Personally, my idea of a good and healthy relationship is to be able to sit down and share all the benefits and costs of what endeavor or activity we should take.
Now when it comes to knowing how controlling a person is? 24 months to me is way too long.\
Anyways I am glad I left the relationship because later on he wasn't being with anybody that lasted longer than that.
While I went on to being married for 30 years with a man that is so giving and full of compassion. Although that marriage seemed to have withstood all weathers in a relationship, I failed when we lost all our houses and assets in the economic crash...
But having said that I have no regrets whatsoever as to what happened in my life.
Of course, CC. I wouldn't want it either, but it seems there are so many relationship out there where one is enjoying to be controlled by the other one.
Of course, CC. I wouldn't want it either, but it seems there are so many relationship out there where one is enjoying to be controlled by the other one.
I think I can definitely qoute one of the reasons why Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise had to go separate ways was because of his controlling mechanics on their marriage..That kind of thing.
More of the direction and or decision making of any plans or events, or simple as where to go eat or what car to buy...etc..
Doesn't matter what really, the point is that there is so much weight put on by the one in control regardless of the feelings and or reasons of the other person.
More like control in the decision making of any activities that takes place in the relationship.
I have had a relationship long time ago where no matter how I felt or thought of the situation, it all goes down to the fact that he (ex) would have to approve of it.
Now having watch the direction of his dwindling finances then he is motivated just like anyone to run for enriching himself?? I would be so leary of his moves is that is the case.
Opening ourselves to knowledge and knowing the truth is powerful. Doesn't mean abandonment of respect and love, but getting away from dogma that cripples humanity. Yes it's liberating to stand for what is right.
Reputation is one big issue for the elite of course. Judging from his capabilities he can definitely skin you off. Accused Obama's birth and had it been his way, he'd have him deported. While his business practice of hiring illegals is supposed to be acceptable? What hypocrite.
Ignorance is not an option as I would have imagined. Absence of teaching is not my point, rather after intellectualizing our beliefs and know what is good, then we must not associate ourselves to the harmful effect of religious actions against one another. We can believe in God, we can foster unity, but do we have to fight one another because of differences in what we believe in?
At one time of another Lollette religion does enforce killing for the sake of promoting the strength of religion. Catholic killed a lot during the era of Constantinople and then when they did the crusade. Recently alone, the Serbians were slaughtered for religion. The Islam today is very powerful in their conviction for caliphating the world.
Hinduism and Buddhism, while they foster peace and love, at one point killing is a part of preservation. And almost all wars in the world start with religion including the First WW by the killing of Archduke Ferdinand.
Now I meant abandonment for affiliation doesn't mean taking off our inherent belief in God whom is revered but perhaps I would recommend, should the absence of religion direct our unity as one to become more engage in peace and tolerance, is what I meant. I am not going to church anymore doesn't mean I don't believe in God and promote love and unity. I just don't see some hypocrisy practice being useful in the unity of mankind.
Anybody that sustains corruption on any established law John is not good in my books. I'm sure he's done quite a lot that can smear his name, but when we think of politics, public accountability matters more than just business in economic control. Military power controls the world of which everything depends on including but not limited on socio-political political services.
Anybody that sustains corruption on any established law John is not good in my books. I'm sure he's done quite a lot that can smear his name, but when we think of politics, public accountability matters more than just business in economic control. Military power controls the world of which everything depends on including but not limited on socio-political political services.
I'm not igniting conflict amongst all the other religions, simply aspire to eliminate the causes that give rise to universal alienation.
I Patronize Ayn Rand ' s model of a structure of a working rationale built society. It edifices the very logic of working together to be a productive society. Where usefulness of every effort we exert is a built in element to the good of our socio-political environment. No doling out, no wrlfaridm. You survive because you work.
The liberals are the very enemies of our social virtues if you ask me. I'm taxed at 33 percent for what, so the beggars and users can exploit the reserves, the working and productive members built. Where's fairness and just in that?
Let's see, first let's simplify my core of discussion.
Religion is a built-in frame in a society. It weaves people's belief, values and traditions. It is defined as the mechanics that bind people together. However the very core which guards that unity is the very ingredient that makes other religion incompatible with the others.
History has enough records to show the very elements exhibited in a conflict among various organized religion rule out to be the very core of conflict. We have witnessed them, otherwise, why is islam, catholic, Buddhism can't just hold unto each other as one society united instead of being divided?
In the interest of one whole humanity, can't we structure a true one society that represents one humanity?
Beyond dispute, the facts couldn't be closer to reality. Love is a manifest of religion just as much as hatred. How can we pull it to love and peace sans cruelty and harm?
Meaning he is touting for power and show off more of his heavy pocket? Then would that mean he is a sound candidate for political leadership? His interest to tout more for gold to his coffer defeats most presidential ambitions for the lack of it?
lindsyjones Forum Posts (8,532)
control
Personally, my idea of a good and healthy relationship is to be able to sit down and share all the benefits and costs of what endeavor or activity we should take.Now when it comes to knowing how controlling a person is? 24 months to me is way too long.\
Anyways I am glad I left the relationship because later on he wasn't being with anybody that lasted longer than that.
While I went on to being married for 30 years with a man that is so giving and full of compassion. Although that marriage seemed to have withstood all weathers in a relationship, I failed when we lost all our houses and assets in the economic crash...
But having said that I have no regrets whatsoever as to what happened in my life.
That is all.