For my part, my only slight issue is with the language, NOT the sentiment. The reasoning for it I get: It's basically cultural Marxism: Change the language, to change behaviour and eventually society. It's a good thing. People should be who they are. of course!!, BUT how much does everyone else need to participate in your self image?, especially under 13. Is it appropriate to substitute the two gender biological reality for an amorphous mess of definitions that it's up to the individual to come up with. Maybe it is I dunno . Again, speaking purely from the point of view of pronouns, languages move towards simplicity over time, and these new words could easily just be replaced by 'they'. In the context in which it's used, it doesn't need to imply a plurality.
Ultimately anyone who worries about the right term to use or the right box to put someone in to respect their identity is a kind tolerant person, but our obsession with being PC at all times is excessive.
If I were a trans girl, I wouldn't give a hoot if someone referred to me as a he but rather how he treated me a person.
German shepherds are friggin awesome for sure. I've never came across a creature (human or otherwise) with a capacity for love like our childhood dog Ben (Alsation) and probably never will.
It's so crazy that an amazing actor like Bryan Cranston was once on the power rangers. And yep for lots of men who are comic book inclined (exhibit a: me), any sort of cosplay costume is super super haute. Probably a generational thing.
Biff i do believe in a lifelong commitment to one person (preferably Emma Stone), but I don't think a guy in a dress needs to be involved in proceedings.
Well one of the few things I won't do online is read a book with a kindle. Call me old school but I still like turning an actual page (but if I can get the audiobook I will, so I can trick myself into getting some gentle exercise as I listen).
notadoctor Blog Comments (178)
x 50.
RE: If you could,.....................................
Ditto. So awful.