Hugz_n_Kissez: Nooooo you should be able to back up what you post...and post correct info...NOT tabloid info... Einstein..and yes a circular argument is an out..because it puts the on back on the person to answer something that you haven't answered yourself..OR can't answer....that's debate ethics 101...
Ohhhhh and also in a debate..each person backs up their own arguments with their own points...NOT the other way around...Seeeeee I do know something...that's called ethical debating....and using things like circular arguments are outside of ethical debating....
blue_eyed_blonde: "The statistics spell out the dilemma. The number of Americans on food stamps topped 31.5 million in September, a record high. Obesity, too, is at epidemic levels: In 30 states, at least 25 percent of the population is dangerously overweight. Nationally, 31.9 percent of children are considered overweight or obese.
For decades, the government has treated hunger and obesity as unrelated phenomena. But at a recent news conference in Chicago, Tom Vilsack, President-elect Barack Obama's choice for agriculture secretary, said that he would put "nutrition at the center of all food assistance programs," a signal that he will get involved next year when Congress moves to reauthorize nutrition programs that support school breakfasts and lunches and summer food for children."this among many articles I have read and none lay claim to reducing food stamps for obese women. Moreso, they talk of obesity in regards to the general public, not discrimmating against only women. And in even more articles it talks of farmers markets to increase a healthy choice of food for lower income families...(not just women), also they go into more detail about healthier food in the school food programs...anyways, this is getting to be quite boring as you cant come up with direct and valid proof of your "sources"
Your information is inaccurate and just plain false. But say whatever it takes to justify it in your head..
So how long did it take you to figure out that it was a ploy to get all you libs wound up over something inconsequential by incorporating a few facts, out of context of course, and adding a little BS.
toranoga: So how long did it take you to figure out that it was a ploy to get all you libs wound up over something inconsequential by incorporating a few facts, out of context of course, and adding a little BS.
Im not sure it took me that long, I was arguing with you last night...im more amazed you drug this out so long and came across as "one who isnt blessed with a great deal of brainage".
blue_eyed_blonde: Im not sure it took me that long, I was arguing with you last night...im more amazed you drug this out so long and came across as "one who isnt blessed with a great deal of brainage".
blue_eyed_blonde: ahmmm ahmm duh ahmmm...maybe you could narrow down what speech... ok...just so there isnt another mix up...if you can read this..can you give the name or the date of this speech? and not say..i gave you the link..yada yada yada..man your funny!
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).