Gun Control Advocate Shoots Intruder (12)
Define "many others". Who are "they"? A small unnoticed newsite read primarily by gun nuts and survivalists?
And no, I do not have a problem with weapons ownership with the exception of assault and automatic weaponry.
And no, I do not have a problem with weapons ownership with the exception of assault and automatic weaponry.
------ This thread is Archived ------
cosmik_debris: Define "many others". Who are "they"? A small unnoticed newsite read primarily by gun nuts and survivalists?
And no, I do not have a problem with weapons ownership with the exception of assault and automatic weaponry.
And no, I do not have a problem with weapons ownership with the exception of assault and automatic weaponry.
You are aware that Assault weapons ARE automatic weapons right?
because true assault rifles can fire in full auto (Or Automatic)mode.
I'm a staunch supporter of Semi-Automatic weapons in civilian hands.
no matter the caliber or capacity,I also don't think it's up to me to tell others what should be legal as far as inanimate objects are concerned,however I feel it should be stated that full auto's would cost the owner piles of money (Increased wear on parts,not to mention the cost of ammo alone would run through a small fortune these days).
------ This thread is Archived ------
almera03: before you carry on with your soapbox speech , perhaps you could answer the question that the first poster set you
Because I didn't write it I posted some of the article that was taken from the link.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Maybe you should do a little reading before you post.
It might help improve your understanding of the subject at hand.
It might help improve your understanding of the subject at hand.
------ This thread is Archived ------
almera03: before you carry on with your soapbox speech , perhaps you could answer the question that the first poster set you
In response to: Define "many others". Who are "they"? A small unnoticed newsite read primarily by gun nuts and survivalists?
And no, I do not have a problem with weapons ownership with the exception of assault and automatic weaponry.
And no, I do not have a problem with weapons ownership with the exception of assault and automatic weaponry.
If the two of you had read the story the link leads to, you would have noticed that the OP had copied and pasted part of the story which contained the question. He was not asking a question.
Earl
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ridge138: Because I didn't write it I posted some of the article that was taken from the link.
So your whole point of this thread was to ridicule someone and to enlighten us about your knowledge of weapons------ This thread is Archived ------
Ridge138: Maybe you should do a little reading before you post.
It might help improve your understanding of the subject at hand.
It might help improve your understanding of the subject at hand.
Well I just read the link. It doesn't take a genius to work out that the author is anti gun control.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Gun control is being able to hit what your aiming at
Earl
Earl
------ This thread is Archived ------
I was anti-gun until I learned to shoot and safely handle firearms. I'm a gun owner now.
I worry more about the danger of someone talking or texting on a cell phone while driving more than I do about a responsible gun owner.
I worry more about the danger of someone talking or texting on a cell phone while driving more than I do about a responsible gun owner.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Kattsrose: I was anti-gun until I learned to shoot and safely handle firearms. I'm a gun owner now.
I worry more about the danger of someone talking or texting on a cell phone while driving more than I do about a responsible gun owner.
I worry more about the danger of someone talking or texting on a cell phone while driving more than I do about a responsible gun owner.
They are a danger to all who drive.------ This thread is Archived ------
Liberals claim they wan to ban assault guns but the fact of the matter is that they want semi autos banned along with full automatic weapons. semi autos are not assault guns they are used primarily for hunting and target shooting what not. The liberals want so bad to label all self loading guns as tools of the devil.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
rarotonga
Sleepy Don!
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
Feel Good Music
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
your personality
How far is too far?
The Best of the GOP
other can see but not you
Common Issues with the BMW X1
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
859 Views
11 Comments
Created: Jan 2010
Last Viewed: May 3
Last Commented: Feb 2010
0 Likes
What would you think if a long-time gun control advocate ended up shooting someone? Might the word “hypocrite” come to mind?
It did for me, and apparently for many others.
The Richmond Times-Dispatch reports North Carolina state senator R.C. Soles shot one of two intruders who attempted to break into his house.
But it gets even more interesting than the mere hypocrisy of a gun control activist shooting somebody.