These days when many people are marrying older than before, and as a consequence have acquired assets, I would say a resounding yes from a financial point of view.
Many young women, my daughter included, have great jobs, their own houses and cars etc. They should protect what they´ve worked so damn hard for.
I realise it´s not the romantic stance, but nowadays, and with the experience we´ve all either learned personally or know of, we must be realistic.
But when a guy mentions Pre-nuptual agreement - he's labled a jerk ........but It's alright for a lady to protect her holdings and earnings ?
In my opinion, a pre-nuptial agreement is basically like you're saying that you don't trust the other person and you need to cover yourself before getting married. Kinda disappointing to think about. I'm not a fan of pre-nuptial at all haha :-/
delmervin1: SHOULD MARRIAGE BASE ON CONTRACT BASES IN A SITUATION WHEREBY HE/SHE IS MISBEHAVING ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS JUST WAIT ONTIL THE CONTRACT EXPIRE... AFTER THE POLES I HAVE A STORY TO TELL BELIEVE ME YOU ARE GOING TO LAUGH... BUT AFTER THE POLES.
The problem is that most attractions start out by both looking through the famous beer goggles. Never gone to bed with an ugly women, woke up next to few though
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
hereally isnt the done thing here.it