They should rename the band... STONE AGE! My god... why pay for this... just go down to senior citzen hang out and play and old Stones song and watch grandma and grampa get down and do the boogie woogie blues.... now that is real life entertainment...
If you're talking about the entire collection of their musical works I'd have to say the Beatles hands down. Especially if that includes what they all did individually in the later years. Although they did some pretty good stuff in the early years too.
I think the Stones were better for showmanship, and pushing things to the edge, while the Beatles had more philosophical depth to their lyrics.
If I was stranded on an island and I could only choose the complete works of either of these groups it would have to be the Beatles. I think the Stones would become boring after a while, whereas the Beatles had a wider range of music. I imagine they had a much larger collection of music too over the years. Not real sure about that, but I would be surprised if I'm wrong. The Beatles wrote a LOT of stuff.
Well yeah as well as music goes the Beatles...but as regards decadent lifestyles in the Caribbean and stuff STONES...Go Keef ya jet skiing palm treeing Phool.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).