Galactic_bodhi: No, your sticking to ad hominem and appeals to emotion rather than dealing with the issue as it stands. I don't care what they would have done. And an ad hoc committee is not the answer. Indictment is the answer! But, yah. You can't indict foreign nationals can you? And that's what this is going to boil down to.
But then, again, neither party really wants a real investigation and set of trials because they've all got their hands in the pie. Nobody is going to come out of this clean, least of all Obama. It'll be a question of who's cleaner, not who doesn't have any mud on them at all. We all know McCain "was" a maverick in his own party. Not anymore. He has an election to win. And that makes him a terrifying candidate to me, much more than Obama and his ambitions. Palin was the last straw for me. A "moderate" Republican choosing such a right-winger? He almost had my vote until that...
Heck, let's ignore all of it, and beef up our presence in the Middle East. That should solve everything. When you don't have a clue about what to do on domestic policy, stick to what you know, foreign policy. Kill everyone and let God sort it out.
Yes you can arrest and indict foreign nationals....just has to be done in the country within jurisdiction.
On Lehman Bro and AIG...the Fannies arrest and indict of the officials now after the damage has been is like a bankrupcy.....where you get a penny on the investment.
The real issue and problem here....is transparency.....where what is happening inside the companies is being discovered by gov't agencies. Here is where the SEC Chairman is on the hot seat......each of these companies is file quarterly financials because they are public traded companies. Those quarterly should have told the SEC that problems were there.
The SEC Chairman was a combination of the three blind mice and the three monkey that see no evil, hear no evil and say no evil. Why was the SEC silent on this till the bottom fell out and the flooding began? They had the quaterly financial of them......but likely just filed them and did not read them.
McCain wants his head. OK not literally.....wants his job. Obama is saying...everything is cool with me. GWB is saying everything is cool with me. Congress is saying we are going to write the check and everything is cool with us. GWb literally said he has confidence in the SEC Chairman. SEC Chairman just had 4 major firms in about 4 weeks do kamkizee on him.....his boat should be sinking by now.
Never thought sport would enter this thread,but bear with me.
Watched Manchester United today in a bar. AIG are their sponsors. Now I thought businesses sponsored things to get themselves publicity.Thing is despite spending no doubt vast sums I had no idea who AIG were..............
Until last week.They got publicity OK for the wrong reasons.
gongman: Never thought sport would enter this thread,but bear with me.
Watched Manchester United today in a bar. AIG are their sponsors. Now I thought businesses sponsored things to get themselves publicity.Thing is despite spending no doubt vast sums I had no idea who AIG were..............
Until last week.They got publicity OK for the wrong reasons.
And wasted their money sponsoring Man U.
AIG has or had thier fingers into a lot of different things.
Is Manchester United owned by the American that owns the Tampa Bay NFL team....?.....when the purchase was going down the Manchester fans were going to quit the club and send their life time tickets back? I am pretty sure I got that right.
There is you connection to AIG likely. They likely insure his NFL team here......and so get the chance to sponsor his club in England.
Well this week AIG scored two own goals, had a PK try blocked, and missed a gimmee walkin goal with the keeper out of play. And lost to a team that was down to 9.
Look at it like this.....now Manchester United is sponsored by the people of America that now own AIG.......and that little bit of trivia is good for a beer at your local pub. Make mine a cold one.....
I just had a chance to look at AIG Financials and two things struck me a odd. One the company is still paying a dividened and has been raising over the years. Second, in 2007 they made a 6 billion profit before this year losing 5.8 billion. I have to wonder what happened to all that money. I think the people at AIG decided its time to take the money run. Now the US owns 80% of the company as the apparant crooks have emptied the company. I think tax payer need to really question the wisdom of the Republican administration in these matters.
agman: I just had a chance to look at AIG Financials and two things struck me a odd. One the company is still paying a dividened and has been raising over the years. Second, in 2007 they made a 6 billion profit before this year losing 5.8 billion. I have to wonder what happened to all that money. I think the people at AIG decided its time to take the money run. Now the US owns 80% of the company as the apparant crooks have emptied the company. I think tax payer need to really question the wisdom of the Republican administration in these matters.
The dividend might be on a preferred stock......insurance companies have funny preferred stock programs. They are often like Utilities bonds......with various rate adjustments....pretty common in the industry if it is. But the rate should not be over........6 or 7 %. And yes preferred stocks can be held by a small group of insiders.
Check the two year operation costs.....2007 and 2008........in 2008 if they are taking a beating....it should be less than 2007 when they had profit. Also compare the salaries and wages of the two year......if the profit was being siphoned off.....they have to get it into the Corporate managment accounts someway. But that would be the most obvious thing to do....and easies to track.
See if they had a commission restructuring......that might be one way to do it. Likely is in the foot notes in wages and salaries. It would be massive to lose this kind of sums.
See if they had any new partnership or investments. Enron got into a number of partnership with small energy providers......they used them to inflate thier net worth. But in this case.....AIG is buying into them....then management could be getting a kickback of the buyin. The partnerships are nearly worthless, but a big dollar deal has been done....with everyone going home happy. Again should be in the foot notes of the investment section.
Did they lay off staff and employees in 2008? Or did they stay with a full compliment from the 2007.
Does it say how many SEC filing they made in 2007 and 2008? Sometimes they get a extension on a quarterly.......but they should met have 3 of the 4 both years. If the SEC was not getting quarterlies...then they had to know something was going on here.
Well when they made it big in 2007 they knew it was time to take and run. In this day of instance information one does not have to know what the problem is when the stock price is dropping. That alone sends the institutional investers scrambling to get out. Now they want to work out a quick deal with the US. Why not take some time and think it through appropiately. As. a stock holder I personally don't think investment banking is a good deal and I am forced to be a stock holder of AIG. Maybe the government should ask the people of America if they want to be a stock holder in an investment bank. Those who want can buy stock in AIG, those who don't may want to buy stock in oil industry.
agman: Well when they made it big in 2007 they knew it was time to take and run. In this day of instance information one does not have to know what the problem is when the stock price is dropping. That alone sends the institutional investers scrambling to get out. Now they want to work out a quick deal with the US. Why not take some time and think it through appropiately. As. a stock holder I personally don't think investment banking is a good deal and I am forced to be a stock holder of AIG. Maybe the government should ask the people of America if they want to be a stock holder in an investment bank. Those who want can buy stock in AIG, those who don't may want to buy stock in oil industry.
Again MHO
Agman, I all for an investigation of AIG to air out thier dirty laundry. Also for where the $700 b economic plackage is heading.
The gov't can give intrimin bridge capitol to keep them operating while it is done. So I don't see why this has to be done in a week time with out the investigation.
After the investigation....you know what you got or don't have. Then make the decision to place the American people on the hook for the $85b for AIG.
Agman, say you are a major investor....with big bucks.....would you buy a company with out doing 'due diligence' on it? Send them $85 b without tearing apart the financials and knowing the contracts, revenue flows, staff...etc?
This is business 101 here. And the Federal Government of the United States is not doing it.
Again is worries me that an incompentent republican administration, the one that brought us the Iraq war, Katrina, who knows what they are doing in Galveston now, now wants to bailout AIG at the expense of the average American. Maybe we should just wait till next year when the election is over and let the new president decide the proper course. Any thoughts?
agman: Again is worries me that an incompentent republican administration, the one that brought us the Iraq war, Katrina, who knows what they are doing in Galveston now, now wants to bailout AIG at the expense of the average American. Maybe we should just wait till next year when the election is over and let the new president decide the proper course. Any thoughts?
dazzling_dave: The longer it lays, the more it will stink.
I do believe that an investigation should be done before a bail out is considered.
Obama would not like that at all. His top three economic advisors are the ones responsible. If there were an investigation, it would hurt Obama's campaign. And what the heck was he thinking by hiring these crooks? What does it tell you???
WhatUwish4: Obama would not like that at all. His top three economic advisors are the ones responsible. If there were an investigation, it would hurt Obama's campaign. And what the heck was he thinking by hiring these crooks? What does it tell you???
Being a product of one of the most corrupt political machines in the country, what do you expect?
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
But then, again, neither party really wants a real investigation and set of trials because they've all got their hands in the pie. Nobody is going to come out of this clean, least of all Obama. It'll be a question of who's cleaner, not who doesn't have any mud on them at all. We all know McCain "was" a maverick in his own party. Not anymore. He has an election to win. And that makes him a terrifying candidate to me, much more than Obama and his ambitions. Palin was the last straw for me. A "moderate" Republican choosing such a right-winger? He almost had my vote until that...
Heck, let's ignore all of it, and beef up our presence in the Middle East. That should solve everything. When you don't have a clue about what to do on domestic policy, stick to what you know, foreign policy. Kill everyone and let God sort it out.
Yes you can arrest and indict foreign nationals....just has to be done in the country within jurisdiction.
On Lehman Bro and AIG...the Fannies arrest and indict of the officials now after the damage has been is like a bankrupcy.....where you get
a penny on the investment.
The real issue and problem here....is transparency.....where what is happening inside the companies is being discovered by gov't agencies.
Here is where the SEC Chairman is on the hot seat......each of these companies is file quarterly financials because they are public traded companies. Those quarterly should have told the SEC that problems were there.
The SEC Chairman was a combination of the three blind mice and the
three monkey that see no evil, hear no evil and say no evil. Why was the SEC silent on this till the bottom fell out and the flooding began?
They had the quaterly financial of them......but likely just filed them and did not read them.
McCain wants his head. OK not literally.....wants his job. Obama is saying...everything is cool with me. GWB is saying everything is cool
with me. Congress is saying we are going to write the check and
everything is cool with us. GWb literally said he has confidence in the
SEC Chairman. SEC Chairman just had 4 major firms in about 4 weeks
do kamkizee on him.....his boat should be sinking by now.