Well Tan You are right but I intended to drag you out of the past which is dead. Whatever we do we can't revive it. So better we invest our energy and time to do what we can in the present and for the future for that matter. Anyways thanks for responding.
Though I am not sure about the percentage of truth in it ~~~~~~ The journalists targeted were the ones who were asking government the tough questions and also this figured in the Koregaon case...only an authentic investigation can reveal the truth.
As I told you in my previous comment that I like your blog post... its worth clarifying that why do I? Well it's because of your honesty and then your boldness, which usually people avoid to discuss the personal matters with practicality and neutrality.
About your blog subject... question doesn't arise. @What do you think? In my opinion, her apology was genuine mixed with some regret that she should have done it earlier. I liked your blog post. Thank you.
Jim You miser hahaha You were interested in the history but you forgot to thank even after asking...I included you in the class of smart Americans... didn't I?
I feel good to learn that you have a pleasant weather but astonished to see that smart Americans resorted to the English ways...mind you I complemented and so don't shy to thank me
You disappoint me somewhat, with your comment (above) - I thought you were more philosophically deep than that.....
I have some no small respect for your intellect. You can reason well, and are good at chess.....
I know you can do better than that, mate. What are your views on reincarnation? I feel it may be possible; however, I doubt it involves any God in that (if true) no further God is required, or (indeed) involved.... ~~~~~~~ Sorry I didn't mean to disappoint you. I appreciated her comment on its merits. She simply asked that the topic under the discussion was "existence or non existence of something (God or god)". So first we have to understand what that "something" is? I still hold that this is a genuine approach. God may be a belief, perception, figment of imagination, a concept or whatever. So even if we discard something, we need to know what that something is. Thank you for your compliments. I value it. I join you if you start from the base and we proceed systematically.
@The first reasonable step is to define the premiss of your argument: what is 'god'? ~~~~ You nailed it. ~~~~~~~~~ Show starts here. I love you because you address the core in a simple and balanced way.
I am also scared but because of other reasons. My worry is the assembly election results, if BJP manages to win West Bengal, it can be fatal for the political and economic health of India. The only hope is that Bengal has been the most advanced province culturally and so can't easily fall a prey to the predators.
I understand what you say. But I beg to differ. Actually some years back I had the same impression as yours. I would like to caution you, it's not the case. Please don't translate some fringed experience into general behaviour. I agree you directly suffer, but could you believe that there are many who suffer indirectly. Who knows what is the #doctrineoflife?
Great piece of writing, appreciated. Now commenting on your subject, yes you are weak as everybody shall be in the given situation. There is a rule, either be the part of a crowd of the majority, or stay at one of the two extremes. You can choose to be an unstable free radical or a stable successful person. Choice is all and always yours.
I respect your beliefs. smile ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beliefs? I strongly protests, you are taking my experiences to be beliefs. You are liable to face a defamation suit. Hahahaha I admit it was a journey postponed in the midway...and so can't be claimed to be the final truth and so you can call it beliefs.
@Aruena Fear of death is the ultimate insecurity. And that plays a pivotal role in the genesis of a savior or God. Now, that savior or God becomes a commercial for the religion. But then reaching at a relatively higher psychological stage, human beings inherits a quest of knowledge by questioning and reasoning. So science is the best tool of learning. But the approach is objective. It observes outside. Spiritualism is again the science but with a subjective approach. Reality is meaningless in want of an observer. So, to be spiritual you have to be an observer without involvement. Just my thoughts... self-righteousness not even intended.
The idea itself is absurd. Its equal to controlling the other person if you expect the conditioning of someone's natural disposition. Cutting the story short, never if asked for. But yes when living with a person I notice that the other person feels uncomfortable with something, with my habits, behaviour or actions, I would like to improvise for sure. Especially about my passion, passion is a passion, the second beloved. Not a thing to be negotiable, no way, nothing doing.
Correct notation is 3. axb6...not pxb6, which is a wrong. Note: A pawn move notation is by way of mentioning the destination square and if its a capture then by the name of column which that pawn placed in into(x) the destination square. So in the above example if it was the simple movement of the pawn than a capture, then the move would have been 3. b6.
iotaoo Blog Comments (1,258)
what I am missing here?
RE: IRONY
Well TanYou are right but I intended to drag you out of the past which is dead. Whatever we do we can't revive it.
So better we invest our energy and time to do what we can in the present and for the future for that matter.
Anyways thanks for responding.