Blogs Argument's

I have had several employers who as a condition of hiring require all of your email addresses and website user names (sometimes backed up by a polygraph to ensure you didn't forget any) and access to your social sites, then they look at everything you ever wrote to see if hiring you could lead to their being embarrassed at a future date if someone else found the old post/thread. If all is cool you get hired like I did, but if not, you get an email saying thank you for applying, but we hired someone else, good luck to you.

Well, there are more writers of blogs right now than there are readers, so that's clearly a vanity phenomenon.

So are you vain?

@ Ken, could'nt that enfringe on ones privacy rigts or something similar?

Agree with the OP... one shouldn't post more than one is prepared to discuss with another in real life... sniff...sniff....

Thanks, this picture just brought me a message from a 17 year old Dude ...

Yeah well, I admit sometimes I'm vain. Anything wrong with that? Sometimes people are judgmental, anything wrong with that too?

I'm pretty sure all of my blogs will some day be listed under some heading pertaining to cures for insomnia so I'm not too worried about what I post here or anywhere.

zeus you look like an older 10 k, any relation?

Malta is so small they are all cousins

@ lukeon - some have raised that and some (a minority) of State legislators agree. However the majority of the authorities seem to be taking the position it is consensual since you have no inherent right to work for any specific employer and if you choose to willingly apply for the job, then sign a consent to be investigated, then willingly provide the needed information, well, that was your right to provide it if you so chose as a condition leading up to the employment. You always had/have the right to just say no, and go someplace else.

steff
yes it could be him, come on 10 k say hey