This is the part I choose to come in on of an essay which was originally published in Nexus Magaxine last year..........
At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects: Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus (Historia Ecclesiastica, Eusebius, c. 325). Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them.
To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god.
A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities became one God. Following longstanding heathen custom, Constantine used the official gathering and the Roman apotheosis decree to legally deify two deities as one, and did so by democratic consent.
A new god was proclaimed and "officially" ratified by Constantine (Acta Concilii Nicaeni, 1618). That purely political act of deification effectively and legally placed Hesus and Krishna among the Roman gods as one individual composite.
That abstraction lent Earthly existence to amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new religion.
How the Gospels were created
Constantine then instructed Eusebius to organise the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the council. His instructions were:
"Search ye these books, and whatever is good in them, that retain; but whatsoever is evil, that cast away. What is good in one book, unite ye with that which is good in another book. And whatsoever is thus brought together shall be called The Book of Books. And it shall be the doctrine of my people, which I will recommend unto all nations, that there shall be no more war for religions' sake." (God's Book of Eskra, op. cit., chapter xlviii, paragraph 31)
"Make them to astonish" said Constantine, and "the books were written accordingly" (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, pp. 36-39).
Eusebius amalgamated the "legendary tales of all the religious doctrines of the world together as one", using the standard god-myths from the presbyters' manuscripts as his exemplars.
Merging the supernatural "god" stories of Mithra and Krishna with British Culdean beliefs effectively joined the orations of Eastern and Western presbyters together "to form a new universal belief" (ibid.). Constantine believed that the amalgamated collection of myths would unite variant and opposing religious factions under one representative story.
Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce "fifty sumptuous copies ... to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art" (ibid.). "These orders," said Eusebius, "were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself ... we sent him magnificently and elaborately bound volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms" (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p. 36). They were the "New Testimonies", and this is the first mention (c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record.
trish123: This is the part I choose to come in on of an essay which was originally published in Nexus Magaxine last year..........
At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects: Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus (Historia Ecclesiastica, Eusebius, c. 325). Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them.
That abstraction lent Earthly existence to amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new religion.How the Gospels were created
Constantine then instructed Eusebius to organise the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the council. His instructions were:
"Make them to astonish" said Constantine, and "the books were written accordingly" (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, pp. 36-39).
Eusebius amalgamated the "legendary tales of all the religious doctrines of the world together as one", using the standard god-myths from the presbyters' manuscripts as his exemplars.
Merging the supernatural "god" stories of Mithra and Krishna with British Culdean beliefs effectively joined the orations of Eastern and Western presbyters together "to form a new universal belief" (ibid.). Constantine believed that the amalgamated collection of myths would unite variant and opposing religious factions under one representative story.
Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce "fifty sumptuous copies ... to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art" (ibid.). "These orders," said Eusebius, "were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself ... we sent him magnificently and elaborately bound volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms" (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p. 36). They were the "New Testimonies", and this is the first mention (c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record.
Josephus's inclusion in this travesty is no small part. Josephus was a jew, who led the Jews in their fight against the Romans, long after the so called christ was already dead and risen (yaya BS) . He as leader, however, made a deal to stop the war on conditons provided by the the Roman Empire.
All through history, the stories and parables that began in Sumar were stolen, or adopted by the Empire that ruled that time. However before Rome used the stories, all other Empires used saviors that were national, the Persians used persian saviors and gods, the Egyptians used Egyptian saviours and gods ... but , when we get to the Romans, they used a Jewish saviour
Not so confusing really, the Romans could careless what nationality the savior was, they knew it was BS from the start anyway. So, enter Josephus, a jew, who takes a Roman name after being the leader of the Jewish forces, is given liberal funds to edit the bible, change the names within the faerie tale, to reflect jewish names and make some promises that will happen for the jews many many years later, promising that the jews will get their place in heaven, yada yada. Odd they would do that and then make it the property of the Roman Catholic Church, governing body of the jewish faery tale Not odd really , power mongers will do that as long as they keep the power, you can have any dreams and fantasies you want.
druidess6308: Thank you. I know quite a bit about what was decided at the Nicean council, but didn't know this part. Cool!
I did know that it was there that it was decided that Christ was divine, and that subsequently many changes were made to the books.
All of this is why I can't consider it a "holy" book...and this just added to that feeling.
Awesome post, Trish!
Thanks Dru - there really is so much to see and learn isnt there if we dont limit our perceptual abilities...........
I love history - theres a theory that its told by the victors and I dont doubt thats true - but its also an ongoing event - the losers now will be later to win - cos the times they are a changin.............
BnaturAl: This is the part I choose to come in on of an essay which was originally published in Nexus Magaxine last year..........
At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects: Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus (Historia Ecclesiastica, Eusebius, c. 325). Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them.
That abstraction lent Earthly existence to amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new religion.How the Gospels were created
Constantine then instructed Eusebius to organise the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the council. His instructions were:
"Make them to astonish" said Constantine, and "the books were written accordingly" (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, pp. 36-39).
Eusebius amalgamated the "legendary tales of all the religious doctrines of the world together as one", using the standard god-myths from the presbyters' manuscripts as his exemplars.
Merging the supernatural "god" stories of Mithra and Krishna with British Culdean beliefs effectively joined the orations of Eastern and Western presbyters together "to form a new universal belief" (ibid.). Constantine believed that the amalgamated collection of myths would unite variant and opposing religious factions under one representative story.
Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce "fifty sumptuous copies ... to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art" (ibid.). "These orders," said Eusebius, "were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself ... we sent him
Josephus's inclusion in this travesty is no small part. Josephus was a jew, who led the Jews in their fight against the Romans, long after the so called christ was already dead and risen (yaya BS) . He as leader, however, made a deal to stop the war on conditons provided by the the Roman Empire.
All through history, the stories and parables that began in Sumar were stolen, or adopted by the Empire that ruled that time. However before Rome used the stories, all other Empires used saviors that were national, the Persians used persian saviors and gods, the Egyptians used Egyptian saviours and gods ... but , when we get to the Romans, they used a Jewish saviour
Not so confusing really, the Romans could careless what nationality the savior was, they knew it was BS from the start anyway. So, enter Josephus, a jew, who takes a Roman name after being the leader of the Jewish forces, is given liberal funds to edit the bible, change the names within the faerie tale, to reflect jewish names and make some promises that will happen for the jews many many years later, promising that the jews will get their place in heaven, yada yada. Odd they would do that and then make it the property of the Roman Catholic Church, governing body of the jewish faery tale Not odd really , power mongers will do that as long as they keep the power, you can have any dreams and fantasies you want.
Nice one AL
Josephus was more remarkable by the stuff he didnt record - Bethlehem for one thing - but recently I was looking at the tale of the Holy Innocents, the babies who Herod supposedly had killed - although Josephus was accurate in many areas, he was remarkably remiss on the life of Jesus and the incident of the Holy Innocents too...... as were other contemporary historians.......
trish123: Thanks Dru - there really is so much to see and learn isnt there if we dont limit our perceptual abilities...........
I love history - theres a theory that its told by the victors and I dont doubt thats true - but its also an ongoing event - the losers now will be later to win - cos the times they are a changin.............
Morning darlin...it's always nice to read your threads and your opinion...
There is a forum on ,that asks the question,why are people not on the forums?For me the answer is this forum.I, for one am tired of being ignored on decent forums and acknowledged as a ignorant twit because I am a christian.The majority of us as christians can read,we are educated,and can sure think for ourselves.So why the purpose for these kinds of forums???EXACTLY!Have fun.
trish123: Thanks Dru - there really is so much to see and learn isnt there if we dont limit our perceptual abilities...........
I love history - theres a theory that its told by the victors and I dont doubt thats true - but its also an ongoing event - the losers now will be later to win - cos the times they are a changin.............
Absolutely...I prefer truth to "fairy tales" (as Al put it), but many Christians don't want to hear the truth. I'm not bashing them, but stating a fact. I've had many conversations with Christians, and if you suggest that their book is anything less than truth, they get mad...most, anyway.
But yes, the times they are a changin'...and more people are becoming aware of the lies that they've been fed.
My beliefs are based more on what I feel to be true, and what science is now proving to be true, about existence and the energy of this existence. The Kaballah fits more to what I follow, and science is finally proving much of it to be true.
Funny, but I always questioned the bible...and believe me, the nuns and priests hated that, as did my dad.
CrosstownTraffic: Now the way you lot are talking, I am starting to get worried!............... Does this mean "Raiders of the Lost Ark" was made up too??
depends - if you can accept fantasy as true then its a true fantasy - conversely, if you see fantasy as a way to run a government or bring up children then.............. nah - I dont think so..........
littlewolf: There is a forum on ,that asks the question,why are people not on the forums?For me the answer is this forum.I, for one am tired of being ignored on decent forums and acknowledged as a ignorant twit because I am a christian.The majority of us as christians can read,we are educated,and can sure think for ourselves.So why the purpose for these kinds of forums???EXACTLY!Have fun.
littlewolf: There is a forum on ,that asks the question,why are people not on the forums?For me the answer is this forum.I, for one am tired of being ignored on decent forums and acknowledged as a ignorant twit because I am a christian.The majority of us as christians can read,we are educated,and can sure think for ourselves.So why the purpose for these kinds of forums???EXACTLY!Have fun.
Oh I am having fun thanks - sorry that bothers you so much..........
littlewolf: There is a forum on ,that asks the question,why are people not on the forums?For me the answer is this forum.I, for one am tired of being ignored on decent forums and acknowledged as a ignorant twit because I am a christian.The majority of us as christians can read,we are educated,and can sure think for ourselves.So why the purpose for these kinds of forums???EXACTLY!Have fun.
Read history, educate yourself further, might help with your feelings of being acknowledged as an ignorant twit.
Josephus was more remarkable by the stuff he didnt record - Bethlehem for one thing - but recently I was looking at the tale of the Holy Innocents, the babies who Herod supposedly had killed - although Josephus was accurate in many areas, he was remarkably remiss on the life of Jesus and the incident of the Holy Innocents too...... as were other contemporary historians.......
Well Josephus was Jewish General before he became Roman. He knew war, he knew negotiating, and he surely knew where the money and opulence was. Coercsion is possible but me thinks an army general in a position to negotiate has no illusions about being coerced.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects: Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus (Historia Ecclesiastica, Eusebius, c. 325). Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them.
To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god.
A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities became one God. Following longstanding heathen custom, Constantine used the official gathering and the Roman apotheosis decree to legally deify two deities as one, and did so by democratic consent.
A new god was proclaimed and "officially" ratified by Constantine (Acta Concilii Nicaeni, 1618). That purely political act of deification effectively and legally placed Hesus and Krishna among the Roman gods as one individual composite.
That abstraction lent Earthly existence to amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new religion.
How the Gospels were created
Constantine then instructed Eusebius to organise the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the council. His instructions were:
"Search ye these books, and whatever is good in them, that retain; but whatsoever is evil, that cast away. What is good in one book, unite ye with that which is good in another book. And whatsoever is thus brought together shall be called The Book of Books. And it shall be the doctrine of my people, which I will recommend unto all nations, that there shall be no more war for religions' sake." (God's Book of Eskra, op. cit., chapter xlviii, paragraph 31)
"Make them to astonish" said Constantine, and "the books were written accordingly" (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, pp. 36-39).
Eusebius amalgamated the "legendary tales of all the religious doctrines of the world together as one", using the standard god-myths from the presbyters' manuscripts as his exemplars.
Merging the supernatural "god" stories of Mithra and Krishna with British Culdean beliefs effectively joined the orations of Eastern and Western presbyters together "to form a new universal belief" (ibid.). Constantine believed that the amalgamated collection of myths would unite variant and opposing religious factions under one representative story.
Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce "fifty sumptuous copies ... to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art" (ibid.). "These orders," said Eusebius, "were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself ... we sent him magnificently and elaborately bound volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms" (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p. 36). They were the "New Testimonies", and this is the first mention (c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record.