a royal princess is born (28)
minnieme2: Hopefully not but I think she'll be ok. William and Kate aren't like Charles and Diana. They're more solid.
Wonder what they'll call her?
Wonder what they'll call her?
I think Diane is a nice name after the Queen of Hearts.
------ This thread is Archived ------
chris27292729: Do they use "blue blood" in transfusion???
if you want some I think Fergi is your best bet. She will do anything and really cheap.
------ This thread is Archived ------
2girlsnocup: Don't worry. The royals are not shy of cheating, so you'll get your chance with William
Are you suggesting a fivesome?..
------ This thread is Archived ------
Fortyeightsixsix: Hi everyone a royalist that I am and I wish to share my joy in the birth of the latest little member of the royal family
How Birth Order Will Shape the New Royal Princess
By Jeffrey Kluger (Editor for TIME).
It's never easy being a second-born
especially when your big brother is going to be king
Dear Royal Princess:
(Whatever name the CS society gives to you)
...George is your big brother. He’s only 20 months old and the world finds him adorable, but you won’t—for a lot of reasons. …..
The main problem with George is not that he’s third in line to the throne and you’re fourth. That just happens to be one of the downsides of your family business. The problem is one that’s familiar to the rest of us serfs and colonists:
he’s the first born, and you’re not.
Your mom and your dad—lovely people, by all accounts—are no different from other parents when it comes to baby-making; they’re ruled by their genes and genes are greedy. The only thing they want is to be reproduced over and over and over again. That makes moms and dads want to have lots of babies, which is good, but they don’t treat all those babies exactly the same.
The first-born—Georgie in your case—gets a head start on food, attention, medical care, education and more. Before the second-born—you, in your case—even comes along, that makes the big sibling a better bet to survive childhood, grow up and have babies of his own,...
In your family, of course, there’s plenty of food, money and other resources to go around, but back in the days of one of your many royal grandpas—let’s say Edward III, who had the rotten luck to be in office in 1348 when the black plague was making its rounds—surviving childhood wasn’t such a sure thing.
So moms and dads, who have already invested a lot of resources in the first born, tend to favor that child, with later ones getting what’s left over. Corporations call this sunk costs (you’ll learn about this at Eton). In the case of the monarchy, it’s called “an heir and a spare”—but you didn’t hear that from me.
... Your job—and the job of any littler royals who may come along after you—will be to try to upset that order. It’s why later-borns tend to be more rebellious and to take more risks than first-borns. You’ll be likelier to play extreme sports than big bro George. ....
In the event you ever become Ruler of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of other Realms and Territories around the world—and a whole lot would have to go wrong in your family for that to happen, so don’t start getting measured for the cape yet—you’d be a more liberal, less conventional monarch than your big bro will be....
As you get older, other perils await—ones that are especially problematic for royal families. You don’t really know your grandpa Charles yet, but you’ll find he’s a pretty well-behaved guy (OK, there was the thing with grandmum Camilla, but that’s for him to explain to you). The same is true of your dad. How come? Because they’re both going to be king one day.
As for your Uncle Harry? Ask him about what he wears to Halloween parties (not good) or to play pool in Las Vegas hotel rooms (not much).....
That’s what comes from having lots of money, too much free time, and being really, really close to the throne but never getting to sit on it.
In fairness, it’s not just you royals who get up to mischief when a big sib is the star and you’re not. Something similar has happened here in the colonies. Ever heard of Donald Nixon or Billy Carter or Roger Clinton or Neil Bush? Probably not, but trust me, don’t be those guys.
None of this is for you to worry about yet. Even royal babies are just babies, so for now sleep in, fatten up and hang with mom as much as you can—especially if it keeps your dad away from her.
Trust me, the middle-child gig is even worse.
------ This thread is Archived ------
In response to: Hi everyone a royalist that I am and I wish to share my joy in the birth of the latest little member of the royal family
I think all of us have a place in this world. I am so happy for them. Its a beautiful young couples and very humble. I really like William he took from his mum humbleness. I liked DIANA. She must be happy today watching her grands from heaven. CONGRANTS may she have health we need women power to change this mens world.
God Bless the little princess.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lifeisadream: How Birth Order Will Shape the New Royal Princess
By Jeffrey Kluger (Editor for TIME).
It's never easy being a second-born
especially when your big brother is going to be kingDear Royal Princess:
(Whatever name the CS society gives to you)
...George is your big brother. He’s only 20 months old and the world finds him adorable, but you won’t—for a lot of reasons. …..
The main problem with George is not that he’s third in line to the throne and you’re fourth. That just happens to be one of the downsides of your family business. The problem is one that’s familiar to the rest of us serfs and colonists:
he’s the first born, and you’re not.
Your mom and your dad—lovely people, by all accounts—are no different from other parents when it comes to baby-making; they’re ruled by their genes and genes are greedy. The only thing they want is to be reproduced over and over and over again. That makes moms and dads want to have lots of babies, which is good, but they don’t treat all those babies exactly the same.
The first-born—Georgie in your case—gets a head start on food, attention, medical care, education and more. Before the second-born—you, in your case—even comes along, that makes the big sibling a better bet to survive childhood, grow up and have babies of his own,...
In your family, of course, there’s plenty of food, money and other resources to go around, but back in the days of one of your many royal grandpas—let’s say Edward III, who had the rotten luck to be in office in 1348 when the black plague was making its rounds—surviving childhood wasn’t such a sure thing.
So moms and dads, who have already invested a lot of resources in the first born, tend to favor that child, with later ones getting what’s left over. Corporations call this sunk costs (you’ll learn about this at Eton). In the case of the monarchy, it’s called “an heir and a spare”—but you didn’t hear that from me.
... Your job—and the job of any littler royals who may come along after you—will be to try to upset that order. It’s why later-borns tend to be more rebellious and to take more risks than first-borns. You’ll be likelier to play extreme sports than big bro George. ....
In the event you ever become Ruler of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of other Realms and Territories around the world—and a whole lot would have to go wrong in your family for that to happen, so don’t start getting measured for the cape yet—you’d be a more liberal, less conventional monarch than your big bro will be....
As you get older, other perils await—ones that are especially problematic for royal families. You don’t really know your grandpa Charles yet, but you’ll find he’s a pretty well-behaved guy (OK, there was the thing with grandmum Camilla, but that’s for him to explain to you). The same is true of your dad. How come? Because they’re both going to be king one day.
As for your Uncle Harry? Ask him about what he wears to Halloween parties (not good) or to play pool in Las Vegas hotel rooms (not much).....
That’s what comes from having lots of money, too much free time, and being really, really close to the throne but never getting to sit on it.
In fairness, it’s not just you royals who get up to mischief when a big sib is the star and you’re not. Something similar has happened here in the colonies. Ever heard of Donald Nixon or Billy Carter or Roger Clinton or Neil Bush? Probably not, but trust me, don’t be those guys.
None of this is for you to worry about yet. Even royal babies are just babies, so for now sleep in, fatten up and hang with mom as much as you can—especially if it keeps your dad away from her.
Trust me, the middle-child gig is even worse.
By Jeffrey Kluger (Editor for TIME).
It's never easy being a second-born
especially when your big brother is going to be kingDear Royal Princess:
(Whatever name the CS society gives to you)
...George is your big brother. He’s only 20 months old and the world finds him adorable, but you won’t—for a lot of reasons. …..
The main problem with George is not that he’s third in line to the throne and you’re fourth. That just happens to be one of the downsides of your family business. The problem is one that’s familiar to the rest of us serfs and colonists:
he’s the first born, and you’re not.
Your mom and your dad—lovely people, by all accounts—are no different from other parents when it comes to baby-making; they’re ruled by their genes and genes are greedy. The only thing they want is to be reproduced over and over and over again. That makes moms and dads want to have lots of babies, which is good, but they don’t treat all those babies exactly the same.
The first-born—Georgie in your case—gets a head start on food, attention, medical care, education and more. Before the second-born—you, in your case—even comes along, that makes the big sibling a better bet to survive childhood, grow up and have babies of his own,...
In your family, of course, there’s plenty of food, money and other resources to go around, but back in the days of one of your many royal grandpas—let’s say Edward III, who had the rotten luck to be in office in 1348 when the black plague was making its rounds—surviving childhood wasn’t such a sure thing.
So moms and dads, who have already invested a lot of resources in the first born, tend to favor that child, with later ones getting what’s left over. Corporations call this sunk costs (you’ll learn about this at Eton). In the case of the monarchy, it’s called “an heir and a spare”—but you didn’t hear that from me.
... Your job—and the job of any littler royals who may come along after you—will be to try to upset that order. It’s why later-borns tend to be more rebellious and to take more risks than first-borns. You’ll be likelier to play extreme sports than big bro George. ....
In the event you ever become Ruler of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of other Realms and Territories around the world—and a whole lot would have to go wrong in your family for that to happen, so don’t start getting measured for the cape yet—you’d be a more liberal, less conventional monarch than your big bro will be....
As you get older, other perils await—ones that are especially problematic for royal families. You don’t really know your grandpa Charles yet, but you’ll find he’s a pretty well-behaved guy (OK, there was the thing with grandmum Camilla, but that’s for him to explain to you). The same is true of your dad. How come? Because they’re both going to be king one day.
As for your Uncle Harry? Ask him about what he wears to Halloween parties (not good) or to play pool in Las Vegas hotel rooms (not much).....
That’s what comes from having lots of money, too much free time, and being really, really close to the throne but never getting to sit on it.
In fairness, it’s not just you royals who get up to mischief when a big sib is the star and you’re not. Something similar has happened here in the colonies. Ever heard of Donald Nixon or Billy Carter or Roger Clinton or Neil Bush? Probably not, but trust me, don’t be those guys.
None of this is for you to worry about yet. Even royal babies are just babies, so for now sleep in, fatten up and hang with mom as much as you can—especially if it keeps your dad away from her.
Trust me, the middle-child gig is even worse.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lifeisadream
that is brilliant.
i am seventh in y family and i understand my rebellious altitude.
thanks
that is brilliant.
i am seventh in y family and i understand my rebellious altitude.
thanks
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
your personality
Sleepy Don!
Common Issues with the BMW X1
Unions support Democrats!
men's perspective towards women
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
Feel Good Music
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
the way you look
wanting beyond need
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Hopefully not but I think she'll be ok. William and Kate aren't like Charles and Diana. They're more solid.
Wonder what they'll call her?