the paranoid and ill-informed. He's a National Living Treasure.
Yes, President Biden and all intelligent people can say honestly that Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., is the duly elected 46th President of these United States.
Your opinion is irrelevant, and as usual not grounded in facts.
Sworn testimony is not "anyones (sic) written report." You don't seem to understand these proceedings.
Jason Miller was a close aide of Trump's, and a known deadbeat dad. Like the rest of Trump's flunkies, his character is poor. But he was under oath, and others bear out his version of events. Of course it is damaging because it undermines the Big Lie.
Here's the most relevant part of Miller's sworn testimony
Miller was asked if Trump was told that he had lost the election.
"I don't remember who all was present in person. I was in the Oval Office. And at some point in the conversation Matt Oczkowski, who was the lead data person, was brought in, and I remember he delivered to the President in pretty blunt terms that he was going to lose," Miller said.
"And that was based, Mr. Miller, on Matt and the data team's assessment of this sort of county-by-county, state-by-state results as reported?" the investigator asked.
"Correct," said Miller.
You haven't been paying attention or you would know that the committee has this evidence and that of others, all of whom attest that Trump knew all along that he lost the election. They will forward to DOJ their recommendations.
Your use of the word "guilt" in your comment shows you are confused about the committee's function. They are investigatory. They do not have the power to bring any charges, much less "determine guilt."
You literally do not understand how the three branches of government work. Nor do you have any clear understanding of what the January 6 committee is doing, and--most shocking considering your love of Trump--you are unaware of all that has been learned about his actions and those of his unscrupulous cronies.
No one appointed you the arbiter of anyone's opinions, or their grammar.
Earlier in the pandemic you opined that covid mostly took the elderly, and you believed the efforts mobilized to fight it were excessive. Seeing the superficial approach you take to serious issues, I now just scan past your comments.
Comments posted by Mercedes have the ring of authenticity. Yours smack of sheep mentality and at least a touch of misogyny--not to mention ageism.
online today!Myrta Forum Posts (171)
RE: Come on man!
The first of many indictments.NB Note the spelling. It has a t on the end.