The case comes as the Trump administration has vowed to more strictly enforce immigration laws
(CNN)"The Supreme Court on Monday left in place a lower court opinion rejecting claims by undocumented Central American women and children -- who were apprehended immediately after arriving in the country without authorization -- seeking asylum.
Lawyers for the families sought to challenge their expedited removal proceedings in federal court arguing they face gender-based violence at home, but a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court held that they have no right to judicial review of such claims."
From CNN news today.
Looks like our elected President is on the dot of his promise on this problem.
lindsyjones: The case comes as the Trump administration has vowed to more strictly enforce immigration laws
(CNN)"The Supreme Court on Monday left in place a lower court opinion rejecting claims by undocumented Central American women and children -- who were apprehended immediately after arriving in the country without authorization -- seeking asylum.
Lawyers for the families sought to challenge their expedited removal proceedings in federal court arguing they face gender-based violence at home, but a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court held that they have no right to judicial review of such claims."
From CNN news today.
Looks like our elected President is on the dot of his promise on this problem.
On a related note, the looney left now has a new argument about illegal immigration, specifically that "mean old wall".
""Public service announcement: the border wall is even more problematic because animals and birds might be impacted. I wish I was kidding, but MSNBC ran a segment with biologist Jeff Corwin, where the latter said jaguars, the Mexican gray wolf, bats, and some birds might be impacted by the border wall’s construction.""
In the YouTube video included on the link, concerned is raised over a "100 species of MIGRATORY birds" that may be impacted by the wall...along with bats.
Yep....birds....and bats.....that can fly....like pretty high....like OVER a wall
And I've never heard the libbys complain about all those windmills we have and how many birds they kill. I've seen estimates that put the number in the hundreds of thousands. Lib on libbies, lib on
On a related note, the looney left now has a new argument about illegal immigration, specifically that "mean old wall".
""Public service announcement: the border wall is even more problematic because animals and birds might be impacted. I wish I was kidding, but MSNBC ran a segment with biologist Jeff Corwin, where the latter said jaguars, the Mexican gray wolf, bats, and some birds might be impacted by the border wall’s construction.""
In the YouTube video included on the link, concerned is raised over a "100 species of MIGRATORY birds" that may be impacted by the wall...along with bats.
Yep....birds....and bats.....that can fly....like pretty high....like OVER a wall
And I've never heard the libbys complain about all those windmills we have and how many birds they kill. I've seen estimates that put the number in the hundreds of thousands. Lib on libbies, lib on
Mac I was reading about the lawsuit and I was laughing so hard.
The right of asylum (sometimes called right of political asylum, from the ancient Greek word ?s????) is an ancient juridical concept, under which a person persecuted by their own country may be protected by another sovereign authority, such as another country or church official, who in medieval times could offer sanctuary. This right was already recognized by the Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Hebrews, from whom it was adopted into Western tradition. René Descartes fled to the Netherlands, Voltaire to England, and Thomas Hobbes to France, because each state offered protection to persecuted foreigners.
Domestic violence, as awful as it is, surely falls well short of being 'persecuted by one's own country'
It's a 'national domestic matter' for their own countries politicians police and community to deal with.
But, I've no doubt the loony libs will be scouring the planet for cases to choke up the courts
The right of asylum (sometimes called right of political asylum, from the ancient Greek word ?s????) is an ancient juridical concept, under which a person persecuted by their own country may be protected by another sovereign authority, such as another country or church official, who in medieval times could offer sanctuary. This right was already recognized by the Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Hebrews, from whom it was adopted into Western tradition. René Descartes fled to the Netherlands, Voltaire to England, and Thomas Hobbes to France, because each state offered protection to persecuted foreigners.
Domestic violence, as awful as it is, surely falls well short of being 'persecuted by one's own country'
It's a 'national domestic matter' for their own countries politicians police and community to deal with.
But, I've no doubt the loony libs will be scouring the planet for cases to choke up the courts
Yes, they do anything to advance their liberal ideas.
rainbowdream2017Melbourne, Victoria Australia2,486 posts
rmac318: Hey LJ
On a related note, the looney left now has a new argument about illegal immigration, specifically that "mean old wall".
""Public service announcement: the border wall is even more problematic because animals and birds might be impacted. I wish I was kidding, but MSNBC ran a segment with biologist Jeff Corwin, where the latter said jaguars, the Mexican gray wolf, bats, and some birds might be impacted by the border wall’s construction.""
In the YouTube video included on the link, concerned is raised over a "100 species of MIGRATORY birds" that may be impacted by the wall...along with bats.
Yep....birds....and bats.....that can fly....like pretty high....like OVER a wall
And I've never heard the libbys complain about all those windmills we have and how many birds they kill. I've seen estimates that put the number in the hundreds of thousands. Lib on libbies, lib on
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
(CNN)"The Supreme Court on Monday left in place a lower court opinion rejecting claims by undocumented Central American women and children -- who were apprehended immediately after arriving in the country without authorization -- seeking asylum.
Lawyers for the families sought to challenge their expedited removal proceedings in federal court arguing they face gender-based violence at home, but a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court held that they have no right to judicial review of such claims."
From CNN news today.
Looks like our elected President is on the dot of his promise on this problem.