amahlala: True...and I admit (freely) that I did my fair share of ad hominem and angry, vitriolic rhetoric and yet, I still think my "law" would make a good one....
I'm not scrolling back to find it. Currently there are no "laws" on the federal books, as Roe vs. Wade is not a legislative law, its a Judicial edict.
I don't like edicts coming from SCOTUS or POTUS. Having a bill pass through a legislative body and become law at least ensures everyone's opinion is represented in the debate. Edicts are just that; dictatorial.
amahlala: True...and I admit (freely) that I did my fair share of ad hominem and angry, vitriolic rhetoric and yet, I still think my "law" would make a good one....
Galactic_bodhi: I'm not scrolling back to find it. Currently there are no "laws" on the federal books, as Roe vs. Wade is not a legislative law, its a Judicial edict.
I don't like edicts coming from SCOTUS or POTUS. Having a bill pass through a legislative body and become law at least ensures everyone's opinion is represented in the debate. Edicts are just that; dictatorial.
Yes, I know there is no law on the books...and at the moment this is just a bill that will or will not make it into the books and I don't blame you for not scrolling back....
My little "law" (and I put in quotes because I know it would be passed) made as much sense as the bill that is being promoted in MS now.
ooby_dooby: I suggest you leave his daughter out of this thread, you're pushing the envelope.
I was referring to him. I'm sure his daughter is a good lil' kid! (incidently, I think kids pics are prohibited on CS, if I remember correctly?)
Incidently, both candidates running for governor are in favor of the legislation, so for those concerned, the women haters apparently are in both parties (Ooby).
There were concerns expressed on the news today that "they didn't know where the bill would lead". Certainly, if they don't have a clue, that on it's own, would indicate the bill should should be defeated. In the end, I would suspect the people of Mississippi will reject it.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
I'm not scrolling back to find it. Currently there are no "laws" on the federal books, as Roe vs. Wade is not a legislative law, its a Judicial edict.
I don't like edicts coming from SCOTUS or POTUS. Having a bill pass through a legislative body and become law at least ensures everyone's opinion is represented in the debate. Edicts are just that; dictatorial.