Indigo_Flow: Its not in the quran but its in the hadith, since mohammed was impressed at the way a jew was put to death by stoning and decided to adopt it.
but i have questions.
-Why does the quran order the killing of unbelievers when a person has their whole life to accept god? Why doesn’t the quran concentrate on the conversion of these people?
-Why didn’t god send a replacement to that dinner when mohammed ate poison, or why didn’t He cause someone else to take the first bite and warn mohammed not to eat?
-Why did God watch mohammed die slowly and painfully before his message was put into a book?
-How can god be “Merciful & Compassionate” and command the most merciless punishment on those who disbelieve?
-If god can do everything, why did He need gabriel?
-Why did god send his message to an illiterate man?
and if islam is supposed to be a religion of "peace" please explain quran 9:5, 9:112, 8:39, 8:65, 9:38, 47:4 thanks
here is the surah 9:5
it is all about interpretation, or rather misinterpretation, just as has been done to the bible by the different christian sects topics such as convert or die, killing of infidels, women and islam etc are often misused to create fear
it is all about interpretation, or rather misinterpretation, just as has been done to the bible by the different christian sects topics such as convert or die, killing of infidels, women and islam etc are often misused to create fear
The first Holocaust against Muslims was carried out by the crusaders. On Friday, July 15, 1099 the crusaders captured Jerusalem and murdered thousands of Muslims. More than 70, 000 dead bodies of Muslim children and women were found in the Mosque of Omar in Jerusalem alone.
There have been several other Holocausts and genocides of Muslims;
Ganges Khan and his forces killed more than a million Muslims during the occupation of Iraq and neighboring areas.
Thousands of Muslims were killed / forced to change religion by Spanish Crusaders in South America
More than a million Muslims were killed / displaced by Spanish and other European extremists during the rebellion against the Ottoman Empire.
More than 3 million Muslims were killed / displaced by the European colonial powers during and after the occupation of Muslim countries after World War I and II.
More than 5 million Muslims were killed / displaced by Tsars of Russia
More than a million Muslims were killed / displaced by Communist Government of Russia
More than 1.5 million Muslims have been killed in China, Cambodia, Vietnam, and other Far East countries since the world war II
More than half million Muslims have been killed / displaced in Burma since World War II
More than half million Muslims have been killed in India and Kashmir since 1947
More than half million Muslims were killed by Serbs and Croats in Bosnia during early 90s.
More than 100,000 Muslims were killed in Kosovo and Albania during mid 90s.
More than 5 million Muslims have been killed / displaced in Palestine since 1948
More than 5 million Muslims were killed / displaced by the Russian occupation of Afghanistan
Thousands of Muslims have been killed by the secular governments in Muslim countries, backed by the Western Governments, since the independence from the colonial powers.
One million Muslim children died due to malnutrition during UN/US embargo on Iraq in 1990s.
Currently, hundreds of innocent civilians have been killed by the American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan
emmaline: [. . .]One million Muslim children died due to malnutrition during UN/US embargo on Iraq in 1990s.
Assuming that your statistics are accurate, and there's very little doubt that they are, considering the history of propaganda in the region (e.g., Egypt falsely declaring victory in the first day of the Six-Day war with Israel, etc.), I can't let you get away with saying that without pointing out that Sadam Hussain gained weight as those alleged million children allegedly starved, so you can't blame the UN/US embargo. Blame must be placed on the former Iraqi government having little for value the lives of its people. Blame must be placed in the right place on a lot of your other attempts to demonize, too. I somewhat doubt the statistics, as most Muslim deaths throughout history have been at the hands of other Muslims.
Yes, yes... we all know about the Crusades. How long ago was that? I surely wasn't alive, and neither were you, so it's just a history lesson and shouldn't be viewed as a motivation for anything. Nobody living today suffered from the Crusades.
In response to: Ganges Khan and his forces killed more than a million Muslims during the occupation of Iraq and neighboring areas.
Khan killed his own brother, too, so he wasn't just picking on Muslims. The inclusion of this statistic is pointless. Khan killed everyone.
In response to: Thousands of Muslims were killed / forced to change religion by Spanish Crusaders in South America
Ok, are you just making things up? There were no Muslims in South America back then as far as anyone else on earth has recorded history. The Spanish would have kept records of anything like that, too. The native people of South America didn't tell any tales of anyone Islamic ever being there before the men from Spain. Whoever created that history for you is selling you a fiction.
thelastgoodman0: Assuming that your statistics are accurate, and there's very little doubt that they are, considering the history of propaganda in the region (e.g., Egypt falsely declaring victory in the first day of the Six-Day war with Israel, etc.), I can't let you get away with saying that without pointing out that Sadam Hussain gained weight as those alleged million children allegedly starved, so you can't blame the UN/US embargo. Blame must be placed on the former Iraqi government having little for value the lives of its people. Blame must be placed in the right place on a lot of your other attempts to demonize, too. I somewhat doubt the statistics, as most Muslim deaths throughout history have been at the hands of other Muslims.
Yes, yes... we all know about the Crusades. How long ago was that? I surely wasn't alive, and neither were you, so it's just a history lesson and shouldn't be viewed as a motivation for anything. Nobody living today suffered from the Crusades. Khan killed his own brother, too, so he wasn't just picking on Muslims. The inclusion of this statistic is pointless. Khan killed everyone. Ok, are you just making things up? There were no Muslims in South America back then as far as anyone else on earth has recorded history. The Spanish would have kept records of anything like that, too. The native people of South America didn't tell any tales of anyone Islamic ever being there before the men from Spain. Whoever created that history for you is selling you a fiction.
1.ok, so put embargo's in place so that the iraqi people suffer greatly, and they will oust their leader, so we can protect our oil supplies. makes much sense to me, to allow suffering of the citizens, to punish the regime..Estimates of civilian deaths during from the sanctions range from 100,000 to over 1.5 million, most of them children
American war policy architect Douglas J. Feith has argued that the sanctions diminished Iraq militarily, in terms of WMDs, and in its capacity for attacks against its neighbors as its supply lines were cut. In a 2004 Foreign Affairs journal article, the scholars George A. Lopez and David Cortright credit sanctions with: "Compelling Iraq to accept inspections and monitoring; winning concessions from Baghdad on political issue such as the border dispute with Kuwait; preventing the rebuilding of Iraqi defenses after the Persian Gulf War; and blocking the import of vital materials and technologies for producing weapons of mass destruction." Cortright and Lopez argue that "the much-maligned UN-enforced sanctions regime actually ... helped destroy Saddam Hussein's war machine and his capacity to produce weapons." Hussein told his FBI interrogator that Iraq's armaments "had been eliminated by the UN sanctions"
2. i refer to the crusades, due to their being a significant amount of fingerpointing, about which religion is more brutal. but then again, why refer to it, its not valid in the debate, when the core of the debate has been so far, how barbarianistic are some muslims. what i am pointing to here, is the hypocrisy of that thought. all religions have blood on their hands
3. they came with the spaniards, not before, but were nonetheless victims of genocide
Indigo_Flow: Without religion you would have good men doing good things and bad men doing bad things. But for good men to do bad things, that takes religion.
Indigo_Flow: Without religion you would have good men doing good things and bad men doing bad things. But for good men to do bad things, that takes religion.
emmaline: The first Holocaust against Muslims was carried out by the crusaders. On Friday, July 15, 1099 the crusaders captured Jerusalem and murdered thousands of Muslims. More than 70, 000 dead bodies of Muslim children and women were found in the Mosque of Omar in Jerusalem alone.
...don't forget to mention the slaughtered Jews and Christians.
Contrary to populist notions, the Crusaders didn't give a fig about Pope Urban's edict. They went to Outremer for wealth, land and power.
Furthermore, the lands in question once belonged to the Eastern Roman Empire. People seem to think these territories were always Muslim. The Byzantine state spent it's entire existence trying to curb the tide of Islamic expansion. Eight hundred years later it was exhausted and conquered. We can't even comprehend a struggle lasting for that length of time.
The politics of this period are crucial in understanding the Crusades. Leftist historiography tends to omit this point.
Despite the stereotype to the contrary, I've found many Muslim men to be much more respectful of women and faithful to their wives than many Christian men. Of course there are exceptions and this is certainly not true in all cases, but this is a trend I've noticed.
If I was in love with a man who is Muslim (or whatever religion), I would consider 'converting'. My problem is that I do not believe in god, period. Christian god, Muslim Allah, etc. I can't change that fact. But I'd be willing to live the lifestyle of my family, whatever religion they practice.
vcroome: Despite the stereotype to the contrary, I've found many Muslim men to be much more respectful of women and faithful to their wives than many Christian men. Of course there are exceptions and this is certainly not true in all cases, but this is a trend I've noticed.
If I was in love with a man who is Muslim (or whatever religion), I would consider 'converting'. My problem is that I do not believe in god, period. Christian god, Muslim Allah, etc. I can't change that fact. But I'd be willing to live the lifestyle of my family, whatever religion they practice.
Blues63: ...don't forget to mention the slaughtered Jews and Christians.
Contrary to populist notions, the Crusaders didn't give a fig about Pope Urban's edict. They went to Outremer for wealth, land and power.
Furthermore, the lands in question once belonged to the Eastern Roman Empire. People seem to think these territories were always Muslim. The Byzantine state spent it's entire existence trying to curb the tide of Islamic expansion. Eight hundred years later it was exhausted and conquered. We can't even comprehend a struggle lasting for that length of time.
The politics of this period are crucial in understanding the Crusades. Leftist historiography tends to omit this point.
AtwoZ: A recent English survey,made by Swansea University,shows that the converts from Christianity to Islam has increased from 60.000 to 100.000 since 2001.The same survey shows that women make up the greater part of the converts. Of course,the same tendencies can be found throughout the whole Western,Christian sphere.... Now,of course,-people worldwide do convert back&forth,-and that is nothing new....
But if we focus on Christ./Islam,-I´m really surprised and curious for the reason(s).... What are the reason,that so many tend to adapt Islam?
I´m not gonna use the terms Christianity or Islam,-but rather NT and Quran,as they´re the platforms for theses faiths.
What does Quran provide a convert that NT don´t? What makes Mohammed more "attractive" than Jesus? As both faiths are monotheistic,and "having" the "same" God,-why even bother to convert? As the "goal" for both faiths are the same,-a life post mortem,-why convert?
Or is there a simple answer to it,-converting out of secular reasons? It often strikes me,when I talk to converts,that hardly none ever read the Bibble or attended Church while they still where Christians.As a matter of fact,none of ´em where even believerts... But adapting Islam changed them dramatically,-from atheists to believers,-well,at least in public....I recently spoke to a convert,-he was about to become Imam,-and he hardly even knew Pauli.... He has to,-no NT,no Quran.....
Or can it be,that convertations are based on completely different thing´s? For love of a partner,for getting attention,substitution for an empty life?Or out of conveniance,-as Quran is "easier" to understand than NT?Just curious....
Brain intoxication. All over the world. By publicating so widely, you participate. Sorry.
Despite the stereotype to the contrary, I've found many Muslim men to be much more respectful of women and faithful to their wives than many Christian men. Of course there are exceptions and this is certainly not true in all cases, but this is a trend I've noticed.
If I was in love with a man who is Muslim (or whatever religion), I would consider 'converting'. My problem is that I do not believe in god, period. Christian god, Muslim Allah, etc. I can't change that fact. But I'd be willing to live the lifestyle of my family, whatever religion they practice.
good proposals but as you can the reality it's always against the pure good intentions
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
but i have questions.
-Why does the quran order the killing of unbelievers when a person has their whole life to accept god? Why doesn’t the quran concentrate on the conversion of these people?
-Why didn’t god send a replacement to that dinner when mohammed ate poison, or why didn’t He cause someone else to take the first bite and warn mohammed not to eat?
-Why did God watch mohammed die slowly and painfully before his message was put into a book?
-How can god be “Merciful & Compassionate” and command the most merciless punishment on those who disbelieve?
-If god can do everything, why did He need gabriel?
-Why did god send his message to an illiterate man?
and if islam is supposed to be a religion of "peace" please explain quran 9:5, 9:112, 8:39, 8:65, 9:38, 47:4 thanks
here is the surah 9:5
it is all about interpretation, or rather misinterpretation, just as has been done to the bible by the different christian sects
topics such as convert or die, killing of infidels, women and islam etc are often misused to create fear