But Dru, the pure love doesn't happen if the 2 don't (at least somehow, to some degree) match each other on oh-so-many levels, IQ and often even family history included.
Even if it is NOT for breeding purposes.
I know it's irrelevant to this topic, just wanted to point it out.
A great point in time for someone to please define the word "commitment". I bet there will be as many different definitions as there are people posting them.
Oh, and whatever definition you subscribe to, I would have thought that it need not be an obligation but something one would want to be upfront about with the other person. That is, sure if your definition of commitment means you feel free to date one or more other, great do so. But perhaps you should check the other person's definition of commitment first, as there may be a mismatch in perspective. JMO
That was my exact point, Venere.
When the two are "cybering" (as if in another list on a "dating" thread) the meaning and the level of mutual commitment should be cleared out between the two cybering people -
but I don't think he was double dating. It's a fairly new concept - "virtual dating". Unless there was an explicit mutual understanding of a commitment to each other, it is not dating. Even if/when one of two develops a very strong emotional attachment, it's still not dating and the other person cannot be accused of being unfaithful or a player.
RE: The Person I Would Like To Thank !!!!
Hey Jesse
Did you see the little princess' photos yet?