Noahs Ark ( Archived) (292)

Feb 23, 2010 1:45 PM CST Noahs Ark
princemuncher
princemuncherprincemunchernorthfield, Ohio USA12 Threads 378 Posts
emannigol: Of course they are. And your point is?
So? Psalms aren't part of Torah or Pentateuch.

Psalms are part of the OT. Written supposedly by David (a Jew).

No, they're not part of the first five books of the Bible, but Jesus refers to Psalms as well as Genesis. The Bible is supposed to be the inerrant word of god. Psalms would be included to self-substantiate the story.

The point of the plagurized flood myth is that Noah is taken as absolute truth, when the story existed long before Genesis.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 1:51 PM CST Noahs Ark
openchick
openchickopenchickPetawawa, Ontario Canada102 Posts
emannigol: Of course they are. And your point is?
So? Psalms aren't part of Torah or Pentateuch.


That is only because MEN decided that it would be so when they were talking about what books they would and wouldn't include in it.

They are all separate books that were compiled by MEN, so it not being a part of that particular book means nothing, as it was MEN who decided what book went where.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 2:07 PM CST Noahs Ark
emannigol
emannigolemannigolJossakin Pirkanmaalla, Southern Finland Finland356 Posts
openchick: That is only because MEN decided that it would be so when they were talking about what books they would and wouldn't include in it.

They are all separate books that were compiled by MEN, so it not being a part of that particular book means nothing, as it was MEN who decided what book went where.


It means a lot when they were written if were trying to understand their meaning for the culture which wrote them. Torah is the most important part of the Bible for jews; other books aren't as important.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 2:12 PM CST Noahs Ark
openchick
openchickopenchickPetawawa, Ontario Canada102 Posts
emannigol: It means a lot when they were written if were trying to understand their meaning for the culture which wrote them. Torah is the most important part of the Bible for jews; other books aren't as important.


Many of the books of the OT were written at the same time but were left out. My point is that, although you are right in saying that it is important to studying the culture, you shouldn't exclude books merely because they are not part of the torah. What about books that were written at the same time that are part of the dead sea scrolls?

What about the non canonical books that were left out?

Are they not as important a study of the culture as the ones that were arbitrarily included?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 2:25 PM CST Noahs Ark
emannigol
emannigolemannigolJossakin Pirkanmaalla, Southern Finland Finland356 Posts
openchick: Many of the books of the OT were written at the same time but were left out. My point is that, although you are right in saying that it is important to studying the culture, you shouldn't exclude books merely because they are not part of the torah. What about books that were written at the same time that are part of the dead sea scrolls?

What about the non canonical books that were left out?

Are they not as important a study of the culture as the ones that were arbitrarily included?


Actually I don't think there are any uncanonized books left from the time of Torah. Not even any Jewish books written at the same time.

Uncanonized books which are part of Qumran findings are from the time after Ketuvim was canonized; which is considered as the least important part of Tanakh (or the Old Testament).

So Psalms hardly give any insight for studying Torah which was canonized hundreds of years before psalms were written. dunno

It's like saying biblical deluge myth is giving insight for studying Epic of Gilgamesh which is a lot older.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 2:37 PM CST Noahs Ark
openchick
openchickopenchickPetawawa, Ontario Canada102 Posts
emannigol: Actually I don't think there are any uncanonized books left from the time of Torah. Not even any Jewish books written at the same time.

Uncanonized books which are part of Qumran findings are from the time after Ketuvim was canonized; which is considered as the least important part of Tanakh (or the Old Testament).

So Psalms hardly give any insight for studying Torah which was canonized hundreds of years before psalms were written.

It's like saying biblical deluge myth is giving insight for studying Epic of Gilgamesh which is a lot older.


I think that the original point was that all of the stories are completely unsupported by evidence as far as the veracity of their claims.

No one disputes the usefulness of the study of them in order to extrapolate historical truths. (not that I know of)

We DO dispute the veracity of the god claim.

Unless you have evidence to show us why we are wrong.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 2:53 PM CST Noahs Ark
emannigol
emannigolemannigolJossakin Pirkanmaalla, Southern Finland Finland356 Posts
openchick: I think that the original point was that all of the stories are completely unsupported by evidence as far as the veracity of their claims.


I was only pointing that Biblical deluge lasted (according to Bible) around ten months instead of just 40 day and nights as in OP. This common misconseption is shared by believers and unbelievers.

My second point was that according to Bible waters were dried by the wind instead of disappearing into underground or where ever as speculated by somebody else in this thread.

I wasn't saying anything about the credibility of such events. roll eyes
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 2:55 PM CST Noahs Ark
openchick
openchickopenchickPetawawa, Ontario Canada102 Posts
emannigol: I was only pointing that Biblical deluge lasted (according to Bible) around ten months instead of just 40 day and nights as in OP. This common misconseption is shared by believers and unbelievers.

My second point was that according to Bible waters were dried by the wind instead of disappearing into underground or where ever as speculated by somebody else in this thread.

I wasn't saying anything about the credibility of such events.


AHHH, gotcha.

I know that he was supposed to have been there for longer than 40 days, but that only makes it even more impossible.

It actually goes to help disprove the story.

ANd you are right about the wind of course.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 4:06 PM CST Noahs Ark
cgedvr
cgedvrcgedvrSo. Cal, California USA40 Threads 2,088 Posts
openchick: That is only because MEN decided that it would be so when they were talking about what books they would and wouldn't include in it.

They are all separate books that were compiled by MEN, so it not being a part of that particular book means nothing, as it was MEN who decided what book went where.
I could be mistaken but sounds like someone is angry at MENhug hug hug
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 4:10 PM CST Noahs Ark
cgedvr: I could be mistaken but sounds like someone is angry at MEN
confused confused confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 23, 2010 8:07 PM CST Noahs Ark
katt1017
katt1017katt1017Southern, New Hampshire USA67 Threads 10 Polls 1,384 Posts
So if you nonbelievers are so smart why are you here arguing all day instead of working at some high paying job worthy of such great minds?

While were at it, being so wonderful why is it you are still single?

The story of the ark is not supposed to be taken literally. It is allegorical of salvation (as I understand it). We are a culture that does not deal in parable or allegories as much as others do. Look at the stories according to the culture that wrote them not your own.

As someone else pointed out Strong's concordance is a good tool for doing that.











Employed (great pay and benefits)and married to a great woman (also employed and a person with her own faith).

------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 2:00 AM CST Noahs Ark
katt1017: So if you nonbelievers are so smart why are you here arguing all day instead of working at some high paying job worthy of such great minds?

While were at it, being so wonderful why is it you are still single?

The story of the ark is not supposed to be taken literally. It is allegorical of salvation (as I understand it). We are a culture that does not deal in parable or allegories as much as others do. Look at the stories according to the culture that wrote them not your own.

As someone else pointed out Strong's concordance is a good tool for doing that.Employed (great pay and benefits)and married to a great woman (also employed and a person with her own faith).

That's why we are given such exact measurements of the Vessel,or are they allegorical too?confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 2:07 AM CST Noahs Ark
steve6610
steve6610steve6610Goolwa, South Australia Australia2,184 Posts
ooby_dooby: As a retired engineer I think you'll appreciate this little excersize.

The arc was 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide and 30 cubits high. A cubit is about 18 inches. That works out to 450 feet long by 75 feet wide by 45 feet high. That's 1,518,750 cubic feet displacement. To stand up to the forces of the ocean etc the thickness of the "Gopherwood" hull would have to be a min of 6 inches. This works out to a volume of wood equal to 40,500 cubic feet. Gopherwood is closely similar to Cyprus which weighs about 30 lbs per cubic foot for a total weight of wood of 1,214,970 pounds or 607 tons of cut, shaped and fitted wood. How long would it take a big strong man to cut down a Cyprus tree (they grow in a swamp remember) trim the branches haul it to the construction site, shape it into timber suitable for the hull of a ship? Also, as he/they felled trees closest to the build site (using stone axe's remember because this was before the bronze age, no chain saws or even steel) they had to haul the logs from farther and farther away.

A man would be lucky to drop a cyprus tree by chopping at it with a stone axe all day. What shape would he be in to repeat this process the next day and the next several thousand times and that's just gathering enough wood to build a ship that size. It would take over 3 years of back breaking work 7 days a week to assemble that much wood. Forget about the actual building of the ship which would have been beyond Noah and his familys ability. This doesn't even touch on the wood needed for the internal structure of the ship, stalls, decks, food bunkers, etc. Did the ship have a roof or did all the animals just get soaking wet for 40 days and nights?
I could go on & on & on proving by simple logic and math that the story of Noahs Arc is totally false, a myth.


I do like what you said, but I have heard so many of these arguments from engineers in particular that if it seems impossible then it was .

Lets see a group of engineers have also recently stated on their logic the pyramids werent constructed as to how we believe they were , that the Easter island statues werent constructed at all.

Even my brother in law who is an engineer questions many of his fellow colleagues

so putting aside logic , knowledge , etc isnt it possible many things we think were in fact impossible may well be handshake
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 4:02 AM CST Noahs Ark
EliteOne
EliteOneEliteOneBrisbane, Queensland Australia38 Threads 1,590 Posts
RillyNiceGuy: If creation (about six thousand years ago) took place as it is said in the Bible, then the people and the animals had not yet covered the face of the global Earth.
The people's were in a small area and so were (samples of) the animals of the Earth(land).
After the flood and the ship landed, just as people's are varied today from only those small few people......so with animals.
Look at the birds called Budgies.....all of the colors we see today and varities are from inbreeding within a short time (about 100 years) from the wild green. This COULD account for BY the same reason there are many types of many animals today.

The beginning of people and animals was local and the flood could have been global or local....if local then the animals (samples of) of the Earth(land) could have been fewer than we know or understand. Local flood, local people, local animals could have made it possible as well. Both ideas are possible.

To those who are not read.....your remarks will be unsound until you study the subject deeply and understand things beyond the scope of time here.


Talking about not knowing your own thoughts? A while back your six day creation happened over 6000 years? confused

RillyNiceGuy: God is making a short work of seven thousand years. Each thousand years is as a day and a day is as a thousand years. From Adam until the end of the thousand year rein of Christ is a week of days. (one thousand years each.) When the term latter days and end of days is used it means the latter days of that prophetic week....not the end of all 24 hour days as some think is the end of the world. If one knows this, one can see the time of the death of Christ was in its proper day of that week the same as that of the pascal lamb of Passover and from that time....we are now ending the latter day before the coming of the Sabbath rest of Christs rein. We are at the end of a day and most of us will see or our children will see the return of Christ. Those of his shall enter into his rest....the seventh day as was always and not the first.(Sunday) Much more is understood from the knowing that a day is as a thousand years of that week of days. Count the days to the return of Christ. if you do not know when Christ paid our debt.....look at passover and the Pascal lamb....which he was for us.....the lamb of God.

I hope this opens understanding for those called.

In the 6000 thousand years since the creation, nations upon nation have been whipped out along with animal spice upon animal specie and now you are saying there was not enough animals on this earth in a 6000 year creation. Get a grip on your analogies.doh Rabbits alone multiply at such a fast rate something like 5 squared X 7 squared per year.. Even in slower breading animals like Elephants, lets take a mathematical tour 7 squared X 6000 = 294,000 and that is only form one pair not including another couple of thousand years since the creation to Noahs flood frustrated I’m pretty sure that more atheists could and would present more convincing arguments for the bible if the roll was reversed then any Christian! Because, we actually spent time analysing the value and the authenticity the bible holds.
grin
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 4:25 AM CST Noahs Ark
steve6610
steve6610steve6610Goolwa, South Australia Australia2,184 Posts
EliteOne: Talking about not knowing your own thoughts? A while back your six day creation happened over 6000 years? In the 6000 thousand years since the creation, nations upon nation have been whipped out along with animal spice upon animal specie and now you are saying there was not enough animals on this earth in a 6000 year creation. Get a grip on your analogies. Rabbits alone multiply at such a fast rate something like 5 squared X 7 squared per year.. Even in slower breading animals like Elephants, lets take a mathematical tour 7 squared X 6000 = 294,000 and that is only form one pair not including another couple of thousand years since the creation to Noahs flood I’m pretty sure that more atheists could and would present more convincing arguments for the bible if the roll was reversed then any Christian! Because, we actually spent time analysing the value and the authenticity the bible holds.



great post mate thumbs up , the biggest problem I find is that a lot of fellow christians literally take what is written as fact. like the creation in 6 days, the flood, etc.... instead of looking at the big picture.

the other fave of mine is they always say there is a heaven , but if they actually go by what they read it says Heavans & Earth , which is more than 1 handshake
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 4:30 AM CST Noahs Ark
Blues63
Blues63Blues63Brisbane, Queensland Australia6 Threads 1 Polls 2,934 Posts
It's more than likely that the deluge was merely the flooding of the Tigris and Euphrates; the 'world' of the inhabitants. This story has many correlations as does the 'hero in basket floating down a river' story. Most myths and stories have an element of truth, but hyperbole through time creates the tales that circulate to this day.
But if someones chooses to believe said stories in the literal sense, so what?
dunno
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 4:31 AM CST Noahs Ark
Impact
ImpactImpactFort Smith, Arkansas USA8 Threads 177 Posts
I have not read all of the posts, but will reply to this as an option.
Some of what happen back than, and told as the entire world, was just the known world at that time.
If the ark came to rest on Mount Ararat, the the entire world could not have been covered.
And then the question is, how far up the mountain, what was the elevation?
And the ark might did not have to be sea worthy as in rough seas, if there were no large waves,,, it may have just been standing water so to speak.
From what I have read,,, it was not a ship like vessel, but more of a rectangle box like craft.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 4:34 AM CST Noahs Ark
Blues63: It's more than likely that the deluge was merely the flooding of the Tigris and Euphrates; the 'world' of the inhabitants. This story has many correlations as does the 'hero in basket floating down a river' story. Most myths and stories have an element of truth, but hyperbole through time creates the tales that circulate to this day.
But if someones chooses to believe said stories in the literal sense, so what?
and there is some evidence for floodings like that.
But the Ark,and Noah,need to take that with a large Dose of Sodium Chloride!laugh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 4:34 AM CST Noahs Ark
EliteOne
EliteOneEliteOneBrisbane, Queensland Australia38 Threads 1,590 Posts
steve6610: great post mate , the biggest problem I find is that a lot of fellow christians literally take what is written as fact. like the creation in 6 days, the flood, etc.... instead of looking at the big picture.

the other fave of mine is they always say there is a heaven , but if they actually go by what they read it says Heavans & Earth , which is more than 1
The real Confucius would not talk philosophy until the student was well educated in poetry first. Same for the bible, it uses parables and is opened for interpretation. beer
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 24, 2010 4:39 AM CST Noahs Ark
steve6610
steve6610steve6610Goolwa, South Australia Australia2,184 Posts
EliteOne: The real Confucius would not talk philosophy until the student was well educated in poetry first. Same for the bible, it uses parables and is opened for interpretation.



bowing bowing I am in total agreeance with you, I know other christians will tell me off , but hey i can live with that.

as you said its open for interpretation & discussion as all aspects of history, science, philosophy & culture are.

Our life is a giant learning curve we learn each & every day & if we take everything as is written 7 say thats it this is the only facts to live by & follow , then we all lead a boring & very shallow life & existence cheers
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here