If you think about it nature gifted men with intelligence to make us better at hunting and setting traps for animals etc. And this translates into today's scientists and engineers.
But what the hell did nature make women smart for?
Did she need those extra brains to raise kids and cook? No. Her smarts are wordy and political, they're not there to put a man on the moon, they are there to control the tribe.
One way around it is to only date thick chicks. Simple people tend not to have a giant gap between true nature and self-image and this is one reason why men don't place as much importance on the smarts of a woman. What you see is what you get and men care more about what they see.
But north of IQ 110 and women become a Machiavellian cauldron of cunning and self-image. The gulf between true nature and self-image is the greatest in the intelligent woman.
Always remember that you're appealing to two fiercely different personalities in one body - who she is and what she seems. True nature versus self-image.
And just as surely as any woman attacks and tests a man's self-image to get at what's really driving him, a man must do the same back to her. When you tell a woman you have a master's degree, or when you tell her you love her after 5 minutes(seemingly believing this will get things off to a flying start), this is all self-image. It's obvious you're trying to deceive, and it's not the deception itself which is unattractive, but the fact that you don't feel good enough as you are. You don't feel comfortable enough to "be yourself".
Purge from your mind anything which makes you feel like you need the woman. Pretend to yourself that your aim isn't getting out of India. You don't need anything from her and there is no plan.
To attract women everything needs to happen by accident and simultaneously everything must happen for a reason. On the surface the man she loves is blase and cocksure, yet there are admirable hidden depths beneath the cocky git(or so she tells herself).
God forbid you ever experience anything that traumatising, but PTSD is the best thing in the world for the first 6 months after the event. It'll keep you alive and it'll keep you focused. You won't kill yourself or get yourself killed thanks to acute PTSD.
The problem is chronic PTSD: The world of constant torment where you see yourself as a "survivor" just for surviving the demons in your own head. Demons which should have been silenced long ago if only you had the perspective on life.
And this is what's driving the mental breakdown - the sense of being underappreciated and meaningless.
For example in Israel where they have a very strong sense of tribal, national and communal identity and purpose PTSD seldom becomes chronic in the individual. Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder which is an adaptive tool of survival in its acute stage to create a heightened sense of alertness which protects against threats does not easily develop into the problematic chronic stage of PTSD amongst the Israelis. The reason for this is because the people of Israel have an overarching sense of collective meaning and purpose which all individuals can buy into. Israel isn't liberal in the individualistic sense and that's why they have stronger bonds and higher levels of mental resolve.
At least for the majority of people(the working class)the woman is paid to do in industry by her liberating employer what she did out of compassion for the chains of her loving family. And then she goes home and does the double shift. Cleans, cooks and talks by day for work and cleans, cooks and talks in the evening for family. Women's lib is like the primary school teacher telling a class of infants to make drawings out of stencils and glitter - making drawings out of stencils and glitter is what they would have done if the teacher wasn't even in the room!
The male equivalent of her is the Pedro no shifts. The total collapse of manhood's morale and sense of meaning in the world.
Back to the theme of average... In the olden days beta males were tougher and alpha males were more civilised. No beta was as embarrassing as the modern beta and no traditional alpha was as indifferent as the modern alpha, where the typical greatest generation man was 3 parts beta to 2 parts alpha the boomer male is perhaps 4 parts beta to 1 part alpha(with a small minority of super alpha rock stars and Simon Cowells hoarding it all).
I believe that in the coming years historians and philosophers will talk about what little impact women's liberation had on the nature of woman and yet strangely it has driven the world of men to extremes.
The problem with the alpha male is his ability to be basically fine after enduring the most humiliating day of his life. He's incorrigible. He's not against criticism(like a woman)so much as he is above criticism. He doesn't care enough about what you say(even if you're a respected individual or body)to try and stop you from saying it and that's the difference between the alpha male and the woman.
Even alpha women. Now arrogant men aren't good at taking advice or criticism but what they don't do is attempt to destroy the very concept of good advice and all the knowledge and good sense which leads to it. If a real man scores low on an IQ test he doesn't become an enemy of IQ tests everywhere or heartily insist that IQ tests are an inadequate measure of intelligence.
Now that is really about whether you'll take good advice as good advice or whether you'll take it as a personal criticism. In a feminine society where women rule good advice will be taken as personal criticism and all attempts to improve humanity and the world are thwarted by the easily butthurt self-consciousness of womankind.
The only argument you could make against that could be used against all good health advice. If you made BMI about ideal health then even more would people would show up as overweight on their BMI, which would make people self-conscious which leads to stress which leads to illness.
Showing people the best way could remind people of their inferior ways, and instead of this spurring them on to do better, they simply feel bad about themselves and get sick thereby.
Scandalous for it to shift around like this as surely the best BMI is the one which makes your organs fail at the latest possible date. That which keeps you living longer and this doesn't change when the people around you put on weight.
I doubt we'd send the tanks in until Islam interferes with the penthouse class. Before this time we have chavs, football fans, and an entire range of head the balls waiting in the wings. Before the army we have the people's army and the righteous fury of the common man.
The important thing is to never lose yourself to this unreal life. Never lie, bully, clique or do anything which is investing too much emotion and importance into the online void, it is a bottomless pit of egotism from which there is no return. You have to limit your exposure to Connecting Singles. Stare into the abyss for long and the abyss stares into you.
Facebook is too close to home, the people are not strangers. Other forums are faceless and you don't get the time to watch how people behave over any duration, the turnover is too great.
CS is good because it most closely mimics a real life social circle but remains not real life. And what strikes me about CS is how much it is like a playtime food fight. And it's an education. I may give out the impression that I'm not interested in the people here, but I am. To understand the infantilised world it's best to ingratiate yourself with the juvenile. And I can't hang around 10 year olds, I'd get arrested, but I can effectively do that here.
Therapeutic ranting meets sociological study. Not like a worm in a science beaker, nicer. I'm studying the lying liars, the pettiest bullies, and the twattiest cliques with an interest to see human nature unmasked. How degenerate can people become when not policed by reality? That is the question and I look to CS for the answer.
So I'm a pessimist for not supporting Trump? Or is it just that my grasp of reality is firmer than a dying man's handshake?
I'll say something positive about the Trumpenkrieg. Trump's supporters are using their three-fingered fists to make banners instead of drunkenly beating their kids into a coma, that is a positive. You can build on that. There has also been a marked reduction in the number of people shopping in their pyjamas whenever Trump is making a speech; you can build on this, too. Who says I'm all negativity?
The contention is that if you bring people closer to political power they'll become more politically engaged(and competent).
The tyranny of the judiciary and the misfit mafia of political correctness can be combated by getting your average Joe to take an interest. You get him to take an interest by making politics tangible so he can directly feel the consequences of his decisions. Brussels is too far removed from the ordinary person to achieve this.
And then there's all the immigrants here because of the EU. You don't have to be politically engaged to notice them.
TheRedSquirrel87 Forum Posts (1,107)
RE: failure.
If you think about it nature gifted men with intelligence to make us better at hunting and setting traps for animals etc. And this translates into today's scientists and engineers.But what the hell did nature make women smart for?
Did she need those extra brains to raise kids and cook? No. Her smarts are wordy and political, they're not there to put a man on the moon, they are there to control the tribe.