Was Jesus married? (9)
Are you aware this carpenter guy could walk on water?
And silent the storm? More intrestingly, he asked his buddies in the boat to do the same ...and mind you, atleast one of them did. So with other words did you know the carpenters buddy walked on water?
And this guy needs a wife, even if he told us nobody marry in heaven. Alright...
I always heard he died at age 33.
And silent the storm? More intrestingly, he asked his buddies in the boat to do the same ...and mind you, atleast one of them did. So with other words did you know the carpenters buddy walked on water?
And this guy needs a wife, even if he told us nobody marry in heaven. Alright...
I always heard he died at age 33.
------ This thread is Archived ------
I agree about the mother stuff though.
Jesus said to her once "who are you woman...?"
Jesus said to her once "who are you woman...?"
------ This thread is Archived ------
Orzzz: I vote yes. To Mary Magdalene. We are looking at a 40 year old man. A carpenter by trade. Living in a time when pretty much everyone got married. It was expected. He was a Jew to whom family is super important. Common sense says married. But, the Pope brigade screams at the idea. How else can they reason for celebrate priests?
I read once about how the l last supper shows one of them is actually female. And once that idea raises, it is hard NOT to see that person as a man. There have been hints in history of marriage. Why is it so out of the question? Does it cut down the love he was suppose to give to all? Make him out some deviate?
The other thing that bugs me is religion that makes an idol out of his mother, Mary. I see some worship her like a goddess.
Dang religions sure are confusing.
I agree with you, Jesus was a man, and had all the needs of a man, so why on earth shouldn't he get married to a nice Jewish girl? This brings up the question did he have children I read once about how the l last supper shows one of them is actually female. And once that idea raises, it is hard NOT to see that person as a man. There have been hints in history of marriage. Why is it so out of the question? Does it cut down the love he was suppose to give to all? Make him out some deviate?
The other thing that bugs me is religion that makes an idol out of his mother, Mary. I see some worship her like a goddess.
Dang religions sure are confusing.
you must know some people do claim to be his descendants .This brings up another question, was Jesus Gay, or Bi
What do you think of that.
I apologise if I offended anyone.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Orzzz: I vote yes. To Mary Magdalene. We are looking at a 40 year old man. A carpenter by trade. Living in a time when pretty much everyone got married. It was expected. He was a Jew to whom family is super important. Common sense says married. But, the Pope brigade screams at the idea. How else can they reason for celebrate priests?
I read once about how the l last supper shows one of them is actually female. And once that idea raises, it is hard NOT to see that person as a man. There have been hints in history of marriage. Why is it so out of the question? Does it cut down the love he was suppose to give to all? Make him out some deviate?
The other thing that bugs me is religion that makes an idol out of his mother, Mary. I see some worship her like a goddess.
Dang religions sure are confusing.
if you go to your nearest birth/marriage/death dept they can tell you. I read once about how the l last supper shows one of them is actually female. And once that idea raises, it is hard NOT to see that person as a man. There have been hints in history of marriage. Why is it so out of the question? Does it cut down the love he was suppose to give to all? Make him out some deviate?
The other thing that bugs me is religion that makes an idol out of his mother, Mary. I see some worship her like a goddess.
Dang religions sure are confusing.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Celebrate priests? Or celebate?
And DaVinci’s painting has a lot of controversy surrounding it, and it’s not the only one. Web search’ DaVinci painting x-ray’. Some very interesting stuff.
Jesus of Nazareth was not only a carpenter, but also a Rabbi (teacher).
Michaelangelo’s “The Last Judegment” fresco in the Sistine Chapel also contains some compelling imagery. Particularly the lower right corner. See if the faces depicted look just a little too familiar.
And DaVinci’s painting has a lot of controversy surrounding it, and it’s not the only one. Web search’ DaVinci painting x-ray’. Some very interesting stuff.
Jesus of Nazareth was not only a carpenter, but also a Rabbi (teacher).
Michaelangelo’s “The Last Judegment” fresco in the Sistine Chapel also contains some compelling imagery. Particularly the lower right corner. See if the faces depicted look just a little too familiar.
------ This thread is Archived ------
History of DaVinci's Last Supper. It sustained a lot of damage in the past 500 years including a WW2 bomb that destroyed the roof and another wall. From the Britanica website. 
The wall painting was commissioned by Ludovico Sforza, the duke of Milan and Leonardo’s patron during his first extended stay in that city. The Sforza coats of arms appear with the family’s initials on the three lunettes above the mural. Leonardo likely began working on the painting in 1495 and, as was his manner, worked slowly with long pauses between sessions, until he finished in 1498. Because of Leonardo’s notorious perfectionism, true fresco painting was not ideal, as the process requires that an artist apply paint quickly to each day’s fresh plaster before the plaster dries and bonds the pigment to the wall. Instead, Leonardo tried an experimental technique using tempera or oil paint on two layers of dry preparatory ground. His compromised process meant that the pigments were not permanently attached to the wall, however, and the painting began to flake within a few years. It continued to deteriorate, suffering from the steam and smoke of the monastery’s kitchen, soot from the refectory’s candles, and the dampness of the location.
In the ensuing centuries, the painting sustained additional damage. In 1652 a door was cut into the north wall, removing Jesus’ feet and loosening the paint and plaster. Several restorations followed, with heavy-handed retouches and the application of varnish, glue, solvents, and the like. The painting endured additional irreverence when Napoleon’s invading troops used the refectory as a stable. After a flood in the beginning of the 19th century, mold growth damaged the painting further still. During World War II the painting suffered its greatest catastrophe, when an Allied bomb caused the roof and one wall of the refectory to collapse. The painting survived, but it was exposed to the elements for several months before the space was rebuilt.
After centuries of maltreatment, the Last Supper underwent an extensive and controversial 20-year restoration that was completed in 1999. Restorers worked in small sections to remove previous retouches, layers of grime, and coats of varnish while adding beige watercolour to the parts that could not be recovered. When the restored painting was revealed, many critics argued that the restorers had removed so much of the painting that very little was left of Leonardo’s original work. Others, however, commended the recovery of such details as the Apostles’ expressions and the food on the table.
The wall painting was commissioned by Ludovico Sforza, the duke of Milan and Leonardo’s patron during his first extended stay in that city. The Sforza coats of arms appear with the family’s initials on the three lunettes above the mural. Leonardo likely began working on the painting in 1495 and, as was his manner, worked slowly with long pauses between sessions, until he finished in 1498. Because of Leonardo’s notorious perfectionism, true fresco painting was not ideal, as the process requires that an artist apply paint quickly to each day’s fresh plaster before the plaster dries and bonds the pigment to the wall. Instead, Leonardo tried an experimental technique using tempera or oil paint on two layers of dry preparatory ground. His compromised process meant that the pigments were not permanently attached to the wall, however, and the painting began to flake within a few years. It continued to deteriorate, suffering from the steam and smoke of the monastery’s kitchen, soot from the refectory’s candles, and the dampness of the location.
In the ensuing centuries, the painting sustained additional damage. In 1652 a door was cut into the north wall, removing Jesus’ feet and loosening the paint and plaster. Several restorations followed, with heavy-handed retouches and the application of varnish, glue, solvents, and the like. The painting endured additional irreverence when Napoleon’s invading troops used the refectory as a stable. After a flood in the beginning of the 19th century, mold growth damaged the painting further still. During World War II the painting suffered its greatest catastrophe, when an Allied bomb caused the roof and one wall of the refectory to collapse. The painting survived, but it was exposed to the elements for several months before the space was rebuilt.
After centuries of maltreatment, the Last Supper underwent an extensive and controversial 20-year restoration that was completed in 1999. Restorers worked in small sections to remove previous retouches, layers of grime, and coats of varnish while adding beige watercolour to the parts that could not be recovered. When the restored painting was revealed, many critics argued that the restorers had removed so much of the painting that very little was left of Leonardo’s original work. Others, however, commended the recovery of such details as the Apostles’ expressions and the food on the table.
------ This thread is Archived ------
KarloradoFL: History of DaVinci's Last Supper. It sustained a lot of damage in the past 500 years including a WW2 bomb that destroyed the roof and another wall. From the Britanica website.
The wall painting was commissioned by Ludovico Sforza, the duke of Milan and Leonardo’s patron during his first extended stay in that city. The Sforza coats of arms appear with the family’s initials on the three lunettes above the mural. Leonardo likely began working on the painting in 1495 and, as was his manner, worked slowly with long pauses between sessions, until he finished in 1498. Because of Leonardo’s notorious perfectionism, true fresco painting was not ideal, as the process requires that an artist apply paint quickly to each day’s fresh plaster before the plaster dries and bonds the pigment to the wall. Instead, Leonardo tried an experimental technique using tempera or oil paint on two layers of dry preparatory ground. His compromised process meant that the pigments were not permanently attached to the wall, however, and the painting began to flake within a few years. It continued to deteriorate, suffering from the steam and smoke of the monastery’s kitchen, soot from the refectory’s candles, and the dampness of the location.
In the ensuing centuries, the painting sustained additional damage. In 1652 a door was cut into the north wall, removing Jesus’ feet and loosening the paint and plaster. Several restorations followed, with heavy-handed retouches and the application of varnish, glue, solvents, and the like. The painting endured additional irreverence when Napoleon’s invading troops used the refectory as a stable. After a flood in the beginning of the 19th century, mold growth damaged the painting further still. During World War II the painting suffered its greatest catastrophe, when an Allied bomb caused the roof and one wall of the refectory to collapse. The painting survived, but it was exposed to the elements for several months before the space was rebuilt.
After centuries of maltreatment, the Last Supper underwent an extensive and controversial 20-year restoration that was completed in 1999. Restorers worked in small sections to remove previous retouches, layers of grime, and coats of varnish while adding beige watercolour to the parts that could not be recovered. When the restored painting was revealed, many critics argued that the restorers had removed so much of the painting that very little was left of Leonardo’s original work. Others, however, commended the recovery of such details as the Apostles’ expressions and the food on the table.
And they say I cut and pasteThe wall painting was commissioned by Ludovico Sforza, the duke of Milan and Leonardo’s patron during his first extended stay in that city. The Sforza coats of arms appear with the family’s initials on the three lunettes above the mural. Leonardo likely began working on the painting in 1495 and, as was his manner, worked slowly with long pauses between sessions, until he finished in 1498. Because of Leonardo’s notorious perfectionism, true fresco painting was not ideal, as the process requires that an artist apply paint quickly to each day’s fresh plaster before the plaster dries and bonds the pigment to the wall. Instead, Leonardo tried an experimental technique using tempera or oil paint on two layers of dry preparatory ground. His compromised process meant that the pigments were not permanently attached to the wall, however, and the painting began to flake within a few years. It continued to deteriorate, suffering from the steam and smoke of the monastery’s kitchen, soot from the refectory’s candles, and the dampness of the location.
In the ensuing centuries, the painting sustained additional damage. In 1652 a door was cut into the north wall, removing Jesus’ feet and loosening the paint and plaster. Several restorations followed, with heavy-handed retouches and the application of varnish, glue, solvents, and the like. The painting endured additional irreverence when Napoleon’s invading troops used the refectory as a stable. After a flood in the beginning of the 19th century, mold growth damaged the painting further still. During World War II the painting suffered its greatest catastrophe, when an Allied bomb caused the roof and one wall of the refectory to collapse. The painting survived, but it was exposed to the elements for several months before the space was rebuilt.
After centuries of maltreatment, the Last Supper underwent an extensive and controversial 20-year restoration that was completed in 1999. Restorers worked in small sections to remove previous retouches, layers of grime, and coats of varnish while adding beige watercolour to the parts that could not be recovered. When the restored painting was revealed, many critics argued that the restorers had removed so much of the painting that very little was left of Leonardo’s original work. Others, however, commended the recovery of such details as the Apostles’ expressions and the food on the table.
A nice informational piece
------ This thread is Archived ------
It is sad how much damage art works incur. Think of the loss from wars. Like ISEL blowing up all the stuff in Iraq and elsewhere.
Too much credence is given to a select group of books written decades after Jesus died. Some were cast off. All have been modified, re-written, re-translated and changed by the learned men who not only could read and understand an ancient language, but also could write.
A cult has risen up to portray a carpenter who was a Jewish Rabbi. Instead of dwelling on the kindness and hopes for humankind, it dwells in mysticism and every generation has interpreted the teaching as to suit them. Humans like to pick and choose the texts that suit their purpose regardless of any true meaning.
Idolatry is forbidden. Yet churches are filled with crosses and statues that people worship to. Things get muddled by too many.
Too much credence is given to a select group of books written decades after Jesus died. Some were cast off. All have been modified, re-written, re-translated and changed by the learned men who not only could read and understand an ancient language, but also could write.
A cult has risen up to portray a carpenter who was a Jewish Rabbi. Instead of dwelling on the kindness and hopes for humankind, it dwells in mysticism and every generation has interpreted the teaching as to suit them. Humans like to pick and choose the texts that suit their purpose regardless of any true meaning.
Idolatry is forbidden. Yet churches are filled with crosses and statues that people worship to. Things get muddled by too many.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
wanting beyond need
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
Ladies
The weird and the random facts around the world
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
Sleepy Don!
the way you look
Unions support Democrats!
other can see but not you
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
429 Views
8 Comments
in Chat Threads
Created: Nov 2022
Last Viewed: 5 hrs ago
Last Commented: Nov 2022
5 Likes
Last Liked: Nov 2022
17 DisAgrees
Last DisAgreed: Nov 2022
I read once about how the l last supper shows one of them is actually female. And once that idea raises, it is hard NOT to see that person as a man. There have been hints in history of marriage. Why is it so out of the question? Does it cut down the love he was suppose to give to all? Make him out some deviate?
The other thing that bugs me is religion that makes an idol out of his mother, Mary. I see some worship her like a goddess.
Dang religions sure are confusing.