This online dating game makes you believe you have a lot of options to choose from. Then we are disappointed that they are not real. You can say you only communicate with those who are in reasonable distance with you and you can manage to grab a coffee together for a chat. Then you are in the real world. I think it's unreasonable to believe that long distance relationships are real in big numbers. Yes, there are stories we heard. But we heard people won lottery too.
1 week doesn’t sound that bad. Is there any torture? Apart from the fact there will be no action just blah blah… Btw, do you know the shortest sentence in English: “I do”, actually the longest sentence?
"Where you say hard" <-- some people think about dating as other meaning of hard...
Is it the "what was first, the chicken or the egg" question again? I guess dating is first, then relationship. When it's a relationship then it's all a different game. Doesn't mean you cannot fail in that although still dating.
You can also say "searching" that might better describe the state. Or "rejecting" maybe in most cases. Or more precisely "searching for reasons to reject".
RE: Dating in the 21st century
This online dating game makes you believe you have a lot of options to choose from. Then we are disappointed that they are not real.You can say you only communicate with those who are in reasonable distance with you and you can manage to grab a coffee together for a chat.
Then you are in the real world.
I think it's unreasonable to believe that long distance relationships are real in big numbers.
Yes, there are stories we heard. But we heard people won lottery too.