I looked at your profile in the very early stages of this thread. It can't have been up more than a few minutes at the time. At that stage of the proceedings it read "Not Single - Not Looking". I just passed it off as something lost in translation at the time, but now you're trying to tell the rest of the folks here that you've just changed it?
You're not going to know if she's your 'soulmate' unless you spend a lot of time with her first. That means speaking with her, being seen with her, going out in public with her, spending private time (one-on-one) and sharing experiences with her. That's not something you can do through the medium of the Internet.
"It has served us well, this myth of Christ" ~ Pope Leo X (16th Century)
No, I don't believe. And, I didn't need that little ditty to decide either. "Christ", "God" etc. are merely characters in a story book. One little fib that got way out of hand.
My guess is that the age and experience of the reader would dictate how it is received. Readers without the benefit of age or experience may have found it raunchy or an education, while those of us who have been around a bit longer might find it more of a memory jogging exercise. Cereal boxes have more enlightened reading.
I read book one while on hols and found it repetitive, and content wise it didn't impress. I'd seen status updates on FB claiming it to be the most 'un-put-downable' book ever. I'd be in no rush to read the second.
I have mine limited to a range of about 10 yrs (+/- 10yrs), that's my personal choice, and what I find attractive too.
I don't want someone too young, they haven't lived the experiences and we'd have very little, if nothing, in common. Also I have two sons, I don't need a third.
70Libra Forum Posts (6,782)
RE: dating
It's more of a social networking site than anything else. The site name is a bit of a misnomer.