do you think america will attack north koria? (94)
i don't plan on attacking anyone, i will however defend myself and fammily
i don't know why we all can't just get along.
i don't know why we all can't just get along. ------ This poll is Archived ------
oranges2apples: i don't plan on attacking anyone, i will however defend myself and fammily i don't know why we all can't just get along.
I know what your saying.
------ This poll is Archived ------
laviola44: do you think america will attack north koria???
Yup... Right after North Korea attacks America... Or will they???
------ This poll is Archived ------
I'm sure of it....
As we speak, CIA agents are visiting 7-11 stores all over America...
Trying to reclut people to go there...as a 5th. column....
With the promise that, once the goverment is deposed, they can open the biggest convenience store in the city....
As we speak, CIA agents are visiting 7-11 stores all over America...
Trying to reclut people to go there...as a 5th. column....
With the promise that, once the goverment is deposed, they can open the biggest convenience store in the city....
------ This poll is Archived ------
I think i better leave this question to be answered by those "patriotic" republicans. It will be really be interesting to see what their answers entail.
------ This poll is Archived ------
laviola44: do you think america will attack north koria???
Never heard of the godamned place
------ This poll is Archived ------
laviola44: do you think america will attack north koria???
Where the heck is 'Koria"?
------ This poll is Archived ------
Any patriotic republicans please! hello!anybody out there!
------ This poll is Archived ------
laviola44: do you think america will attack north koria???
Are you hoping?
------ This poll is Archived ------
mnowsa: I think i better leave this question to be answered by those "patriotic" republicans. It will be really be interesting to see what their answers entail.
Interesting? You think a Republican answer is interesting? They're all the same! " National security" "Hit them first" "Preemptive strikes" "America is the leader of the world"... Interesting?
They need some new lines!
------ This poll is Archived ------
Grandepensees: Never heard of the godamned place
now, that was a classy answer, brother. After all, what's the use to learn about a country with nukes?
------ This poll is Archived ------
mnowsa: Any patriotic republicans please! hello!anybody out there!
------ This poll is Archived ------
IMHO North Korea has nothing the US wants, except nuclear warheads and they're all aimed directly at the US. I don't think even GWB was that stupid.
------ This poll is Archived ------
mnowsa: Any patriotic republicans please! hello!anybody out there!
Have you noticed he's from Iraq?
Maybe he's hoping for the U.S Military to get engaged in N.K so that maybe we'll leave 'em the hell alone over there
------ This poll is Archived ------
Grandepensees: Have you noticed he's from Iraq?
Maybe he's hoping for the U.S Military to get engaged in N.K so that maybe we'll leave 'em the hell alone over there
Maybe he's hoping for the U.S Military to get engaged in N.K so that maybe we'll leave 'em the hell alone over there
i can't really blame him if that's his intention after all..that thick-headed bush has destroyed that country, so he is probably hoping that Obama will do something different
------ This poll is Archived ------
But i am pretty sure that obama is not thick-headed after all to attack that country. I am sure USA is smart enough to neutralize N. Korea without attacking her.
------ This poll is Archived ------
mnowsa: i can't really blame him if that's his intention after all..that thick-headed bush has destroyed that country, so he is probably hoping that Obama will do something different
Sure!
Unfortunately, as long as countries like Iraq and Venezuela don't get in the pockets of the IMF and the Bilderburgers, they're doomed to get the shiat bombed out of them every 15 years or so.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Grandepensees: Sure!
Unfortunately, as long as countries like Iraq and Venezuela don't get in the pockets of the IMF and the Bilderburgers, they're doomed to get the shiat bombed out of them every 15 years or so.
Unfortunately, as long as countries like Iraq and Venezuela don't get in the pockets of the IMF and the Bilderburgers, they're doomed to get the shiat bombed out of them every 15 years or so.
So sad but true, i suppose
------ This poll is Archived ------
No, but Japan will
------ This poll is Archived ------
Grandepensees: Sure!
Unfortunately, as long as countries like Iraq and Venezuela don't get in the pockets of the IMF and the Bilderburgers, they're doomed to get the shiat bombed out of them every 15 years or so.
Unfortunately, as long as countries like Iraq and Venezuela don't get in the pockets of the IMF and the Bilderburgers, they're doomed to get the shiat bombed out of them every 15 years or so.
So sad but true, i suppose
------ This poll is Archived ------
mnowsa: But i am pretty sure that obama is not thick-headed after all to attack that country. I am sure USA is smart enough to neutralize N. Korea without attacking her.
That's the thing you see, the countries we REALLY should attack, we don't but the ones who talk a great deal yet don't really cause a whole lot of international harm ( remember, Iraq had nothing to do with 911 ) we like to flex our muscles on, knowing their military technology dates to the middle ages.
As far as attacking N.K, it'll be up to Kissinger to sort it out and up to Obama to pretend his decisions are followed.
------ This poll is Archived ------
nah...we just need to send a missile loaded with videos of "Team America".
All we have to do is wait for the old demented dictator to die naturally...and then see if the next guy will magically have a change of intelligence and heart for the people of the country. (yeah...I fantasize a lot.)
If it could be proven beyond any shadow of doubt that they were responsible for the cyber-attacks, then you can argue that this should be returned to them. Would it work? Some analyst can "prove" it will work, but probably more likely it will hurt the people of the country more then it will hurt the nutcase in charge.
All we have to do is wait for the old demented dictator to die naturally...and then see if the next guy will magically have a change of intelligence and heart for the people of the country. (yeah...I fantasize a lot.)
If it could be proven beyond any shadow of doubt that they were responsible for the cyber-attacks, then you can argue that this should be returned to them. Would it work? Some analyst can "prove" it will work, but probably more likely it will hurt the people of the country more then it will hurt the nutcase in charge.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Grandepensees: That's the thing you see, the countries we REALLY should attack, we don't but the ones who talk a great deal yet don't really cause a whole lot of international harm ( remember, Iraq had nothing to do with 911 ) we like to flex our muscles on, knowing their military technology dates to the middle ages.
As far as attacking N.K, it'll be up to Kissinger to sort it out and up to Obama to pretend his decisions are followed.
As far as attacking N.K, it'll be up to Kissinger to sort it out and up to Obama to pretend his decisions are followed.
Duh...if we don't attack a weaker country, how are we supposed to claim ourselves "victorious"(remember the mission accomplish thing?lol) and thereby establish our "patriotism".
------ This poll is Archived ------
Medsummer09: nah...we just need to send a missile loaded with videos of "Team America".
All we have to do is wait for the old demented dictator to die naturally...and then see if the next guy will magically have a change of intelligence and heart for the people of the country. (yeah...I fantasize a lot.)
If it could be proven beyond any shadow of doubt that they were responsible for the cyber-attacks, then you can argue that this should be returned to them. Would it work? Some analyst can "prove" it will work, but probably more likely it will hurt the people of the country more then it will hurt the nutcase in charge.
All we have to do is wait for the old demented dictator to die naturally...and then see if the next guy will magically have a change of intelligence and heart for the people of the country. (yeah...I fantasize a lot.)
If it could be proven beyond any shadow of doubt that they were responsible for the cyber-attacks, then you can argue that this should be returned to them. Would it work? Some analyst can "prove" it will work, but probably more likely it will hurt the people of the country more then it will hurt the nutcase in charge.
What, the CIA forgot how to execute a coup d'etat of a major order? Or are they running out of assassins?
------ This poll is Archived ------
mnowsa: Duh...if we don't attack a weaker country, how are we supposed to claim ourselves "victorious"(remember the mission accomplish thing?lol) and thereby establish our "patriotism".
When I saw how gung-ho those boys were going into Iraq and all the bomb paintings and the macho talk, I had a very bad feeling that they were going to eat their words.
The mission accomplished thing was the one and only sign that got me split in two laughing on my living room floor
------ This poll is Archived ------
oranges2apples: ...i don't know why we all can't just get along.
Because some people profit from war and rumors of war.
------ This poll is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: Because some people profit from war and rumors of war.
Hey, I hear we're going to attack Mongolia next week.. I'll be here waiting for my check, okay?
------ This poll is Archived ------
Grandepensees: Hey, I hear we're going to attack Mongolia next week.. I'll be here waiting for my check, okay?
yea.....i want some bonus too with my check
------ This poll is Archived ------
Grandepensees:
The mission accomplished thing was the one and only sign that got me split in two laughing on my living room floor
The mission accomplished thing was the one and only sign that got me split in two laughing on my living room floor
I think it was meant to be ridiculous.
Bush was the idiot "bad-cop".
One of his major functions (besides starting wars and killing millions of people) was to be so grotesquely unlikeable that Obama would look good by comparison (at least long enough to get into office and get his programs up and running).
People supported Obama,
not on his own record,
but because he seemed to be very different from Bush.
But he's really not that different after all.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Grandepensees: That's the thing you see, the countries we REALLY should attack, we don't but the ones who talk a great deal yet don't really cause a whole lot of international harm ( remember, Iraq had nothing to do with 911 ) we like to flex our muscles on, knowing their military technology dates to the middle ages.
As far as attacking N.K, it'll be up to Kissinger to sort it out and up to Obama to pretend his decisions are followed.
As far as attacking N.K, it'll be up to Kissinger to sort it out and up to Obama to pretend his decisions are followed.
Did you really mean Kissinger? I assume you meant the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, didn't you? Kissinger is still actively out there in the diplomatic arena, and so you may have actually meant him....but all he can do now is offer a powerful lecture, perhaps, but not "sort it out".
------ This poll is Archived ------
This Poll is Archived
This Poll is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Poll get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
More Threads
wanting beyond need
your favorite topic?
the way you look
Unions support Democrats!
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
s*xual skills
The weird and the random facts around the world
Kultur-multur
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Stats for this Poll
79 Votes
1,419 Views
94 Comments
Created: Jul 2009
Last Viewed: 4 mins ago
Last Commented: Jul 2009
Last Voted: Jul 2017
0 Likes
Related Forums
- wanting beyond need
- your favorite topic?
- the way you look
- Unions support Democrats!
- Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- Would you hire this guy - for any job?
- s*xual skills
- The weird and the random facts around the world
- Kultur-multur
do you think america will attack north koria?(Vote Below)