Restrictions on Habeas Corpus ( Archived) (73)

Feb 19, 2011 11:11 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
gleneagle: So Is that why John Walker Lindh was taken back and given twenty years after he was arrested post Taliban uprising?
John Phillip Walker Lindh (born February 9, 1981) is an American citizen who was captured as an enemy combatant during the United States' 2001 invasion of Afghanistan. He is now serving a 20-year prison sentence in connection with his participation in Afghanistan's Taliban army. He was captured during the Battle of Qala-i-Jangi, a violent Taliban prison uprising where American CIA officer Johnny "Mike" Spann was killed.



------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:13 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
gardenhackle
gardenhacklegardenhackleStratford, Connecticut USA55 Threads 9 Polls 2,067 Posts
gleneagle: So Is that why John Walker Lindh was taken back and given twenty years after he was arrested post Taliban uprising?


John Walker actually should have been put before a firing squad for treason. Or at least he COULD have been. US Citizens participating in acts of war against the USA have a TRULY special status.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:14 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
gleneagle
gleneaglegleneagleNew York City, New York USA36 Threads 3 Polls 1,147 Posts
Conrad73: John Phillip Walker Lindh (born February 9, 1981) is an American citizen who was captured as an enemy combatant during the United States' 2001 invasion of Afghanistan. He is now serving a 20-year prison sentence in connection with his participation in Afghanistan's Taliban army. He was captured during the Battle of Qala-i-Jangi, a violent Taliban prison uprising where American CIA officer Johnny "Mike" Spann was killed.
Mr Conrad I wish to inform you that my eyesight does not require your use of large print. scold
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:15 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
gleneagle
gleneaglegleneagleNew York City, New York USA36 Threads 3 Polls 1,147 Posts
thumbs up
gardenhackle: John Walker actually should have been put before a firing squad for treason. Or at least he COULD have been. US Citizens participating in acts of war against the USA have a TRULY special status.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:16 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
Colleene1024
Colleene1024Colleene1024West Warwick, Rhode Island USA10 Threads 1,225 Posts
gleneagle: Mr Conrad I wish to inform you that my eyesight does not require your use of large print.


Actually I think that was mostly meant for me... LOL! I was the ignorant one if you remember. laugh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:18 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
gleneagle: Mr Conrad I wish to inform you that my eyesight does not require your use of large print.
I didn't say so!
Would be bad at your age!grin
Just highlighted the important Passage!
That the Guy was indeed an American Citizen,and that it was the reason to ship him back Stateside!grin
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:19 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
LILLYLADY
LILLYLADYLILLYLADYunknown, Ohio USA27 Threads 1,293 Posts
gardenhackle: John Walker actually should have been put before a firing squad for treason. Or at least he COULD have been. US Citizens participating in acts of war against the USA have a TRULY special status.


Yes, I think the firing squad would have been most appropriate.thumbs up What a waste of our taxpayers money.

That darn Habeus Corpus.thumbs down
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:20 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
LILLYLADY
LILLYLADYLILLYLADYunknown, Ohio USA27 Threads 1,293 Posts
LILLYLADY: Yes, I think the firing squad would have been most appropriate. What a waste of our taxpayers money.

That darn Habeus Corpus.


Sorry folks, I meant "darn"...not damn.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:24 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
Colleene1024
Colleene1024Colleene1024West Warwick, Rhode Island USA10 Threads 1,225 Posts
Habeas Corpus is protected by Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, which states, “The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”

Therefore, IMHO, I feel that even if someone is attempting harm on this country they should be brought here and brought to justice. ow the sentence should be carried out and where.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:25 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
It is not a case of Habeas Corpus but it is a clear case of infringement of Human Rights by U.S. (being the torch bearer of Human Rights)
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:27 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
Colleene1024
Colleene1024Colleene1024West Warwick, Rhode Island USA10 Threads 1,225 Posts
LILLYLADY: Yes, I think the firing squad would have been most appropriate. What a waste of our taxpayers money.

That darn Habeus Corpus.



Think about it this way Lilly, restrictions on Habeas Corpus undermine the war against terror and put our national security further at risk. Habeas Corpus legitimizes the war against terror by ensuring that US actions against suspected terrorists have some legal basis and are not purely subjective. Furthermore, if the US disregards Habeas protections, it sets a dangerous precedent for the rest of the world to follow. If other countries followed suit, US citizens abroad could be indefinitely detained with no legal recourse.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:28 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
mastic55
mastic55mastic55Long Island, New York USA167 Threads 6,859 Posts
Isn't Habeas Corpus Jimmys Hendrexes back up band.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:29 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
Colleene1024: It's basically saying that we should not fight a war with one hand tied behind our backs. Also, The events of September 11 constituted an unprecedented attack on American soil. The US government must do everything in its power to ensure that the individuals responsible cannot participate in further terrorist activities. Restricting suspected terrorists’ rights to challenge their detentions is necessary to achieve that goal. Terror suspects still have recourse to military tribunals, which contain many of the same safeguards as the federal court system.


They'd have a tough job participating any further - they all died in the plane crash. doh If America want's to win friends and influence people ..... then stay the hell out of other countries affairs and politics - or suffer the consequences - America's opinion is irrelevant. Since America is so deep into espionage in other countries, then perhaps Europe and Arabic countries should treat all American tourists as 'spies' and incarcerate them in Auswitch, without trial or rights, until the US desists from it's espionage activities, after all Europe and the Arabic countries have the right to defend themselves against such outrageous activities.frustrated
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:30 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
ZAKER: It is not a case of Habeas Corpus but it is a clear case of infringement of Human Rights by U.S. (being the torch bearer of Human Rights)
What is?confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:30 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
Colleene1024
Colleene1024Colleene1024West Warwick, Rhode Island USA10 Threads 1,225 Posts
ZAKER: It is not a case of Habeas Corpus but it is a clear case of infringement of Human Rights by U.S. (being the torch bearer of Human Rights)


So what your tell me is, if the US raised up against India like a taliban and caused terrorism, your country would not try to go after the people who started it and bring them to justice?
confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:31 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
Trealach01: They'd have a tough job participating any further - they all died in the plane crash. If America want's to win friends and influence people ..... then stay the hell out of other countries affairs and politics - or suffer the consequences - America's opinion is irrelevant. Since America is so deep into espionage in other countries, then perhaps Europe and Arabic countries should treat all American tourists as 'spies' and incarcerate them in Auswitch, without trial or rights, until the US desists from it's espionage activities, after all Europe and the Arabic countries have the right to defend themselves against such outrageous activities.
drinking drinking drinking wow confused Bet you feel relieved!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:33 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
Colleene1024
Colleene1024Colleene1024West Warwick, Rhode Island USA10 Threads 1,225 Posts
Trealach01: They'd have a tough job participating any further - they all died in the plane crash. If America want's to win friends and influence people ..... then stay the hell out of other countries affairs and politics - or suffer the consequences - America's opinion is irrelevant. Since America is so deep into espionage in other countries, then perhaps Europe and Arabic countries should treat all American tourists as 'spies' and incarcerate them in Auswitch, without trial or rights, until the US desists from it's espionage activities, after all Europe and the Arabic countries have the right to defend themselves against such outrageous activities.



I'm with you on that. I have alot of issues with my country! I am just woundering how others feel about the Habeous Corpus as it has been adopted into other countries as well. conversing
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:33 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
gleneagle
gleneaglegleneagleNew York City, New York USA36 Threads 3 Polls 1,147 Posts
Of course when John Walker joined the Taliban the United States was not at war with them. Just to clear a point in my mind;Did the US actually declare war?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:34 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
patmac
patmacpatmacglasgow, Strathclyde, Scotland UK730 Threads 6 Polls 9,662 Posts
Conrad73: Were German Prisoners of War,interned in the US kidnapped?


They were not denounced by folk who took money for denouncing often innocent people.

At least 5 Brits who are now chasing and getting compensation.

Numerous Pakistanis and a load of Afghanies as well.

Many Iraq's as well the list id fairly long.

These folk were not combatants, that is what makes the rendition shakey.

Captured on the field of war is different.

As POW's the US can and did take them but not the folk I have described.
grin cheers
------ This thread is Archived ------
Feb 19, 2011 11:38 AM CST Restrictions on Habeas Corpus
Colleene1024
Colleene1024Colleene1024West Warwick, Rhode Island USA10 Threads 1,225 Posts
patmac: They were not denounced by folk who took money for denouncing often innocent people.

At least 5 Brits who are now chasing and getting compensation.

Numerous Pakistanis and a load of Afghanies as well.

Many Iraq's as well the list id fairly long.

These folk were not combatants, that is what makes the rendition shakey.

Captured on the field of war is different.

As POW's the US can and did take them but not the folk I have described.


So, once an individual is captured and brought to the countries own soil that was under attack, should they be given the Habeous Corpus right?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here