That is beside my point! I am not talking about addition and substraction, i'm merely saying that there isn't much difference between a 16, 17, and 18, year old, in regards to who among them is good for a man over 30.
Would you be happy if your mature 16 year old, dated a 35 year old? Should a 17.something year old be considered an adult, old enough to date a 50 year old, next tuesday on her birthday? Some mature early, some don't, but i don't think there's one mature enough to date a man too mature. That's my point!
This is my opinion, i am a kid to women your age, which i really don't mind at all. Not at all!
What's the difference between a 16, 17, and 18 year old?
They are all kids to me. 18 year olds should probably be dating 20-23 year olds, not grown up men, old enough to be their fathers/grandfathers. The thought is just appalling!
Sweetie, you're from Brazil, and i'm sure you know it happens there too. Do you really blame these young girls for trying to survive? They are kids! What do they know?
I also find it strange, that a man that old would date a 17- 23 year old girl. I know they are considered adults, but what in the world would a man over 30, have in common with a girl that young? What do they talk about?
I guess it's none of my business, but i do find it uncomfortably unorthodox too.
I personally would date a man around 44, despite the different mental inclinations, brought about by experiences.
lusciousmile Forum Posts (11,989)
+ 
RE: McCain or Obama? FIVE DAYS MORE!
I don't know about the finns, but i know a few Kenyans who will have a few!