Do people in their 60's still get the urge? (104)
haunebu2: Wow - An expensive Ghost with a PhD to boot
Thank you for the intellectual enlightenment -
Thank you for the intellectual enlightenment -
Insert laughing smilies...that's mockery and instigated the to and fro between you and jonnt.
haunebu2: Two things. You make a fair point. It is none of my business, however I was curious to know. And you didn't answer my question, nor were you obliged to. But you had no right to come on here instigating mockery with other members.
what was instigating mockery by asking the initial question about your abbreviation which was ambiguous?
Regardless, I won't have you coming on here not answering my questions and instigating mockery.1.Who the hell do you think YOU are? At least have the guts to specify which of my comments instigated it so I can issue an aoplogy IF needed
what was instigating mockery by asking the initial question about your abbreviation which was ambiguous?
Regardless, I won't have you coming on here not answering my questions and instigating mockery.1.Who the hell do you think YOU are? At least have the guts to specify which of my comments instigated it so I can issue an aoplogy IF needed
Also, don't use that aggressive tone with me.
Peacocke: Your initial question wasn't initiating mockery. I answered your question to which you then started to mock me
Read again the to and fro between you and jonnt on the first page. Yes you were mocking me therafter.
Read again the to and fro between you and jonnt on the first page. Yes you were mocking me therafter.
There is a C.S ruling that says were not allowed to have any type of banter between ourselves to others ,{rule 4001c)
But that ruling is void on Thursdays .
Please read it
jonnt: There is a C.S ruling that says were not allowed to have any type of banter between ourselves to others ,{rule 4001c)
But that ruling is void on Thursdays .
Please read it
But that ruling is void on Thursdays .
Please read it
I think we have a case of the staff pinching the patients medication here ,,
Sorry cant banter with you any more ,,,times up
Sorry cant banter with you any more ,,,times up
jonnt: There is a C.S ruling that says were not allowed to have any type of banter between ourselves to others ,{rule 4001c)
But that ruling is void on Thursdays .
Please read it
But that ruling is void on Thursdays .
Please read it
You should change that to There is a C.S ruling that says we're not allowed to have any type of banter between ourselves ABOUT others.
Peacocke: Insert laughing smilies...that's mockery and instigated the to and fro between you and jonnt.
Oi Veh ! - Seit wann war das Einfügen emos verboten?
haunebu2: Oi Veh ! - Seit wann war das Einfügen emos verboten?
In English?
jonnt: I think we have a case of the staff pinching the patients medication here ,, Sorry cant banter with you any more ,,,times up
Careful Scouse - The prof could be Dr Herta Oberheuser re-incarnated
Peacocke: In English?
Oi Veh = Commonly known yiddish expression for Dear me, and the other bit
Since when was the use of Emo's forbidden ?
Simples
haunebu2: Up yours too - scarse git
risibilis: this such a funny (ha ha) forum. The OP is so full of anger and digging deeper and deeper into a hole of self-embarrassment ...
let go and laugh at yourself ......
let go and laugh at yourself ......
Yeah you're right in a way. But still...my question ain't been answered by most.
Peacocke: Yeah you're right in a way. But still...my question ain't been answered by most.
Peacocke,,was is it you want to know ?
Please please tell us ..
Peacocke: Yeah you're right in a way. But still...my question ain't been answered by most.
I think it's only fair that you tell us how often your mum likes it. And your dad and your aunties and uncles.
It would set the scene for open discussion. And to be fair I did inform you of Charley Chaplin and my friend's problems with her randy septuagenarian dad.
ChasingCars: I think it's only fair that you tell us how often your mum likes it. And your dad and your aunties and uncles.
It would set the scene for open discussion. And to be fair I did inform you of Charley Chaplin and my friend's problems with her randy septuagenarian dad.
It would set the scene for open discussion. And to be fair I did inform you of Charley Chaplin and my friend's problems with her randy septuagenarian dad.
Maybe Pea Cook just wants a dirty chat but is to
to come straight out with it ,,I think everyone ive seen in this forum are to well mannered to do that scenario ,,
Maybe she"s a little frustrated it hasnt turned out that way
ChasingCars: I think it's only fair that you tell us how often your mum likes it. And your dad and your aunties and uncles.
It would set the scene for open discussion. And to be fair I did inform you of Charley Chaplin and my friend's problems with her randy septuagenarian dad.
It would set the scene for open discussion. And to be fair I did inform you of Charley Chaplin and my friend's problems with her randy septuagenarian dad.
I'm not sure how that amounts to fair, and why would I divulge in offering that sort of info. To what end?
More Threads
s*xual skills
Kultur-multur
the way you look
Ladies
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
wanting beyond need
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
The weird and the random facts around the world
Democrats destroyed America
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
what was instigating mockery by asking the initial question about your abbreviation which was ambiguous?
Regardless, I won't have you coming on here not answering my questions and instigating mockery.1.Who the hell do you think YOU are? At least have the guts to specify which of my comments instigated it so I can issue an aoplogy IF needed
Your initial question wasn't initiating mockery. I answered your question to which you then started to mock me
Read again the to and fro between you and jonnt on the first page. Yes you were mocking me therafter.