Rolling Stones or the Beatles? ( Archived) (42)

Sep 13, 2006 10:44 PM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
Me, personally, I'd say it's a tie. However, the Stones have lasted longer.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 13, 2006 11:18 PM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
sweet_heart7019
sweet_heart7019sweet_heart7019East Valley, Arizona USA19 Posts
That is tough, but I'd say the Beatles.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 13, 2006 11:19 PM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
Tough break for the Suns; why'd Staudemire have to be injured.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 13, 2006 11:20 PM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
Definitel the Beatles. But I saw the Stones in '74 at the Memphis Coliseum..what a trip that was!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 12:01 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
jasflint
jasflintjasflintcollins, Georgia USA50 Threads 1,085 Posts
Keef forever, but John should have replaced mikey a long time ago....Mick is cool, but not a Stone.wave
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 12:02 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
mastic55
mastic55mastic55Long Island, New York USA167 Threads 6,859 Posts
I like the beatles,but that's like asking Jesus or Budda,lol
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 12:05 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
solowolf
solowolfsolowolfoklahoma city, Oklahoma USA32 Threads 969 Posts
Stones
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 12:13 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
DangerouslySweet
DangerouslySweetDangerouslySweetNorthwestern, Arizona USA12 Threads 764 Posts
Stones.....definitely. grin
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 12:13 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
Beatles
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 7:50 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
optimystic
optimysticoptimysticIn, Washington USA10 Threads 327 Posts
Beatles hands down. When the Stones came to town I ended up with 8 tickets to the show in my dresser drawer the next day, that had been given to me by people who just wouldn't believe that I didn't even want to go to the concert.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 7:51 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
photofreek
photofreekphotofreeksoda springs, USA23 Threads 2,495 Posts
The Bloody Beatles of course
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 7:53 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
highplains
highplainshighplainsHighland Springs, Virginia USA127 Threads 4,288 Posts
Rolling Stones.....Timelesshead banger
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 7:53 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
TexasTornado
TexasTornadoTexasTornadofairfield, USA22 Threads 2,701 Posts
cant choose..give me both..
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 7:53 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
native_grl38
native_grl38native_grl38Belleville, Canada10 Threads 4,332 Posts
I like the stones hands down!!!!!!


applause applause grin


I have an uncle that is a HUGE beatles fanatic and has every album and piece of beatles nostalgia ever made I think!!!!!!grin
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 7:55 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
Tumpa
TumpaTumpaottawa, Ontario Canada88 Threads 7,091 Posts
Listen. The Stones are only still here because they have to do their time. After all, they wrote "sympathy for the devil".....
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 7:55 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
izzyva
izzyvaizzyvaHighland Springs, Virginia USA7 Threads 2,070 Posts
Stones



El diablo
devil
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 8:07 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
jimbhoy
jimbhoyjimbhoyHamilton, Strathclyde, Scotland UK80 Threads 2 Polls 4,142 Posts
The stones, I think the beatles were just an overated boy band of the 60's in thier early years, as they were told what to do,what to wear etc etc, but they wrote some great stuff at the end up
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 8:14 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
optimystic
optimysticoptimysticIn, Washington USA10 Threads 327 Posts
If anyone saw their last televised performance...kinda obvious the Stones just don't "have it" anymore. Basically made fools of themselves.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 8:19 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
Tumpa
TumpaTumpaottawa, Ontario Canada88 Threads 7,091 Posts
Like I said...sympathy for the devil...

Or was it...love, love, love? All you need is love....
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 14, 2006 8:58 AM CST Rolling Stones or the Beatles?
Rightman4You
Rightman4YouRightman4YouStevensville, Michigan USA1 Threads 8 Posts
Da Stones stayed together longer...
but they had very little talent compare to Beatles... Find a what works, then let Mic sing it over and over and over.... As a Old Beatle Fan.... Let it Be.... Let it Be... Speaking words of wisdom Let it Be!..... Beatles are the Greatest Band of All time... How can anyone even touch the writing and creative skills of Paul or John... touch act to follow... even Wings with Paul could only mirror what they had already done in the past....

Leave you all with this famous tune...

Yesterday..... all my troubles seem so far away,
now it looks as though here here to stay
Oh I believe in Yesterday!

Enjoy... Those Beatle tune will out live all of us....

dancing dancing dancing
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Stats for this Thread

2,502 Views
41 Comments
by Brad251316 (44 Threads)
Created: Sep 2006
Last Viewed: Apr 28
Last Commented: Oct 2006

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here