FAKE (186)
------ This thread is Archived ------
@ ElysianFields 
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
Cavalero: Thanks for the thread.
I hardly ever wanted to fight and would give the bully-idiots a chance to turn and leave, which they'd hardly ever took since we're talking about kids/individuals who seldom look past their own noses.
As for teachers... "There aren't any bad students, only bad teachers" is what I read from a university professor. I agree with that. Of course, if the parents don't take responsibility for the child's education then the problem is even more complicated.
I hardly ever wanted to fight and would give the bully-idiots a chance to turn and leave, which they'd hardly ever took since we're talking about kids/individuals who seldom look past their own noses.
As for teachers... "There aren't any bad students, only bad teachers" is what I read from a university professor. I agree with that. Of course, if the parents don't take responsibility for the child's education then the problem is even more complicated.
Not sure entirely on the "bad teachers" ... but certainly inadequately trained teachers for sure quite often ...
It doesn't show up until a teacher is faced with a classroom of more challenging students ...
------ This thread is Archived ------
jac_the_gripper: I feel strangely feline right now.
It's a good feeling; much less ludicrous than my usual canine manifestation.
Puhshaw. Nothing at all ludicrous about a canine manifestation. It's a good feeling; much less ludicrous than my usual canine manifestation.
------ This thread is Archived ------
tomcatty: No two people can do what we did IRL.
Ah. Well then, I hate to break it to you TomCat, but you must be forgettable IRL, because I don't remember a thing. ------ This thread is Archived ------
Cranky_Geezer: As I recall, someone's butt is camera shy.
Tis true. It does avoid the lens. 
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dedovix: sorry had to shorten your post .
I will also try to make it short - You have no clue so you divert it to psychology - terrain where you feel safe -Instead of psychology i highly recommend philosophy - Sun Tzu
No we are not psychological damaged individuals - All the conspiracy theories are on the Internet - now ask yourself who controls the flow of information on the small bubble of information that is accessible to us -And dont think that dark web and deep web are not controlled by the same people.
Secret services have divisions for realising bits of truth along with disinformation .its a tactic of creating your enemy, same as creating your opposition in a Government -David Icke is one of this project a deep undercover MI agent
“All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”
You have missed my point completely.I will also try to make it short - You have no clue so you divert it to psychology - terrain where you feel safe -Instead of psychology i highly recommend philosophy - Sun Tzu
No we are not psychological damaged individuals - All the conspiracy theories are on the Internet - now ask yourself who controls the flow of information on the small bubble of information that is accessible to us -And dont think that dark web and deep web are not controlled by the same people.
Secret services have divisions for realising bits of truth along with disinformation .its a tactic of creating your enemy, same as creating your opposition in a Government -David Icke is one of this project a deep undercover MI agent
“All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”
If you know philosophy, you know that stating something doesn't make it true.
Psychology is neither, or both safe and/or unsafe. I simply stated how we process information, or the lack thereof, in a bid too make sense of our worlds and survive.
That survival mechanism needs to be overridden to properly untangle objective fact. We can only prove a conspiracy theory to be true by establishing objective fact.
The first time a post of mine came with a 'profile deleted' thumbnail, I thought I had been banned - that's my first conspiracy theory.
I needed to verify, or refute my conspiracy theory by trying to use the site again. I found I was logged out, but could log in, therefore I had unequivocally refuted my first conspiracy theory. I had not been banned.
I proposed a second hypothesis, or conspiracy theory that I was suspended from posting. I tried posting, found I could and so unequivocably refuted that theory as well.
After it happened a few times the penny dropped it was about being automatically logged out whilst taking too long composing my posts. It was part of an observable pattern of events, or empirical evidence.
What you present in your posts is the hypothesis that you have formulated. Stating your hypothesis does not make it true.
Stating "My post has come up with a 'profile deleted' thumbnail, therefore I have been banned!" does not make it true, believable, nor understandable.
Stating "It's a glitch" does not fully refute my conspiracy theories, nor make it plausible as a possibility.
When I propose the hypothesis of why the 'deleted profile' thumbnail comes up, I go through the argument step by step -
#1 hypothesis (I've been banned)
*evidence to refute (I can still log in)
#2 hypothesis (I've been suspended from posting)
*evidence to refute (I can post)
#3 hypothesis (programme glitch)
*empirical evidence (I observe I have been automatically logged out)
*and a plausible explanation based upon a fact (when I am logged out, the blog, or forum programme can't access my profile information)
The next stage to fully prove #3 hypothesis would be to verify my plausible and logical explanation by asking the site programmer.
When you can present each hypothesis (whether that's who controls the flow of information accessible to us, David Icke is an MI agent, #1 information is disinformation. #2 information is truth, or whatever) in a step by step argument, rather that a statement with no evidence, then people may listen and understand.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Kaybee50: Awright. Awright.
Back to the drawing board...
Say, does this camera make my butt look big?
Yes, thankyou.Back to the drawing board...
Say, does this camera make my butt look big?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Kaybee50: Puhshaw. Nothing at all ludicrous about a canine manifestation.
You haven't seen me staring hopefully at the biscuit tin.------ This thread is Archived ------
jac_the_gripper: Yes, thankyou.
------ This thread is Archived ------
jac_the_gripper: You haven't seen me staring hopefully at the biscuit tin.
G'ahead, g'ahead, indulge in those biscuits.------ This thread is Archived ------
Selenite: @ ElysianFields
It's unfair. Women can fake it. But men can't. One of life's great injustices.------ This thread is Archived ------
The world is round was a conspiracy theory... good to know someone investigated further and that boats don't flow off the edge.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Kaybee50: G'ahead, g'ahead, indulge in those biscuits.
I was lying, I don't actually like biscuits.But I do this when the mod takes me...
------ This thread is Archived ------
jac_the_gripper: I was lying, I don't actually like biscuits.
But I do this when the mod takes me...
That should have been 'mood'.But I do this when the mod takes me...
The mods haven't got me yet.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Kaybee50: Ah. Well then, I hate to break it to you TomCat, but you must be forgettable IRL, because I don't remember a thing.
Thank God for that, I heard you put it out to dogs
------ This thread is Archived ------
tomcatty: Thank God for that, I heard you put it out to dogs
That's not a very nice thing to say, even for you.
------ This thread is Archived ------
tomcatty: Thank God for that, I heard you put it out to dogs
And this from someone who professes to be a gentleman.------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
How far is too far?
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
rarotonga
Nature
Heavy Bass In The PM
Salami, Salami, Baloney
Icebergs Still Around
What I Lack In Vocabulary
Reality Check
1830's Music
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Great to hear you had some "class" teachers with a capital T:!!
Squashing their noses "like figs" is very graphic and I'm very sorry you had to resort to doing that. Although it sounds like it got you the bonus detention away from home
I hardly ever wanted to fight and would give the bully-idiots a chance to turn and leave, which they'd hardly ever took since we're talking about kids/individuals who seldom look past their own noses.
As for teachers... "There aren't any bad students, only bad teachers" is what I read from a university professor. I agree with that. Of course, if the parents don't take responsibility for the child's education then the problem is even more complicated.