Now why did you block me from your "am I a bad girl" column?? I just know in my heart I didn't do or say anything THAT off the wall--(perhaps you just made a mistake..) I'll give you the benefit of the doubt - but just for the record, it is inconsistent with the spirit of this club (CS) to create forums and then start kicking people off without a cause. Would you like that?
Most would agree that humans are more complex; use cognition far more than birds. But consider this: Some birds, especially Bower Birds, build a fantastic "fort" to attract the female. He then struts, and fans his feathers, and does an elaborate dance. Several females are watching, and sometimes there are several males making these nests and doing these shows. But, the female is fussy--she watches intensely and takes a great deal of time in selecting only what she considers to be the very best dancer/prancer/interior decorator, etc... and often doesn't make a choice until she views twenty or so of these. Well, we are selective, too, although I would not categorize it as insanely so, or at least not for some of us.
Thank you lovie, your way was easier...(I am one of these people who can get around anywhere I have a mind to, but I'll be darned if I can tell anyone else how to..)
go to top of page one of this app, see row 2, third choice over is "groups". Tap twice with mouse arrow, and proceed to that page. On left column, go down to appropriate choice category--(LBGT or Gay), mouse tap that, and see what happens. This is probably the best way for you, for this club. Good luck.
Going home to watch "Hot Bench" and make early supper (having pasta with red sauce), mend some jogging sweat pants, clean parrot cage, and have a glass of wine.
Looks: 8.5 (not a model, but not John Candy, either) Personality: 8.5 (somewhere between Steve Martin and Colbert) Intelligence 9.75 (not Eienstein, but not Dubayuh,,ha ha)
could you expand, or are you just saying that in a general term? (I realize there are people who do not think that same-gender relationships are cool, and I do respect that not all of us agree on all things, FYI--)
Hi anyone and everyone. This is just a short story, and a polite request for your opinions and comments after. (Please be cool and chillax about it, though, OK?)
For a couple of weeks I have been corresponding to someone who seemed a possible match for me, being only a couple of hours away and easy to travel to, etc... In his last letter he told me of two things going on in his life that were, I am afraid, a deal-breaker. My last letter, just a few minutes ago, was this reply:
"No, you did not offer too much information. I have a non-moral but severe aversion to *(420) in any of its forms. Being even occasionally promiscuous with other people is untenable for me. Too much information? (signed)
Now, for youse guys--was this wrong of me, did it sound terrible, rude, etc... or was I also, being upfront? What do you think. What's done is done, I sent it already, but, for future reference, is this way OK enough, is there a better way? Just wondering. (I don not want to be mean to people, so I am trying to ferret out a better design for my life, please try to understand). thx
I am happiest when I am comfortable and alone at home, (but not necessarily watching t.v.). I am very much a nester, love to read, spend time with my parrot, listen to good music, that sort of thing. The beach and woods are favorite past times, exploring tide pools, having a cook-out, riding my bike, hiking a bit, wild flower searching and identifying, etc... To be honest, probably what I said first is the best--being at home and resting. I am not much of a traveler, and for sure not long distances.
I just knew you could do all that with just one finger--(with your talent and my good looks we could make an absolute FORTUNE)--dang you're so freakin' hot.........
Just for anyone reading--a little commentary about the thread topic.
I am kind of a "prove it to me" guy, so superstitions, card/palm reading and Zodiac signs and so forth are not something I generally put a lot of stock in. HOWEVER, I do find that my particular sign is uncannily spot-on to my personality. (I used to think that anyone could unknowingly read any casting supposedly designed for them and find value in it. I no longer think that as much, anyway, as different signs have completely different traits, etc...) Analysis: Just because something cannot be "scientifically" proven does not necessarily mean it cannot be valid. JMO
If you want or need it too much, it won't happen--or at least, it won't happen the way you really would want for it to. Relationships should enhance our already contented lives, not try to change or define them. JMO
(archaic saying--Love is like a butterfly. If you chase it, it dodges and flits about, and then flies away. If you wait patiently and quietly, it lights upon your shoulder).
As long as the OTHER person is not damaged by it. (I do not mean to sound so adamant about it, but I have seen far too many nice people get badly hurt by someone else needing relief. JMO)
I commend you for reaching out for opinions and views. You ask, "What would you do?" Not to seem or sound arbitrary, that's almost an impossible question, because what someone else may do may not fit or be on the same page as what another would do, or what YOU would do. Here is what I THINK I might do, if it is any help: Probably, assuming the other person was as OK with the circumstances and details as I would be, I would have a clandestine love affair. Hope that in some way helps. Remember, however, that what people may think they are comfortable and "OK" with often turns out to not be the case, and then someone, or both, are damaged. Avoid that.
online today!rohaan Forum Posts (10,536)
YO LINDZI!!
Now why did you block me from your "am I a bad girl" column?? I just know in my heart I didn't do or say anything THAT off the wall--(perhaps you just made a mistake..) I'll give you the benefit of the doubt - but just for the record, it is inconsistent with the spirit of this club (CS) to create forums and then start kicking people off without a cause. Would you like that?