I have posted some youtube videos because I have never being able to post videos from other sources here in CS fora, I wonder if that can be possible.
I will give you an example:
I find something interesting in Nat Geo and there is a video and no way I can post it here, so I go to youtube (because I know everything is there: Fact or not) then I get that video that I am interested at and get the link from youtube. Yet, I do acknowledge that youtube is not source that I would trust unless I see the origen of the video.
Another example: I would never consider "Pamela Geller" a reliable source she is twisted she does hate muslims, I do not love Muslims but certainly I do not hate them.
Finally, I have never seen You and/or Krema citing any reference from a scientific journal or a more specialized magazine or any source that is not for the masses yet you could prove me wrong, could you?
There is already a wall between México and USA and for the record I do not give a peanut if Trump wants to make another one or extend the existent one, as long as he pays for it (well if he does not pay taxes so he is not even paying indirectly for it) guess who is going to pay for the extension of the already existing wall?
There is proposition of a 20 % tax as the Border Adjustment Tax for imports!
I will get back to the numbers some other time because I am behind with my work, I have a report due on monday 8 am.
Krema I have seen your quoting wiki and the likes and I would many times to back up my ideas with some reference and if that is not ok for you, that is not my problem and I have not a desire to discuss it.
Regarding to the Ilegal drug dealing, it has two important ends:
1. The consumer in the biggest market of the world. -with a ilegal trade of 100 billion dollars in USA per year- 2. The dealer -including Mexican Drugs dealers yet not the only ones-
(and I am not part of either end)
The problem is way too big to deal with and the longer the govs (both USA and Mexico at least) take action the more harm it is causing not only in USA but in Mexico.
Crime related to illegal drugs is just unimaginable until you live it.
Let us please settle this down:
I do believe that both consumer and dealers of illegal drugs are both responsible of it and if you do not, let us agree to disagree.
Thank for the beer yet I have never acquire a taste for it I would prefer a glass of table wine.
"Net migration to the United States from Mexico is now essentially zero, and has been for some time. This represents both a reduced attractiveness to potential migrants of the U.S. economy and social environment while also indicating the greater attractiveness of the Mexican economy for its nationals.
There is no massive flow of Mexican migrants across the southern U.S. border that a new, almost 2000-mile wall would ameliorate. To the extent migration is a problem that must be addressed, the primary surge of migrants in the past several years has come from Central Americans desperate to leave the violent circumstances and dead-end economic prospects that many face in their home countries.
In order to address these issues effectively the United States actually needs Mexico’s cooperation to reduce the throughput of migrants from Central America as well as to assist with repatriation as appropriate. (The gathering storm of Cubans stuck in Mexico intending to migrate to the United States and now prevented from doing so by the change in U.S. policy is a perfect example.) And, in order to address the issues longer term, so that Central Americans prefer to stay at home and work for better circumstances there, the United States and Mexico clearly have consistent interests.
Cooperation to achieve improved results, however, will be much less forthcoming if relations between Washington and Mexico City become frosty.
If the United States takes steps now to dismantle or complicate the relationship, not only will our economy (USA) and the jobs that depend on trade with Mexico suffer concretely, but we will also show our closest trade and investment partners that the United States is no longer a reliable long-term partner. This is already causing them to seek diversity in trade and investment relations, namely by building further linkages with Beijing. As well, we need to remember that Mexico has its own politics; with the next presidential elections scheduled for 2018, perceptions that the United States is no longer a willing partner will surely amplify the political attractiveness of populist, nationalist candidates who have little interest in building relations with the United States. This would be a setback of historic proportions."
The wars that the American gov has been making for decades are approved by congress and/or the President of your country. Those wars have killed millions of innocent victims.
Drug dealers being Mexican, Colombian or American are individuals whom proceed according to their personal benefits.
Can you see the difference?
Also for you to know: We the112+ million Mexicans living in Mexico, we have to endure the crime related to the illegal trading of drugs because we are neighbours of the biggest drug market, your country.
Germany has a very strong economy and Angela knew very well what she was doing: cherry picking immigrants for cheap labor and the "rest of Europe" deal with the "rest of migrants".
Still, he will pay for allowing Trump to come to Mexico when the majority of Mexicans (living in Mexico) did reject Trump and some state houses did labelTrump as a "non grata persona"
"Didn’t Congress refuse to make undocumented presence a federal crime?"
Yes. One of the most controversial provisions of H.R. 4437, the “Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005,” or “Sensenbrenner bill,” would have made simply being undocumented in the United States a felony. Although passed by the House of Representatives, the bill was rejected by the Senate after massive street demonstrations around the nation and sharp criticism of the provision criminalizing undocumented presence. Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) attacked the bill as “mak criminals out of and demoniz a lot of hard-working people who are just trying to provide for their families.”
Still, if you do choose to categorize undocumented immigrants in USA as criminals, would those who hire them be criminals as well.
I could go on and on so could you, so let us settle this. I am liberal although I have never voted for a left candidate (yet). I am pro-migrant and that includes all people.
Some people choose to blame Mexicans for the bad economy of USA, send them back we do need them here because we do have a shortage of labor.
For you to know:
Undocumented immigrants in USA
52% Mexicans 48 % Other nationalities ( El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Philippines, India, Korea, China, Ecuador, Vietnam, etc..)
Nevertheless, do people choose to blame Mexicans (including the 112+ millions we are in Mexico) for the USA bad economy?
Be my guest.
A rethorical question: Had the astronauts a legal "intergalactic" permit to step on the moon?
Had you done some traveling you would not have to be asking that.
I could have asked "you" why Filipinos go to USA as well
There are laws Krema and rejecting people "just because" or just labeling undocumented migrants as "criminal" cuts for uninformed/uneducated people, there are also international protocols for migrants.
Anyone with two connected and working neurons would know that undocumented immigrants in USA are not Mexican them all
Mexicans made up 52% of all unauthorized immigrants in 2014, though their numbers had been declining in recent years.
There were 5.8 million Mexican unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. that year, down from 6.4 million in 2009
Meanwhile, the number of unauthorized immigrants from nations other than Mexico grew by 325,000 since 2009, to an estimated 5.3 million in 2014.
Populations went up most for unauthorized immigrants from Asia and Central America, but the number also ticked up for those from sub-Saharan Africa.
Undocumented immigrants in USA2012 Country Population 1. Mexico 6,720,000 2. El Salvador 690,000 3. Guatemala 560,000 4. Honduras 360,000 5. Philippines 310,000 6. India 260,000 7. Korea 230,000 8. China 210,000 9. Ecuador 170,000 10. Vietnam 160,000 All Countries 11,430,000
Now, the president of this land has issued a press bulletin stating that the extension of the already existing wall between Usa and México helps not to a good relationship, still he is going to meet Trump next week
There is a social movement rejecting what the president is doing and that will have a political cost next year, you bet. And no, I am not paying for any wall.
Comparing? I made a question and you fail to answer it.
"breaching the sovereignty of the country is a crime" The act of being in the USA undocumented is not a crime, according to the Federal Immigration Law of the USA, therefore undocumented immigrants are not criminals per se.
The war has started -trading- some Mexican potato growers got an legal document to stop potato imports from USA and coincidentally there was a paper work problem for letting 120 ton of avocados into USA.
Mexican Governors and top federal people are making clear their position against Trump's decision of extending the wall and planning to group against it and there has been a press bulletin that all Mexican embassies in USA are to help Mexicans with any problem should they encounter.
Perhaps, the time has come for Mexico to take its people home, diversify its trading and stop kissing assessss.
lifeisadream Forum Posts (16,713)
RE: Should I prove all the critics wrong .?
Sure, why not!