Condor009Victoria, British Columbia Canada200 Posts
Condor009Victoria, British Columbia Canada200 posts
spikkels999: On this site:- Human rights
Are not protected...
Humans are NOT an endangered species on Earth, if anything, they are are a pestilence upon Earth, so how can they be so termed to achieve "human rights" ? Far more animal lives are endangered... The problem really starts with which human group to endanger.... pick by lottery perhaps?
Condor009: Humans are NOT an endangered species on Earth, if anything, they are are a pestilence upon Earth, so how can they be so termed to achieve "human rights" ? Far more animal lives are endangered... The problem really starts with which human group to endanger.... pick by lottery perhaps?
Someone insults you publicly on social media, and nothing happens...that's a travesty...and totally illegal...
Where were you appointed, no-custodian of earth...?
Butcher559: The rights of the average persons are about on the same level, Billy Gates, Errol Musk and Jim Bezos may have a few more rights than the average..
Thus selective rights for some made up illegal reason...
And it would be a twisted take on human rights anyway. To spend good money on Twitter police who guard the first worlder from his most sensitive and trivial of concerns in a world where some people have to walk miles to the nearest infected water? That's not human rights, it's superior rights for first world weaklords.
The concept of "Rights", as ideally developed, (in the United States, @ Colonial beginnings...) would to some, seem over-reaching. For example, several journalists throughout the decades and centuries have stated this very American adage:
"It is better for ten guilty to be acquitted than for one innocent to be hanged"
rohaan: The concept of "Rights", as ideally developed, (in the United States, @ Colonial beginnings...) would to some, seem over-reaching. For example, several journalists throughout the decades and centuries have stated this very American adage:
"It is better for ten guilty to be acquitted than for one innocent to be hanged"
So, to the ones who gave this a "thumbs-down"--do you believe it is better, then, to sacrifice an innocent in order to get the guilty punished? Just wondering....if so, do you believe it wise to burn down a house to catch a rat? Just wondering....
rohaan: So, to the ones who gave this a "thumbs-down"--do you believe it is better, then, to sacrifice an innocent in order to get the guilty punished? Just wondering....if so, do you believe it wise to burn down a house to catch a rat? Just wondering....
No...everyone must be saved...killing is wrong...in all events...
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Human rights
Are not protected...