Anarchists and autocrats are not so different - they share an inability to observe and respect the boundaries of the other seeing this as a resriction of their own freedom - and chaos leads to dictatorship.
He stopped himself from mocking that cripple just a moment too late, didn't he?
You could almost accept give him the benefit of the doubt if that wasn't exactly the same sense of humour as what he said on that bus that time about women Not that it's the end of the world. I did impressions like that when I was young, but then I also pushed a disabled lad to school everyday for near enough 10 years.
I could say a few things but I work with what you give me which isn't a lot although I believe some really are as one-dimensional as they appear online. I can't take you out for a beer, get to know you, and have a real conversation which matters and this is why no one here ever convinces anyone of anything they didn't already think. At best this is a place to be narcissistic without hurting anyone and at worst it's a circle jerk or playtime food fight.
The people who purport to care about nature and the animal kingdom tend to support the standardisation of humanity into consumers and carbon footprints. We encourage business to go where it cannot be supervised and balloon the populations of the greediest consumers. The boomer generation when it "grew up" shifted production globally to be as dirty as possible and put consumption on steroids, they became the antithesis of good for the earth and so recycling your old tin cans will not sort everything out. That's just self-conscious virtue signalling from a generation of scavengers. All is vanity.
At least that fits the pattern of the trendsetting developed world.
The backward people who received industrial democracy as a gift don't fit the same cycle. The developing world having an advanced stage of development literally transplanted onto its surface changes everything natural. Your personalities won't shine through as all is overwhelmed by this rush to graft the foreign onto yourselves. The developing world will have no natural flow or development as all(many)follow the overwhelming need to copy the character and creations of the white man.
They'll always be imitating some impression they have of us - and this is bad for us too because it feeds the narcissism of the white race - until such time that they culturally evolve to match what they can do materially, lose their inferiority complex, and begin asserting who they really are(like China now does and tackered lackey Mexico doesn't).
If today we're entering a period of group rights and national interests - leaving the boomer era of self license and self-celebration behind - we'd spend the next 30 years gradually comprosmising and softening the nationalist approach. The era after would probably the equivalent of Sanders turns. Liberals, patriots, greats; decadents, defenders, re-builders. Today we're moving from the liberal state of decadence to the patriotic stage of defence.
In theory America is the most sovereign nation in the world being the only country that isn't controlled by the way other countries vote. If America votes for the right the western world goes to the right, it doesn't matter whether Britain's "ruled" by a left-wing government we still, in the whole, go to the right. Even outside the EU Britain has a sovereignty score of maybe 30% where America could be as much as 70%.
In addition to this we're mid-crisis in the heart of the recurring 10 year period in politics which determines how the next 30 or so years will be. Society acts decisively for a moment and then autopilots for ages. Now is the hour of decision.
South Africa has effectively fallen into despair already and I wonder what the order of white world implosion will be. America, Canada and then Australia would be my bet. I also wonder whether or not we'll accept the flighting refugees in the way we accept white South Africans filling up Ireland etc.
The USA is cursed by being built on an Indian burial ground and Ayers Rock is hollow and filled with the bones of Aborigines. In Europe we'll always have a legitimacy which others do not. A race cannot last long without its own soil, we'll outlive both white America and Australia.
Loving to hate the guy got him elected and being a player is fine in opposition when all you're needed for is talk. But he's a somebody now who needs to put food on the table and head the family. We need to see more dad, less cad.
I do feel Trump has doubled the size of these protests through tweeting alone. Imo If Trump believed in what he was saying then his mission would override his love of petty power and he wouldn't get so involved in this goading and squabbling. Small and twatty, to me it says here is a man with no vision.
Many of those against him have so much ambition bound up in diversity that they fail to see the heart of the problem. In addition many of these people are inherent enemies of the nation which stand to lose even if Trump does really well. You can't please everyone.
And then there's another group of people - the largest group of people - who Trump simply makes nervous. And this includes a lot of people who were Trump long before Trump, even before 2008. Fresh converts seem to be the most in awe of him.
A happy medium between the even couple and the odd couple. Enough commonality between you to keep things tranquil and trusting(i.e. real love)and enough diversity to keep it conflicting and chaotic(i.e. thrills). The best couple is the uneven couple.
Novelty keeps the dream alive for 10 weeks and it's about 6 months until we discover who each other really are. Normally this will kill the relationship stone dead. Not that it matters, you have to kill a dream to follow a dream.
Although 100 years ago when the free trade bourgeoisie with planetary ambitions sent the western working class off for a mass cull at the Somme we obeyed. A century ago we consented to our own suicide yet we're a different people today to our ancestors and this isn't always a bad thing.
It's a fairly simple choice between developing the third world or sustaining our world. Their gain is our loss unfortunately and the liberal bourgeoisie want western workers to collectively suicide so they can give our rations to Africa. That's basically how it is.
Basically you're endorsing by vote this person you know very little about as sound genetic stock. The story is one of eugenics stripped-down for a populist century.
Pessimism about technology is itself a sign of being spoilt even tho it's a valid observation that it is spoling everyone. Technology was more or less a 100% gift to those who fought the wars of the past and those today living in the developing world(partly because they put it to better use and know what hunger feels liks). The weird irony about technology is that the more dependent on it you are the less appreciative of it you become.
RE: LAWS vs. CITIZENS.
Anarchists and autocrats are not so different - they share an inability to observe and respect the boundaries of the other seeing this as a resriction of their own freedom - and chaos leads to dictatorship.