At Osama' s death, what is your opinion about ISI? ( Archived) (27)

So they need the help of a Terrorist supporting Intelligence Agency?
ISI is why things going wacko overthere so often!

Whoa,not all Pakistanis are Terrorists!

The city that bin Laden was found in.....Abbottabad.....is military city. Reports here is that a two Pakistani military facilities....one 150 yards and the other 1.5 mile are from the
compound were he was found.

So maybe our Pakistani OP.....can tell us how a massive compound....8 times the average size Pakistani compound......
owned y two alQeada couriers..... with out any visible means of support.....was not known by the Pakistani gov't or military?

That is just one of many small questions being circulated here in the US media.

Pakistan is being kicked around like a football.

On one side is the globalist influence, (US, Britain, NATO, G20 etc).

On the other side there is Iran, China, Russia, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, etc.

The west will win out in the end because they still have the most weapons.

The ISI, like any intelligence agency in the world will do whatever the prevailing force tells it to do.

Intelligence agencies are just tools.
Money and military might are the real factors that determine what those agencies will do.

The trouble that has engulfed Pakistan , is well described by Nadeem F. Paracha, in ‘Dawn’ a Pakistani daily,excerpts:
20 to 30 years ago, being a youthful rebel usually meant being democratic and against anything that symbolised military intervention in politics or the use of faith to meet demagogic ends. Fast forward to today and the scene has been turned on its head. Today, mainly thanks to the brilliant ways the ‘Deep State’ has used to manoeuvre and mobilise the electronic media and certain ‘youth icons,’ young urban middle-class Pakistani ‘rebels’ are closest in their thoughts to the aspirations of the security establishment than ever before.
The urban youth elsewhere have platforms on mainstream media and generous opportunities to hold, well, their ‘revolutionary’ rallies. But this generation, has been given a ready-made narrative.
A narrative spun by right-wing media men and intellectuals backed by the civil-military establishment. It reflects the ‘strategic’ concerns of those sections of the establishment that has kept a ubiquitous presence in the country’s opinion-making institutions.
As I have mentioned before in many of my previous pieces on these pages, this narrative sees Pakistan as always being surrounded by malicious enemies that are to be dealt with through an always full and well-fed army and its ideological allies in the shape of the political clergy, right-wing ideologues and preferably media personnel and politicians. Even till about 25 years ago, this narrative was scorned and challenged, both intellectually and through political action, by numerous young, middle-class rebels.
Not anymore. Ironically, what was once decried as being establishmentarian mantra and modus-operandi to exercise illegitimate and undemocratic social and political control has now become a rallying cry of those waving their fists for a revolution.

………the explosive issue of drone attacks has been cleverly mutated into the kind of a bargaining chip that certain sections of the security apparatus use to haggle with its more sinister counterparts in the CIA. Journalist Najam Sethi maintains that these agencies use certain civilian politicians and media personnel to whip up anti-Americanism among the public to pressure US policy.
This pressure, according to Sethi, is excreted to get a better deal from the CIA whenever it refuses to play, what it says, is Pakistan’s ‘double game’ regarding the war against Islamist militants. Whatever the case, the truth is, it is a cynical move that a part of the establishment should be given (or asked to be given) an emotional and populist twist by certain politicians and media men.

What gives you all the right to meddle in our Affairs?
Remember Osama's Fatwa?