You should know better, same as fundamental islamists full of hatred call to kill who "profanes" their faith some other ignorant call antisemitic any idea that's opposed to their one sided narrow views, at the end they don't even know what's the meaning of SEMITIC and they are so sure that the said name refers only to one specific ethnic group, so sad
Not quite! Is not as simple as jumping from the Otomans to the Romans
3'rd millennium BC : The Canaanites were the earliest known inhabitants of Palestine. They became urbanized and lived in city-states, one of which was Jericho . They developed an alphabet. Palestine's location at the center of routes linking three continents made it the meeting place for religious and cultural influences from Egypt, Syria, Mesopotamia, and Asia Minor. It was also the natural battleground for the great powers of the region and subject to domination by adjacent empires, beginning with Egypt in the 3d millennium BC.
2'rd millennium BC : Egyptian hegemony and Canaanite autonomy were constantly challenged by such ethnically diverse invaders as the Amorites, Hittites, and Hurrians. These invaders, however, were defeated by the Egyptians and absorbed by the Canaanites, who at that time may have numbered about 200000.
14th century BC : Egyptian power began to weaken, new invaders appeared: the Hebrews, a group of Semitic tribes from Mesopotamia, and the Philistines (after whom the country was later named), an Aegean people of Indo-European stock.
1230 BC : Joshua conquered parts of Palestine. The conquerors settled in the hill country, but they were unable to conquer all of Palestine.
Is not as simple as jumping from the Otomans to the Romans
Res 181 was rejected by the only people who would be affected by the forced creation of a state, such decision should have been discussed with the arabs more than with any others, now the Palestinians want to push for their recognition and even if they get more votes than irsrael the Palestinian nation won't come true, seems like human rights are just for a small group.
I'll ask you this, if they told you there will be a new super highway built in your city with 12 lanes and mono rail and train tracks I bet you'd support it, but if they tell you it will pass right over your house then you'd have second thoughts.
Allowing trafficking is not the point, what I say is that if the volunteer sale by the donor were allowed for sure the trafficking would disappear because it would be a living person selling his own organs who would get the money and not the middleman.
I've just read in the news that organs trafficking accounts for 10% of transplants globally, it mentions that kidneys are in higher demand and people in some countries offer their kidneys and other organs for sale due to poverty. Law in most countries prohibit the sale of organs this makes this people who are willing to sell theirs go to the black market where middlemen make up to 10 times more than the donor, this makes me wonder, why can't a person profit from his own organs? I mean, by law it's ok if the organ is taken from a dead person and transplanted to someone who needs it, with this practice the recipient of the organ recover his health, the doctors and hospitals charge handsome money for the surgery and even the funerary makes a profit when disposing the body, means everybody wins except the organ donor. Shouldn't be ok then allow a person if he wants to sell their organs for a profit, at least in that way he could also enjoy the benefits of the transaction.
I already paid cuz the ISP was about to pass the case to the legal department, I wish I could get my money back, there's no way to make him pay and the company is very clear about expense payment, I guess at the end this serve as a lesson for me
I checked this one long time ago. The phrase is supposed to have originated in England in the 17th century when city streets were filthy and heavy rain would occasionally carry along dead animals.
The idea that seeing dead cats and dogs floating by in storms would cause people to coin this phrase is just about believable. People may not have actually thought the animals had come from the sky, but might have made up the phrase to suit the occasion.
I would like to have your opinion on this for I have a frozen mental lapse (is that right?)
Ok, the point is a year ago a new colleague joined my company, after arrival he was feeling bad cuz he came alone and wanted to stay in touch with his wife, he couldn't sign for an internet service because internet providers only make contracts for residents or nationals, so I lent him my civil ID to get a contract, the point is that he resigned after 3 months and left the country overnight, last week i received a notification from the internet company demanding late payment and cancellation fees for about 165 US$, I sent him an email and his answer was that he's very sorry about that and that I should request the money from our employer, our company doesn't honor expenses after 90 days and all this is a debt almost one year old. Honestly, shouldn't he pay for this?
cherrygc Forum Posts (487)
the way you stalk me
RE: Would you date your ex ?
You are right!