I am not a person that is callous and lacking compassion. I work for free at the Human Rights through United Nations. I haven't retired yet and I want to devout my time to the needs of the world vis a vis humanitarian causes. But I can't condone the fact that the illegal wave of immigration is my direction. I do have a -proposal for the needs of people to migrate. Increase the number of staff and manpower that process this and it is the prime responsibility of the country being invaded to put up a strict law on the processing of these criminals. Support the border. Now how can you sit and say that they are not criminals when they are? They are not killers or murderers, I have no issues on those. Nor do I have to find a way to make them look like angels either, but when it comes to the fundamentals of an international law or local, like Felixis said or any legal law, they are CRIMINALS.
Lollette, they are criminals. They violate the law. I have no question about legal immigration but to not treat them as criminals, is not right. They are captured and they go to jail, why? Because they violated a very important law. ILLEGALS. Why don't you label them as they have committed a crime?
This is a very serious problem that needs to be addressed and unless they are treated as such, then why bother having a border. Open it and don't set up the bigotry of not treating them like criminals. They might be good people but this is not the issue.
Absolutley Felixis. Criminals and they are not assets as much as they are liabilities and whoever think any different is an idiot and ignorant.
Law is a law is a law. Violate it and the domino of expenses incurred in correcting it is astronomical.
Obs those points while very inviting as a social excuse, in total picture the country invaded by illegals suffer tremendously at the expense of the taxpayers. Period.
I do agree on your points and I have not one moment discounted the facts that there are so many blunders the current as well as the past administration on monetary handling in the local economic functions. Heck I lost a lot of money on the collapse of Fannie May and Freddie Mac. Housing bubble that was deregulated caused all the banks to fatten up their bellies at the expense of the local consumers.
The fact remains the FR are run by the same people that controls the world's economy. I do feel China will never step up to that expectations. Reasons why the Rosenthals, Magnin and others are not too worried about whether the IMF is equated on any currency.
I( am not an economist but even common sense dictates, the US if not careful will definitely make its people under poverty much the same way as the rest of the world. However, don't underestimate the control geared towards turning the table if deemed necessary.
In short we can speculate all we want on the downfall of US economy versus China and other countries, but whoever control the military prowess rules the world.
Is it a coincidence that I have titled this as a failure on the part of the leader because of the direction of the world money movement? I have predicted this as the Chinese had been making the world their market when it comes to merchandise and have 60 percent control of the funds on the IMF. We, the US as one of the biggest debtor. Of course, it is evident that our economy is declining in spite of the fact that our military is supreme.
This makes me think that there is a boiling of WW# just to strategize the loan that is wrapped on the neck of the debtors..This is the only way where in the write off for this obligation is done.
So this will respond to the belief of yeats that indeed his reign is one of the worst disaster in political maneuvering.
In relation to the fact that all the policies incurred, rejected and or approved by his administration measure his failure and or success as a leader. AS far as I can see and read and think, he is a total failure. Period.
From a stand point of over population, the profitability of a country isn't based on what number generated per square miles. It is always on the strength based on the productivity of the people. In which case you have already read on the increase of welfare recipients and how it grew during his term.
You don't make quite a point on the investment side of the Pipeline. It is more of cutting cost from having all the refineries directly done in a territory that cut costs. It is already a profit just by approving it.
In terms of public policy and government deficits, an important figure is the aggregate annual deficit for all unlawful immigrant households. This equals the total benefits and services received by all unlawful immigrant households minus the total taxes paid by those households. Under current law, all unlawful immigrant households together have an aggregate annual deficit of around $54.5 billion. In the interim phase (roughly the first 13 years after amnesty), the aggregate annual deficit would fall to $43.4 billion. At the end of the interim phase, former unlawful immigrant households would become fully eligible for means-tested welfare and health care benefits under the Affordable Care Act. The aggregate annual deficit would soar to around $106 billion
This is a fraction on the Immigration Reports by Redwine.
You can easily access all the legal documents to prove it.
Don't act like you are ignorant. Even in a common sense term, you should know how a country suffers from the influx of ILLEGAL immigrants.
You've got to be joking. Do you know that before the statistics were out on expenses incurred from medical alone, all these illegals are provided for medical benefits? Now you talk like lawyer, you must be a corrupt one, if, you don't see the disadvantages of a country accepting illegals.
String, I have seriously questioned our mentality why on earth we have put in a man sans experience in integrity and success related to our goals as a nation...Maybe because we were so tired of the Bush rule that anyone who would have been a contender, would have won. Romney, looking back would have been a better choice. Having said that, he has worsened all the foreign policies specially in the force of terrorism.
His declaration that he is muslim is not a personal label, it is just that of course his objectives and goals are that of the preservation of what is good to that group. I have been so surprised on that claim but that would explain all the principal objectives of his policies.
Obama has also been the food stamp President, with the number on food stamps increasing during his Administration to an all-time record high of 47.7 million, up 80% over the past 5 years. Contrast that with the Clinton-Gingrich 1996 reform of the old, New Deal, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. Under those reforms, the number dependent on the old AFDC program declined by two-thirds. Their incomes from going to work instead were documented to increase by 25%, while saving taxpayers 50% of the cost of old AFDC, compared to prior trends. But today’s “progressive,” Obama/Che Guevara Democrats are not the Kennedy/Clinton Democrats of yore.
String, well done. Yes, we are corrupted by our ignorance on voting for someone that we have never known. No history whatsoever as to what good he has done for this country.
I get it that we are at fault for having put a man that has no integrity based on records of achievement.
lol string, how pathetic, when Carter is injured by being compared to him. He's such an impostor.
He is measured up to the current expectation Manny. By the time we reach the future it will not mean anything..It will just be words much like during the term of Carter.
He is measured up to the current expectation Manny. By the time we reach the future it will not mean anything..It will just be words much like during the term of Carter.
How can you claim for a country to be selfish by producing and living off on their own? The problem is the deregulation of corporate offices to outsource all the jobs away from its original country just to beef up their coffers? America is not selfish in anyway shape or form by creating and building a formidable economic legacy. Nor can it be said to any country including yours.
China today can be claimed being selfish? Just because it produces all the goods to be consumed by the world? Check this out, go to Woolworths, and even at Cole's and check their goods. Can good, like fish are imported from China for you to be consumed, how pathetic is that? At least in my country, we don't have that product. We are limited to dry goods and not consumables other than the specific stores that caters to different cultures.
And it is our responsibility as citizens to work in order to sustain marketability of our talents and bring back profit generations for our country. A most abandoned policy of Obama.
Obs the flattering doesn't work for me. . I'm old as your grand mother. . Mind wise you stimulates even the most banal in their trait. I'm truly inspired swimming in your unflattering arrogance yet direct and discriminating taste.
Obs the flattering doesn't work for me. . I'm old as your grand mother. . Mind wise you stimulates even the most banal in their trait. I'm truly inspired swimming in your unflattering arrogance yet direct and discriminating taste.
Obs the flattering doesn't work for me. . I'm old as your grand mother. . Mind wise you stimulates even the most banal in their trait. I'm truly inspired swimming in your unflattering arrogance yet direct and discriminating taste.
Obs the flattering doesn't work for me. . I'm old as your grand mother. . Mind wise you stimulates even the most banal in their trait. I'm truly inspired swimming in your unflattering arrogance yet direct and discriminating taste.
If it gets any worst, the battle for economic supremacy soon will be limited to China, Germany, and some other countries that are stable in their objectives for progress..
Those skyrocketing electricity prices are another loss for the poor too. Under the ultraliberal Barack Obama, and his “progressive” Democrats, poverty has soared while he has been President to nearly 50 million Americans, more than at any other time in the more than 50 years that the Census Bureau has been tracking poverty. The poverty rate has also jumped by over 30% to 16.1%, about the same as when the War on Poverty started $5 trillion and almost 50 years ago. We need “progressive” liberal Democrats for this?
Fast forward after the colonial time and the most progressive countries and or nation in the world is no less than AMERICA, the new world, Australia, Canada. Combine these three powers and you got the crown over your head. An achievement not too many of the original colonizers can take credit for.
Those are easy to spot as a negative element not worth sustaining in any relationship. Too many of these traits into a person would not only be a failure but a disaster that leads to hopelessness.
Just like what was quoted by the author: When you have an objective and your standard as a person becomes the guiding line, you fail tremendously as individual if you don't get to achieve such an objective. That is no biggie, but when you lead a very progressive nation like America and the world is watching your every move, you fail the future of humanity when you can't even go back and connect yourself with your original goal. The world is changing against you and you are so pathetic to not being able to do anything. Sure you can't do it alone, but that is why as a President, you have the choice to pick who can support and rally behind you in order to carry on the hopes you gave your people or you are just a liar. He is a good liar.
Worse he is not approving profitable venture that will boost our economy like the keystone pipeline. Many inconsistencies in addressing the real issues as well as ineffective objective on the Middle East war. Imagine the ISIS growing like a cancer in the world.
Sure there are so many in the upper echelon of political system that are his puppets already so it looks like he is standing tall and heroic on all his policies but I know I made a big mistake in voting for him.
Peter Ferrara of Forbes Magazine published this in 2013 and 24 months later, I don't see any change for progress for America and or the world.
Although I have to admit price on fuel is low.
Any opinions?
Barack Obama's Presidency Is A Complete Failure By His Own, Self-Imposed Standards
Trans Canada Keystone Oil Pipeline Trans Canada Keystone Oil Pipeline (Photo credit: shannonpatrick17)
At the end of 2013, after serving five years, Barack Obama is a complete failure as President, by his own standards, as reflected in his own words.
How many times has President Obama told us that he is “fighting for the middle class”? But real median family income has been in a continuous downward spiral since he became President, actually falling more since the recession ended in the summer of 2009 according to the National Bureau of Economic Research than during the recession. That has added up by now to the middle class losing a month’s pay a year under President Obama’s economic policies.
If President Obama is “fighting for the middle class,” why doesn’t he approve the Keystone Pipeline? Building and maintaining the pipeline would provide thousands of good paying jobs. So would refining and selling the oil and gas from the Gulf Coast refineries where the pipeline would deliver the Canadian crude. Moreover, that plentiful supply of low cost energy from a long time, reliable ally would support hundreds of thousands if not millions of additional good paying jobs in the American economy.
Note: His policies on the Mid East war sucks, Immigration, ridiculous and the economy very weak.
Obs, boy I'd hate to be with you in any activity. While it's the most effective way of reaching to perfection, it's a very difficult way to handle things.
I can imagine you as always being negative Obs. A perfectionist and unforgiving to a a flaw. ..
lindsyjones Forum Posts (8,532)
RE: We are under invasion
I am not a person that is callous and lacking compassion. I work for free at the Human Rights through United Nations. I haven't retired yet and I want to devout my time to the needs of the world vis a vis humanitarian causes. But I can't condone the fact that the illegal wave of immigration is my direction. I do have a -proposal for the needs of people to migrate. Increase the number of staff and manpower that process this and it is the prime responsibility of the country being invaded to put up a strict law on the processing of these criminals. Support the border. Now how can you sit and say that they are not criminals when they are? They are not killers or murderers, I have no issues on those. Nor do I have to find a way to make them look like angels either, but when it comes to the fundamentals of an international law or local, like Felixis said or any legal law, they are CRIMINALS.