I beg your pardon to differ. But what I said is true because I experienced it. I don't know the basis of your assertion as you didn't mention it. If its merely your belief, then there is no use of a discourse. One is entitled to one's belief, rational or irrational.
You know "Hookah"..if you don't...must be knowing "hubble-bubble"..so there is one person in our village who makes mess of hookah in just one breath and so he is called "hookapad"...pad=one who has a big appetite. But he is tolerated because he has excellent sense of humor.
It is incredible. Love can be false and true? A normal inborn emotion is too rudimentary to be called love. It lacks direction. It is self-oriented and, therefore, is prejudiced. It being novice and so all religions are playing with it, Christianity in particular. Could you then please enlighten, 'what is false love?
I would like to cite an extract from Mahabharat....an amazing character Karna detailing his issues to go to the war. Karna says:
"My friend, you are fighting this war for the throne. Arjuna is fighting for Dharma, for Indrapratha, for Panchali. But what am I fighting for? I am fighting for my glory. Yes, we are participating in the same war but the reasons are different. I will not gain or lose anything, no matter which side wins. But I am not ready to lose my glory, I will not let history point fingers towards me saying that I was a “Coward”. Hastinapur’s throne is important to you, I am aware of that. But my friend, learn to respect the reason and cause of your peers. We are all fighting our own wars and I am the loneliest warrior here after Bheesma, fighting for nothing.”
Phyllis I , by virtue of my disposition, don't follow any "osho" inclusive. I take him to be a guide, more friendly than a Guru. I mean 'osho' can well be a handicap if I cling.
Yes, of course. At the most it can be the working, mind it, just working status quo can be maintained. And they claim the success on this behalf. "No friction" proposition can't be the evidence of love. Love is dynamic not static.
Phyllis I can't pretend to agree. Allow me to make use of a metaphor. Butter is not the outcome of the consistency of milk. It has to undergo a process.
I have had the experience of this precarious situation of flawed partners. And as you have pointed, there was all that drama..poking our minds and hurting our hearts..It persisted for 1-4 years...display of mutual hostility...then an idea struck my mind...if I retreat. And I actually did, leaving the ground for the single player. Now she came with an interesting complaint, why don't you fight with me? The episode was over.
Hans Let me translate your intelligence. It is pseudo, misdirected and a show business. And I personally know the source of your reaction. The lady told me the whole story but I can't publicize her name because of the decorum.
Niyana Liking or not..is others' prerogative. Your post posed a question and I honestly answered. Yep I do know some mediocre minds would come with fantastic reactions. And I am also aware of the fact that some timid persons can use the foul language as well.
Niayana I am sorry Niyana, please check for it. Your question has a basic infirmity. Increment and decrement can be measured by way of a specified measuring reference. Increased or decreased, in comparison to what?
RE: What Is This Thing??!!
I beg your pardon to differ. But what I said is true because I experienced it. I don't know the basis of your assertion as you didn't mention it. If its merely your belief, then there is no use of a discourse. One is entitled to one's belief, rational or irrational.