I can understand the points you guys make. I would prefer a world without them altogether. The reality however is obvious and sad. So many guns in the US means you need a gun to fight someone with a gun. Why can't we all just get along!
Abram: I'd say ditto, except for silencers. If someone is shooting at me, I'd like to know from where. If I can hear it, I'm still kickin', and I've always been someone who returns the favor.
A good sniper would only need one shot, and if the first shot is the only shot, the sound levels won't matter much for you.
For the same reasons as the other guy said about machine guns, I don't care too much about silencers. The average fellah, in the average situation isn't too hindered by having to buy a set of muffs for his head.
oh gods how i have dreamed of playing with rpg's and grenades oh if it were so i could say that i have lived hoorah . but making those things legal to own would just couse trouble . so i will have to stick with semi auto .
guns don't kill people people kill people if they can't get a gun what are they just gonna say screw it go home and watch wheel of fortune reruns ? no they will get a knife if they can't get a knife they will get a stick .
Leo78: Just wondering...given a few of the current forum topics what the percentages of people from right around the world think should be acceptable?
I'm for gun control with limits. Limits such as Americans with a criminal record such as a felony (assault) to not bear arms...wait---that's already in place! Also, a limit on assault weapons---like a bazooka and other Rambo like guns or a nuclear bomb launcher hahaha.
I'm against gun control cause if the ability to carry a firearm is taken away from a law abiding citizen then it's obvious only criminals will have guns.
Those who are for gun control are wrong in thinking that by passing a law that those who don't follow the law in the first place will suddenly start obeying the law and not have them or use them.Or that if all guns are taken away that the criminals aren't able to get them.
Depending on which one you had, it could roll your car if you fired it. And the ammo cannister would require at least a pick up to carry. I'd settle for a May Deuce. I could never be able to afford to fire it, but I'd like to have one.
I have no guns but I never want to see the constitution changed to make it illegal to own them. If I were living somewhere out of touch with any security like an island or far back in the hills I would own more than one, thank you.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Private gun ownership. For or against?(Vote Below)