threads~does the Op own a thread?? do they have the right to direct people around in it?? (76)
Don't think i would call it ownership, more like chairing a meeting, if that makes sense.As for your second question, here I think that is often seen as trying to inflame the situation again, and they generally get locked or removed because they end up a fight. jmo
------ This thread is Archived ------
Well.. if you are having a conversation with a bunch of people at a dinner party, do you own that?
Can you dictate what can or cannot be said whilst debating your thoughts about the soup of the day?
And what about talking about a friend of a friend of a ect.
If they aren't there.
Whether or not it's proper, doesn't matter at all. It's still done.
Think Einsteins theories.
He's gone, can't defend himself.
So I suppose we shouldn't try and figure out of he was right or wrong huh?
There's no morality about it. Not really.
Carrying on a topic of discussion that a person who isn't around anymore cannot be controlled either.
Can you dictate what can or cannot be said whilst debating your thoughts about the soup of the day?
And what about talking about a friend of a friend of a ect.
If they aren't there.
Whether or not it's proper, doesn't matter at all. It's still done.
Think Einsteins theories.
He's gone, can't defend himself.
So I suppose we shouldn't try and figure out of he was right or wrong huh?
There's no morality about it. Not really.
Carrying on a topic of discussion that a person who isn't around anymore cannot be controlled either.
------ This thread is Archived ------
morgan5: Don't think i would call it ownership, more like chairing a meeting, if that makes sense.
As for your second question, here I think that is often seen as trying to inflame the situation again, and they generally get locked or removed because they end up a fight. jmo
As for your second question, here I think that is often seen as trying to inflame the situation again, and they generally get locked or removed because they end up a fight. jmo
yes true that about the second question....other people buy in (yes i'm guilty of that) to take sides, and it starts allover again, just between a new set of people fighting over who said what
------ This thread is Archived ------
oops, short answer
No
and
No.
No
and
No.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Raven0: oops, short answer
No
and
No.
No
and
No.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Raven0: Well.. if you are having a conversation with a bunch of people at a dinner party, do you own that?
Can you dictate what can or cannot be said whilst debating your thoughts about the soup of the day?
And what about talking about a friend of a friend of a ect.
If they aren't there.
Whether or not it's proper, doesn't matter at all. It's still done.
Think Einsteins theories.
He's gone, can't defend himself.
So I suppose we shouldn't try and figure out of he was right or wrong huh?
There's no morality about it. Not really.
Carrying on a topic of discussion that a person who isn't around anymore cannot be controlled either.
and people referr this to something other than "Real Life".....Can you dictate what can or cannot be said whilst debating your thoughts about the soup of the day?
And what about talking about a friend of a friend of a ect.
If they aren't there.
Whether or not it's proper, doesn't matter at all. It's still done.
Think Einsteins theories.
He's gone, can't defend himself.
So I suppose we shouldn't try and figure out of he was right or wrong huh?
There's no morality about it. Not really.
Carrying on a topic of discussion that a person who isn't around anymore cannot be controlled either.
------ This thread is Archived ------
velvetUG: yes true that about the second question....other people buy in (yes i'm guilty of that) to take sides, and it starts allover again, just between a new set of people fighting over who said what
Its a jungle out there baby.
------ This thread is Archived ------
jessejess47: and people referr this to something other than "Real Life".....
real what now?
What's that?
------ This thread is Archived ------
velvetUG: yes true that about the second question....other people buy in (yes i'm guilty of that) to take sides, and it starts allover again, just between a new set of people fighting over who said what
Think we all do it, human nature ------ This thread is Archived ------
velvetUG: are you tarzan?? me jane..........sweet mary jane
Im a joker, Im a smoker , Im a midnighttoker...playin my music in the suuuhuhuhuhun
------ This thread is Archived ------
velvetUG: is it ok to direct people how to behave or what to say just because your the OP?
ALSO, if a member posts a thread to try and make sense of a bewildering situation of a disagreement, is that crossing the moral line?? especially if the member no longer has a profile here? so long as there is no naming that person, insults or offensive remarks about the other member is it ok with you to do that?THANKS IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR REPLIES
ALSO, if a member posts a thread to try and make sense of a bewildering situation of a disagreement, is that crossing the moral line?? especially if the member no longer has a profile here? so long as there is no naming that person, insults or offensive remarks about the other member is it ok with you to do that?THANKS IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR REPLIES
What is the question here???
------ This thread is Archived ------
Boban1: What is the question here???
does the OP have the right to tell people what to say in their thread??
and also if a member posts a thread because of a dispute with another member, is that ok, even if insults arent thrown or the opposing member named??
------ This thread is Archived ------
velvetUG: does the OP have the right to tell people what to say in their thread??
and also if a member posts a thread because of a dispute with another member, is that ok, even if insults arent thrown or the opposing member named??
Don't think you can tell them what to say, but ok to try and diffuse a situation. and also if a member posts a thread because of a dispute with another member, is that ok, even if insults arent thrown or the opposing member named??
------ This thread is Archived ------
velvetUG: does the OP have the right to tell people what to say in their thread??
and also if a member posts a thread because of a dispute with another member, is that ok, even if insults arent thrown or the opposing member named??
and also if a member posts a thread because of a dispute with another member, is that ok, even if insults arent thrown or the opposing member named??
No one own`s anything around here
and Yes its ok
(how you insult some one tels me more about you then the other person )
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
What's going on
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
Salami, Salami, Baloney
What I Lack In Vocabulary
Nature
everything is changing
How far is too far?
Heavy Bass In The PM
Icebergs Still Around
1830's Music
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
1,491 Views
75 Comments
in Chat Threads
Created: Aug 2009
Last Viewed: 5 hrs ago
Last Commented: Aug 2009
0 Likes
ALSO, if a member posts a thread to try and make sense of a bewildering situation of a disagreement, is that crossing the moral line?? especially if the member no longer has a profile here? so long as there is no naming that person, insults or offensive remarks about the other member is it ok with you to do that?
THANKS IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR REPLIES