jlw45 Forum Posts (15,566)

RE: What song are you listening to,part TRZY!

the beatles----i meme mine.....

RE: God vs. Science

there are other wrightings of jesus and his existence besides the bible....there are roman records of his trial that go hand in hand with the biblical account

RE: greatest funny movie of all time

waking ned devine......

RE: God vs. Science

i cant help it.....you know how i am

RE: God vs. Science

its healthy to debate....AND it stimulates your ''meme's''......

RE: God vs. Science

ooooh, i like zinfindel too....a bit too sweet at times but, it is good....depends on my mood......hey!!...wheres the cheese?

RE: God vs. Science

He is...time has a biginning but, God does'nt....remember?...i believe i've seen where you said you grew up in a ''believing'' home

RE: God vs. Science

damn, B...i dont know if i would let it out that your into he's around here....

RE: God vs. Science

i dont know....but, i sure dont want to go to the church of our blessid jeffery dahmer?.....

RE: God vs. Science

its evidence that you and i both like wine...red wine....although, i dont know about strawberry, but i'll try anything once .....hey, wheres the cheese?

RE: God vs. Science

yep....yes HE does, big time

RE: God vs. Science

i geuss the bottom line is this.....a believer believes....''in the beginning, God.....''.........and the none believer believes.....''in the beginning, DIRT..............'' ......this is an age old argument that surelly wont be finalized by all of our massive brain power and ''meme's''....so, im sure it will continue.....oh, while im thinking about it....the hole ''meme'' thing.....does that mean that we will someday evolve into gods, ourself?......hmmmmm......i wonder if thats just more self worth that some people could be looking for?

RE: God vs. Science

to compair a machanic and science is'nt at all an anecdote, is it?.... but, i get what your trying to say.....although, science can not create life...duplecating ,as in cloning is very impressive ,to say the least, but is not ''creating'' life....

RE: God vs. Science

12000 b.c.? ....hmmm....that date is debatable also....i geuss it would depend on what flawed dating device was used...carbon dating ,for an example, has dated the living tissue of a pinguan as being 1000 sum odd years old...

RE: God vs. Science

it indeed is circular reasoning..... but, what has'nt been so far?

RE: God vs. Science

what i mean by the evadence around us is there are hundreds and hundreds of life forms that cant exist without one or the other....that evolution says one lived without the other for a million years, when it would have been imposible...just a fauge example, but, that was my meaning of evidence...as for evidence of god....the guy from longview texas put it pretty good....i dont subscribe to his theology BUT, thats nether here nor there....the theory of millions and millions of years is badly flawed to say the least...there are knew evidence's comming up all the time of a young earth that, without the bed time story of long long long ago, could only point to a creator.....

RE: greatest funny movie of all time

my fav....''the big lebowski''----by the coen bro's.

RE: God vs. Science

the deal that gets to me is....people are always saying that a believer is always pushing there beliefes off on others.....but, as this thread is evadence off, the opposite is more so....athiest's push there staind far more, and more aggresivelly then believers do....and a believer is supposed to just set back and take it all in stride...the evadence that a creator/designer exist's is all around us....even with the evolutionist's millions and millions of years ''theory'', the probability of all life form deriving from nothing is and what should be, unfathomable......

RE: God vs. Science

i dont know what comic books you've been reading ,canteen boy and as far as ''legitimate scientist's''...that would be another argument

RE: God vs. Science

very well put

RE: God vs. Science

the only thing one can deduce from an archeaological dig and the bones found there, is that the creature that posessed the bones died....that would be a fact....the rest is theory that comes from faulty deductions

RE: God vs. Science

anotherthing to think about as far as genetics go...the argument about, why has'nt anyone wittnessed an evolutionary change ?....certain species can not cross with other species...even within sub-species, when they do cross, there offspring are, more then not, unable to reproduce...that would be more devolving then evolving, would'nt you say?....heres a shocker for you....i believe in evolution but, there is a big diffirence in micro and macro evolution...one is fact, and has been observed...the other is theory, and has never been observed...nor has the scientific community found any evidence of, or they would'nt still call it ''theory''....no matter how you want to define the word....theory is theory...and the scientific community will stay away from the word ''fact'', because it knows it would be shot down in a new york second, as soon as they tried to use it......and thats a FACT

RE: God vs. Science

in human cells, the nucleus contains 99.5% of the DNA. half from the mother and half from the dad...its hard to detirmine wich one contributed what , within the dna strand, because it changes with each generation....however, each cell, outside its nucleus, thousands of tiny energy producing components called mitochondria ...each containing a circular strand of dna...mtDNA ,only comes from the mother...where did she get hers?....from HER mother...and so on and so on....thier are four letters within a dna straind...one copy of a persons mtDNA is 16,559 letters long...sometimes these letters change there order. these changes are passed on to the next generation...these changes help geniticists to identify families...in 1987 a team from berkly published a studycomparing the mtDNA of147 people from 5 diffirent geographical locations...there ''conclusion'' was that all 147 had the same female ancestor...she is what is now referred to as the ''mitochondrial eve''....these mtDNA changes, that i referred to, change at such a rate that it can be mathmatically determined how far back this started....and there conclusion was aproxamatlly 6000 years ago........not millions of years ago, as evolutionists would have us believe....the probability of life as we know it, came from nothing ,has the same probability of a plain crashing into a salvage yard and throwing together a 1981 toyota pick-up truck

RE: God vs. Science

to mike, heres one for them to ponder.....the study of mitochondrialDNA...this study concluded that the ''mitochondrial eve'' lived only, about 6,000 years ago....wich coinsides with biblical wrightings

RE: was the greatest sports person of all time a black man or a white man ? & please be careful how you

its more of a hobby....but, people with a competitive nature can make a sport out of just about anything...

RE: was the greatest sports person of all time a black man or a white man ? & please be careful how you

yea but, a wild animal is just tha...a wild animal....people tend to view them in the same way as domesticated animals and thats where the troubles begin...as long as your always aware of the fact that its a wild animal, you will keep your gaurd up

RE: Write a line------that has inspired you , from whatever source.

i did too but, look what it did to my hair .....

RE: Write a line------that has inspired you , from whatever source.

i'll never get out of this life, alive------hank williams..... now if that wont inspire someone, i dont know what will.....

RE: Instant Messenger on CS

i dont have them, YET....

RE: Instant Messenger on CS

oops....not only am i senile....i cant spell either