.............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........ ( Archived) (216)

Jan 7, 2011 5:01 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
emmaline
emmalineemmalineatlanta, Georgia USA6 Threads 1,685 Posts
Indigo_Flow: Its not in the quran but its in the hadith, since mohammed was impressed at the way a jew was put to death by stoning and decided to adopt it.

but i have questions.

-Why does the quran order the killing of unbelievers when a person has their whole life to accept god? Why doesn’t the quran concentrate on the conversion of these people?

-Why didn’t god send a replacement to that dinner when mohammed ate poison, or why didn’t He cause someone else to take the first bite and warn mohammed not to eat?

-Why did God watch mohammed die slowly and painfully before his message was put into a book?

-How can god be “Merciful & Compassionate” and command the most merciless punishment on those who disbelieve?

-If god can do everything, why did He need gabriel?

-Why did god send his message to an illiterate man?

and if islam is supposed to be a religion of "peace" please explain quran 9:5, 9:112, 8:39, 8:65, 9:38, 47:4 thanks


here is the surah 9:5

it is all about interpretation, or rather misinterpretation, just as has been done to the bible by the different christian sects
topics such as convert or die, killing of infidels, women and islam etc are often misused to create fear wine
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 7, 2011 5:02 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
emmaline
emmalineemmalineatlanta, Georgia USA6 Threads 1,685 Posts
emmaline: here is the surah 9:5



it is all about interpretation, or rather misinterpretation, just as has been done to the bible by the different christian sects
topics such as convert or die, killing of infidels, women and islam etc are often misused to create fear
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 7, 2011 5:03 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
emmaline
emmalineemmalineatlanta, Georgia USA6 Threads 1,685 Posts
Indigo_Flow: not even Batman: The Caped Crusader?


that leather blushing
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 7, 2011 5:12 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
emmaline
emmalineemmalineatlanta, Georgia USA6 Threads 1,685 Posts
jlw45: tell that to the palestinians !!...


too true
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 7, 2011 5:28 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
emmaline
emmalineemmalineatlanta, Georgia USA6 Threads 1,685 Posts
let us not forget that muslims have been subjected to much violence and genocide aswell




The first Holocaust against Muslims was carried out by the crusaders. On Friday, July 15, 1099 the crusaders captured Jerusalem and murdered thousands of Muslims. More than 70, 000 dead bodies of Muslim children and women were found in the Mosque of Omar in Jerusalem alone.

There have been several other Holocausts and genocides of Muslims;

Ganges Khan and his forces killed more than a million Muslims during the occupation of Iraq and neighboring areas.

Thousands of Muslims were killed / forced to change religion by Spanish Crusaders in South America

More than a million Muslims were killed / displaced by Spanish and other European extremists during the rebellion against the Ottoman Empire.

More than 3 million Muslims were killed / displaced by the European colonial powers during and after the occupation of Muslim countries after World War I and II.

More than 5 million Muslims were killed / displaced by Tsars of Russia

More than a million Muslims were killed / displaced by Communist Government of Russia

More than 1.5 million Muslims have been killed in China, Cambodia, Vietnam, and other Far East countries since the world war II

More than half million Muslims have been killed / displaced in Burma since World War II

More than half million Muslims have been killed in India and Kashmir since 1947

More than half million Muslims were killed by Serbs and Croats in Bosnia during early 90s.

More than 100,000 Muslims were killed in Kosovo and Albania during mid 90s.

More than 5 million Muslims have been killed / displaced in Palestine since 1948

More than 5 million Muslims were killed / displaced by the Russian occupation of Afghanistan

Thousands of Muslims have been killed by the secular governments in Muslim countries, backed by the Western Governments, since the independence from the colonial powers.

One million Muslim children died due to malnutrition during UN/US embargo on Iraq in 1990s.

Currently, hundreds of innocent civilians have been killed by the American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan


all religions have brutalistic attributes
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 7, 2011 9:23 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
thelastgoodman0
thelastgoodman0thelastgoodman0Somewhere, Arkansas USA5 Threads 2 Polls 119 Posts
emmaline: [. . .]One million Muslim children died due to malnutrition during UN/US embargo on Iraq in 1990s.


Assuming that your statistics are accurate, and there's very little doubt that they are, considering the history of propaganda in the region (e.g., Egypt falsely declaring victory in the first day of the Six-Day war with Israel, etc.), I can't let you get away with saying that without pointing out that Sadam Hussain gained weight as those alleged million children allegedly starved, so you can't blame the UN/US embargo. Blame must be placed on the former Iraqi government having little for value the lives of its people. Blame must be placed in the right place on a lot of your other attempts to demonize, too. I somewhat doubt the statistics, as most Muslim deaths throughout history have been at the hands of other Muslims.

Yes, yes... we all know about the Crusades. How long ago was that? I surely wasn't alive, and neither were you, so it's just a history lesson and shouldn't be viewed as a motivation for anything. Nobody living today suffered from the Crusades.

In response to: Ganges Khan and his forces killed more than a million Muslims during the occupation of Iraq and neighboring areas.


Khan killed his own brother, too, so he wasn't just picking on Muslims. The inclusion of this statistic is pointless. Khan killed everyone.

In response to: Thousands of Muslims were killed / forced to change religion by Spanish Crusaders in South America


Ok, are you just making things up? There were no Muslims in South America back then as far as anyone else on earth has recorded history. The Spanish would have kept records of anything like that, too. The native people of South America didn't tell any tales of anyone Islamic ever being there before the men from Spain. Whoever created that history for you is selling you a fiction.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 7, 2011 11:22 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
emmaline
emmalineemmalineatlanta, Georgia USA6 Threads 1,685 Posts
thelastgoodman0: Assuming that your statistics are accurate, and there's very little doubt that they are, considering the history of propaganda in the region (e.g., Egypt falsely declaring victory in the first day of the Six-Day war with Israel, etc.), I can't let you get away with saying that without pointing out that Sadam Hussain gained weight as those alleged million children allegedly starved, so you can't blame the UN/US embargo. Blame must be placed on the former Iraqi government having little for value the lives of its people. Blame must be placed in the right place on a lot of your other attempts to demonize, too. I somewhat doubt the statistics, as most Muslim deaths throughout history have been at the hands of other Muslims.

Yes, yes... we all know about the Crusades. How long ago was that? I surely wasn't alive, and neither were you, so it's just a history lesson and shouldn't be viewed as a motivation for anything. Nobody living today suffered from the Crusades.
Khan killed his own brother, too, so he wasn't just picking on Muslims. The inclusion of this statistic is pointless. Khan killed everyone.
Ok, are you just making things up? There were no Muslims in South America back then as far as anyone else on earth has recorded history. The Spanish would have kept records of anything like that, too. The native people of South America didn't tell any tales of anyone Islamic ever being there before the men from Spain. Whoever created that history for you is selling you a fiction.


1.ok, so put embargo's in place so that the iraqi people suffer greatly, and they will oust their leader, so we can protect our oil supplies. makes much sense to me, to allow suffering of the citizens, to punish the regime..Estimates of civilian deaths during from the sanctions range from 100,000 to over 1.5 million, most of them children

American war policy architect Douglas J. Feith has argued that the sanctions diminished Iraq militarily, in terms of WMDs, and in its capacity for attacks against its neighbors as its supply lines were cut. In a 2004 Foreign Affairs journal article, the scholars George A. Lopez and David Cortright credit sanctions with: "Compelling Iraq to accept inspections and monitoring; winning concessions from Baghdad on political issue such as the border dispute with Kuwait; preventing the rebuilding of Iraqi defenses after the Persian Gulf War; and blocking the import of vital materials and technologies for producing weapons of mass destruction." Cortright and Lopez argue that "the much-maligned UN-enforced sanctions regime actually ... helped destroy Saddam Hussein's war machine and his capacity to produce weapons." Hussein told his FBI interrogator that Iraq's armaments "had been eliminated by the UN sanctions"

2. i refer to the crusades, due to their being a significant amount of fingerpointing, about which religion is more brutal. but then again, why refer to it, its not valid in the debate, when the core of the debate has been so far, how barbarianistic are some muslims. what i am pointing to here, is the hypocrisy of that thought. all religions have blood on their hands

3. they came with the spaniards, not before, but were nonetheless victims of genocide

------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 8, 2011 4:40 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
Indigo_Flow
Indigo_FlowIndigo_FlowAdelaide, South Australia Australia2 Threads 170 Posts
emmaline: all religions have brutalistic attributes


Without religion you would have good men doing good things and bad men doing bad things. But for good men to do bad things, that takes religion.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 8, 2011 10:37 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
emmaline
emmalineemmalineatlanta, Georgia USA6 Threads 1,685 Posts
Indigo_Flow: Without religion you would have good men doing good things and bad men doing bad things. But for good men to do bad things, that takes religion.


well saidthumbs up
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 8, 2011 10:51 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
jvaski
jvaskijvaskiunknown, California USA115 Threads 11 Polls 9,576 Posts
Indigo_Flow: Without religion you would have good men doing good things and bad men doing bad things. But for good men to do bad things, that takes religion.


I like that analogy ! thumbs up beer
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 8, 2011 11:31 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
Blues63
Blues63Blues63Brisbane, Queensland Australia6 Threads 1 Polls 2,934 Posts
emmaline: The first Holocaust against Muslims was carried out by the crusaders. On Friday, July 15, 1099 the crusaders captured Jerusalem and murdered thousands of Muslims. More than 70, 000 dead bodies of Muslim children and women were found in the Mosque of Omar in Jerusalem alone.


...don't forget to mention the slaughtered Jews and Christians.

Contrary to populist notions, the Crusaders didn't give a fig about Pope Urban's edict. They went to Outremer for wealth, land and power.

Furthermore, the lands in question once belonged to the Eastern Roman Empire. People seem to think these territories were always Muslim. The Byzantine state spent it's entire existence trying to curb the tide of Islamic expansion. Eight hundred years later it was exhausted and conquered. We can't even comprehend a struggle lasting for that length of time.

The politics of this period are crucial in understanding the Crusades. Leftist historiography tends to omit this point.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 9, 2011 8:06 PM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
vcroome
vcroomevcroomeHolyoke, Massachusetts USA1 Threads 46 Posts
Despite the stereotype to the contrary, I've found many Muslim men to be much more respectful of women and faithful to their wives than many Christian men. Of course there are exceptions and this is certainly not true in all cases, but this is a trend I've noticed.

If I was in love with a man who is Muslim (or whatever religion), I would consider 'converting'. My problem is that I do not believe in god, period. Christian god, Muslim Allah, etc. I can't change that fact. But I'd be willing to live the lifestyle of my family, whatever religion they practice.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 10, 2011 2:38 AM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
frenchfree
frenchfreefrenchfreesaint-brieuc, Bretagne France4 Threads 188 Posts
vcroome: Despite the stereotype to the contrary, I've found many Muslim men to be much more respectful of women and faithful to their wives than many Christian men. Of course there are exceptions and this is certainly not true in all cases, but this is a trend I've noticed.

If I was in love with a man who is Muslim (or whatever religion), I would consider 'converting'. My problem is that I do not believe in god, period. Christian god, Muslim Allah, etc. I can't change that fact. But I'd be willing to live the lifestyle of my family, whatever religion they practice.


Think about that.

------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 10, 2011 2:40 AM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
Blues63: ...don't forget to mention the slaughtered Jews and Christians.

Contrary to populist notions, the Crusaders didn't give a fig about Pope Urban's edict. They went to Outremer for wealth, land and power.

Furthermore, the lands in question once belonged to the Eastern Roman Empire. People seem to think these territories were always Muslim. The Byzantine state spent it's entire existence trying to curb the tide of Islamic expansion. Eight hundred years later it was exhausted and conquered. We can't even comprehend a struggle lasting for that length of time.

The politics of this period are crucial in understanding the Crusades. Leftist historiography tends to omit this point.
thumbs up thumbs up thumbs up
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 10, 2011 2:40 AM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
frenchfree
frenchfreefrenchfreesaint-brieuc, Bretagne France4 Threads 188 Posts
AtwoZ: A recent English survey,made by Swansea University,shows that the converts from Christianity to Islam has increased from 60.000 to 100.000 since 2001.The same survey shows that women make up the greater part of the converts.
Of course,the same tendencies can be found throughout the whole Western,Christian sphere....
Now,of course,-people worldwide do convert back&forth,-and that is nothing new....

But if we focus on Christ./Islam,-I´m really surprised and curious for the reason(s)....
What are the reason,that so many tend to adapt Islam?

I´m not gonna use the terms Christianity or Islam,-but rather NT and Quran,as they´re the platforms for theses faiths.

What does Quran provide a convert that NT don´t?
What makes Mohammed more "attractive" than Jesus?
As both faiths are monotheistic,and "having" the "same" God,-why even bother to convert?
As the "goal" for both faiths are the same,-a life post mortem,-why convert?

Or is there a simple answer to it,-converting out of secular reasons?
It often strikes me,when I talk to converts,that hardly none ever read the Bibble or attended Church while they still where Christians.As a matter of fact,none of ´em where even believerts...
But adapting Islam changed them dramatically,-from atheists to believers,-well,at least in public....I recently spoke to a convert,-he was about to become Imam,-and he hardly even knew Pauli....
He has to,-no NT,no Quran.....

Or can it be,that convertations are based on completely different thing´s?
For love of a partner,for getting attention,substitution for an empty life?Or out of conveniance,-as Quran is "easier" to understand than NT?Just curious....


Brain intoxication. All over the world. By publicating so widely, you participate. Sorry. confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jan 10, 2011 8:53 AM CST .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
anblu45
anblu45anblu45treviso, Veneto Italy31 Threads 2 Polls 731 Posts
Despite the stereotype to the contrary, I've found many Muslim men to be much more respectful of women and faithful to their wives than many Christian men. Of course there are exceptions and this is certainly not true in all cases, but this is a trend I've noticed.

If I was in love with a man who is Muslim (or whatever religion), I would consider 'converting'. My problem is that I do not believe in god, period. Christian god, Muslim Allah, etc. I can't change that fact. But I'd be willing to live the lifestyle of my family, whatever religion they practice.






good proposals but as you can the reality it's always against the pure good intentions
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here