Would it be true then, that Germany after all is self served by its manpower needs due to this result? I wouldn't undermine the deception but the cohorts of being a witness and do nothing is preposterous.
You are right, granting without admitting that US preceded all these actions based on the 9/11, would it suffice to justify their involvement in ME? Now the other scenario: Let us say there is no truth is such a demise, why then the world lay witness to all these imbroglio and not do anything about it? Meaning the G5. Why is it left that the US is continue dealing with it as though it is all on a premise of lie?
Now Europe is suffering the consequences, at least that is what is happening, where is Europe's bureaucrats and politician stand with this?
That's a possibility. In another post, Capri said, the NA section should all be designated as the place. Build housing, complete sustainable living. Then Europe iz not completely inundated and overwhelmed.
Yes indeed Rebel. Now why don't we look at it from a one on one basis: When you allow people to come to your house for help, how many can you avail and when will it cost you more than your asset?
Aragon there are many actions needed to be done, but what specific action would you have in mind to happen right now, every moment and every day, poses a more serious than yesterday. For instance Germany was reported that they are processing papers of these people by the hour, multiply that to 24 hours and look at the impact in a month, year and whenever one can think when will it stop.
We both agree that what is happening in the world today is real, right? At least as far as the migration is concerned. We can't preach idealism to the need of what is going on at the moment. We can appreciate and dream what is ideal, but when it comes to reality unfortunately it doesn't work. What we must do is to carefully look at the effect of what is happening now and how we can fix it for short and long term effect.
Last Friday editorial of the Wall Street Journal, whole page.
Front page is the picture of Merkel with a Syrian Refugee taking a selfie. I don't know how to upload otherwise I would have done it but I will trr.
Call Wall Street Journal and ask them to give you a copy. I have the newspaper as I subscribe to it. And I don't post anything without verification of the date.
Should have been "sue". In other words the political body of the US is sick and tired of the absolute rule this man is doing that it is considering suing him for walking all over the constitution.
Sometimes I fail to see the reason why these terrorists would just blatantly take credit for all the damage and harm they do to the world. Is it a set up? That the culprit are not really who they claim they are? Just a way to justify all the chaos remain unsolved because of economic gain?
I have never failed to question the profitability of wars All. It is preposterous to think that for every 1 billion dollar a day expense there is no such equation to gain. But you are very right, it is not all true what we see on television or read on the papers. In the meantime what the world knows is what they put out there. I am not going to Middle East for the sake of the truth.
But one has to understand that the number of the real refugees, is way too overestimated to the real number. For every one refugee, there is about 100 opportunists who swarm Europe for economic migration. While this to me, is completely understandable, the effect if not curtailed could really make Europe submerged into oblivion...In the real word of the pundits. Europe will lose itself as it is.
You are making a bad judgement here Almera. On some reports it says that: For every one hundred of these migrants, there is probably only one who is a true Syrian refugee.
Read it on the front page of WSJ about how these migrants are posing as Syrian for better entrance. Now that is deception, isn't it?
So when you say we turn our back to those in need. Maybe it is completely wrong to think that they are truly in need.
Now the building of these fences will not be working as an immediate deterrent. More so for the prevention of future migration. In the meantime they are already all here flooding the area.
I just love the way you put things into perspective Obs. Amazing, you are very right, though. One man that causes the headline as oppose to the long term effect of those that will subdue.
Like you said, election is near, but more importantly is how the federal court is now involved on the move of the house to sue him for dishonoring the original provisions of the constitution of which this country is based upon.
Read it on the editorial page of the WSJ last Friday.
10,000 us the magic number that Obama presented for US share to this catastrophic situation in Syria.
The difference in Europe is that these migrants don't cross the border by foot or by boat.
NOTE: Since 2011, only 1,600 had been accepted now 10,000 is proposed by this preposterous president.
(On the editorial note of Fridays WSJ, "the federal court ruling said that Congress can due the president, in order to restore the separation of powers that president Obama has so often subverted".
Have you ever read anything about the History of the UK? England has been welcoming immigrants since the Romans, but there comes a point when the numbers become greater than the space remaining, such a point has now occurred, the UK does not have the finance, the housing nor medical facilities to cope with such a huge influx of migrants. The EU politicians, somehow and I really cannot understand how, misjudged the numbers of migrants that would attempt to come. It seemed obvious to the man in the street.[/quo
We're all kind to people at one time or another but the reality of it is, you can only help as much as you have.
Overextended help to these migrants need Z very serious scrutiny because resources get depleted. Like Capri said, budgets for some other expense are now funneled to this unprecedented situation.
What about the long term solution. Why's Germany not offerings great incentives to young people and give extra rewards and bonus to up or raise fertility among them?
As we speak, Germany holds one of the highest record of fertility or birth rate.
That's not how the world look at it Chris. Merkel on the Sunday issue of WSJ iz taking a selfie with the refugees. Smiling very confidently and showing the impression that she's done a gesture of kindness.
online today!lindsyjones Forum Posts (8,532)
Love found me here