Decent_Love: Sometimes I think, if there would be any planet in this universe where living beings would not fight with each other, and all would live peacefully.
Decent_Love: Sometimes I think, if there would be any planet in this universe where living beings would not fight with each other, and all would live peacefully.
Well it would be nice to find a species like that. Maybe if they evolved without the food chain the problem would be solved. In this world peaceful are the ones who get eaten, and a dog eat dog world working in telesales amongst the privileged people ever to have lived.
ChesneyChrist: Well it would be nice to find a species like that. Maybe if they evolved without the food chain the problem would be solved. In this world peaceful are the ones who get eaten, and a dog eat dog world working in telesales amongst the privileged people ever to have lived.
spikkels999: Universe & Galaxy...which are your definitions...?
The universe is by definition the one thing. I consider time part of the universe and therefore The Big Bang is absurd. But that's nearly a semantic argument. Local space is "expanding," but there is no need for one beginning and one end. Galaxies are those swirly things like the Milky Way. Lots of pics available--composed of stars and groups of stars. I assume you know they swirl out rather than in?
TTKSpectre: The universe is by definition the one thing. I consider time part of the universe and therefore The Big Bang is absurd. But that's nearly a semantic argument. Local space is "expanding," but there is no need for one beginning and one end. Galaxies are those swirly things like the Milky Way. Lots of pics available--composed of stars and groups of stars. I assume you know they swirl out rather than in?
I just read your bio and liked what I saw... My point is:- There is No Proof of all the space beliefs so people like me have our own concepts of them...no-one has gone past earth and still know nothing of the moon or mars...for the first time they are sending a man to mars too,..I queried the safety of the water...
Please stick with the scientific method! First, you must prove the existence of a brain. Then you can begin to make supostions about its relative functionality.
Iyyov: Please stick with the scientific method! First, you must prove the existence of a brain. Then you can begin to make supostions about its relative functionality.
lol ;)
Lol...you are so right.. Just my virtual presence intimidates... Poor things...
spikkels999: IMy point is:- There is No Proof of all the space beliefs so people like me have our own concepts of them...no-one has gone past earth and still know nothing of the moon or mars...for the first time they are sending a man to mars too,..I queried the safety of the water...
Coherence is a good proof. Admittedly the current academics have little of it. But we can predict the phases of the moon. BTW, it's my understanding the Scientific Method is theory-test-new theory. Math only enters into it in step 2, test. The current theories deduced from math are not scientific. Math is a formal logic (though mathematicians dispute this). Logic fails if its suppositions are faulty. So Quantum Mechanics is a hoax.
TTKSpectre: Coherence is a good proof. Admittedly the current academics have little of it. But we can predict the phases of the moon. BTW, it's my understanding the Scientific Method is theory-test-new theory. Math only enters into it in step 2, test. The current theories deduced from math are not scientific. Math is a formal logic (though mathematicians dispute this). Logic fails if its suppositions are faulty. So Quantum Mechanics is a hoax.
Yes I'm a glorified programmer exposed to Math and Science... Btw Math is logic that fails most testers of it... Most of Science is a hoax as in untested suppositions... Please reply...?
spikkels999: Yes I'm a glorified programmer exposed to Math and Science... Btw Math is logic that fails most testers of it... Most of Science is a hoax as in untested suppositions... Please reply...?
Most of science currently is unwarranted extrapolation, which vies with statistics as the lowest form of math. Both exceedingly popular today. But that doesn't mean everything is wrong. There is a problem here, current Scientists equate peer review with validation and it's more like Group Think.
TTKSpectre: Most of science currently is unwarranted extrapolation, which vies with statistics as the lowest form of math. Both exceedingly popular today. But that doesn't mean everything is wrong. There is a problem here, current Scientists equate peer review with validation and it's more like Group Think.
People are mostly doing what taught... They don't think out of the box... Too scared to stand out...
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).