Dru, I get you, but my point was, he is trying to wind us up no matter how we choose to respond to him. Any woman who says they are just debating by totally refuting his facts and thinking, then making it sound like they don't think he trying to pick on us women, is contradicting themselves. Anyone can see what his baseless claims are meant to do.
Do you believe that X's intention was to debate? He is obviously trying to wind us women up, which would be the feeling that comes before our choice to even participate in his thread, disagreeing with his 'facts'.
Is there one woman here who disagrees with X without feeling he is picking on us? If so, we would be agreeing with him or somewhat open to seeing his way of reasoning. Anyone can tell that he is just trying to stir the pot with his baseless 'facts'. Sure, we may chose to respond to him in form of debate, or just stop at 'you're just stirring the pot'. Fact remains he cannot substantiate his points and is not genuinely out to debate.
He is constantly picking on women. A habitual trait I might add.
I'm just wondering if some men are even capable of touching or making love to women with their really degrading attitude, without causing some sort of physical harm to these women.
Hit the quote button when you want to respond to a specific post, though we will all read it. It is meant to show the flow of the conversation between us all.
lusciousmile Forum Posts (11,989)
RE: single mixers
Wow!