When an institution reaches the degree of corruption, brazen cynicism and dishonor demonstrated by the U.N. in its shameful history, to discuss it at length is to imply that its members and supporters may possibly be making an innocent error about its nature—which is no longer possible. There is no margin for error about a monstrosity that was created for the alleged purpose of preventing wars by uniting the world against any aggressor, but proceeded to unite it against any victim of aggression. The expulsion of a charter member, the Republic of China—an action forbidden by the U.N.’s own Charter—was a “moment of truth,” a naked display of the United Nations’ soul.
What was Red China’s qualification for membership in the U.N.? The fact that her government seized power by force, and has maintained it for twenty-two years by terror. What disqualified Nationalist China? The fact that she was a friend of the United States.
The Ayn Rand Letter
“The Shanghai Gesture,” The Ayn Rand Letter, I, 14, 1
might need that Line-item-Veto back,or absolutely stop loading down Essential Bills with Crap.that has nothing to do with it. Let a Bill stand or fall on its own merits!
online today!Conrad73 Forum Posts (59,477)
How about you?
RE: Terrorism In The United States
no better than the Radical Muslims!