Class5Class5 Forum Posts (1,010)

RE: osama bin laden is

This is quite a lame effort. Who are you kidding? rolling on the floor laughing

RE: osama bin laden is

Just report him. You've asked him to stop his libellous defamation on several occasions and he has refused your request. The whole place is sick of this guy.

RE: osama bin laden is

Funny song. I find redbacks in my garage. They're tiny and only usually bite when annoyed, but the Funnel-Web is big and aggressive!

Embedded image from another site

RE: osama bin laden is

Just his usual BS. yawn

RE: osama bin laden is

There's a thing. doh You act like an a**hole and wonder why people don't like you.

doh

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Why would he do that? His obsessive prejudice is focused on the British. roll eyes

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

I wasn't talking about his opinion of Israel, it's typical of his ethnicity. God, learn to read previous posts instead of wandering in and spruiking nonsense. If you took the time to read we were discussing Imperial history.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

I see he's trying to hide his blatant anti-semitism these days. It's not working.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

rolling on the floor laughing Differing views = making crap up. Lame Paldi, lame.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

And just who is this one, Conrad?

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

rolling on the floor laughing And who might you be? I see, a friend of a certain Greek? get your facts straight.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Debated in great detail? You're killing me with laughter! rolling on the floor laughing

You strung a few historical events together, threw in a few fictitious stories and events, and using spit and wax you made a fairy tale. rolling on the floor laughing

This is priceless! rolling on the floor laughing

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

I have to agree with you there. Do any of them know or care about the population's interests? I lost faith in our politicians some time ago when the Democrats caved in under Lees and Labor became conservative. sigh

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Yeah, yeah yawn

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

If the Libs had any sense, they'd give the leadership back to Turnball before the next election. It's a big 'if' though. laugh

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Oh, for sure. The man is a fool with an outdated ideaology. He would set us back 50 years.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Let us hope so, for politically and economically, our nation lacks leadership and vision at the moment.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Actually Rob, I don't think this issue was ever about 'trust' as such. This is spilling over from another finished thread where many unfounded accusations and wild theories were posited by a certain person (who shall remain nameless). I've studied enough History and Politics to know that every nation, even ours, works to further their own interests. No exceptions.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

It was to unite the Levant and Mesopotamia under Faisal upon the Ottoman fall, if I recall correctly. However, many parties involved, British, French & some Arab tribes had other ideas.

"Contrary to later myth, it was neither Lawrence nor the Army that conceived a campaign of internal insurgency against the Ottoman Empire in the Middle East, but rather the Arab Bureau of Britain's Foreign Office. The Arab Bureau had long felt it likely that a campaign instigated and financed by outside powers, supporting the breakaway-minded tribes and regional challengers to the Turkish government's centralised rule of their empire, would pay great dividends in the diversion of effort that would be needed to meet such a challenge. The Arab Bureau had recognised the strategic value of what is today called the "asymmetry" of such conflict. The Ottoman authorities would have to devote from a hundred to a thousand times the resources to contain the threat of such an internal rebellion compared to the Allies' cost of sponsoring it.

At that point in the Foreign Office's thinking, the region was not considered candidate territories for incorporation in the British Empire but only as an extension of the range of British Imperial influence and the weakening and destruction of a German ally, the Ottoman Empire."




The link provides an extensive bibliography for further study.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Yes well, the T. E. Lawrence episode is common knowledge, however, it is naive not to mention that he made promises he had no authority to make. Look into it.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Exactly! Doesn't UN resolution 181 prove it? crazy redclown

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

It's a plot by the British Monarchy to create propaganda on CS in an attempt to try and cover up their Imperial designs.

rolling on the floor laughing

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

rolling on the floor laughing So, I tell you who emailed me so you can go and harass them? I'm sorry, but I'm nowhere near as stupid as you. rolling on the floor laughing

wave

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Yeah, like where China was part of the British Empire and the British 'partitioned' Tibet & Taiwan.

crazy

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

Why are you so racially prejudiced against the British anyway? You're obsessed with them.

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

rolling on the floor laughing You are trying to twist and lie again Max. You know damn well that I was stating the cause of the war, but everyone knows and sees what you're up to. I received emails from people who don't even post on the forums and whom I've never heard of, but I'm not going to give you any names. I'm not as stupid as you are.

You are so pathetic. Does you Momma know you're on the internet? rolling on the floor laughing

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

I could proof, translate or interpret it if you like. I've become adept at deciphering this clown's ramblings. rolling on the floor laughing

RE: United Nations Resolution 181 - would you have voted for it if it were held now?

rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing Wow! And all the emails I received commented on what a liar you proved to be. You made a complete fool of yourself in that thread. It was beautiful! rolling on the floor laughing

RE: ......america women and their love with visa....lol !!!!!!....

Hey Conrad! Good to see you. The idiots have been running rampant in here lately.

The purpose? I think it's just to piss as many people off as possible, while the op plays the innocent card.

This is a list of forum posts created by Class5.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here